Theorem grlimprop 49175

Description: Properties of a local isomorphism of graphs. (Contributed by AV, 21-May-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
grlimprop.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
grlimprop.w	⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐻)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
grlimprop	⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) → (𝐹:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝐺 ISubGr (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑣)) ≃𝑔𝑟 (𝐻 ISubGr (𝐻 ClNeighbVtx (𝐹‘𝑣)))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑣,𝐹   𝑣,𝐺   𝑣,𝐻   𝑣,𝑉

Allowed substitution hint:   𝑊(𝑣)

Proof of Theorem grlimprop

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		grlimdmrel 49171	. . . . 5 ⊢ Rel dom GraphLocIso
2	1	ovrcl 7461	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐻 ∈ V))
3	2	simpld 500	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) → 𝐺 ∈ V)
4	2	simprd 501	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) → 𝐻 ∈ V)
5		id 23	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻))
6	3, 4, 5	3jca 1146	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐻 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻)))
7		grlimprop.v	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
8		grlimprop.w	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐻)
9	7, 8	isgrlim 49173	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐻 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) ↔ (𝐹:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝐺 ISubGr (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑣)) ≃𝑔𝑟 (𝐻 ISubGr (𝐻 ClNeighbVtx (𝐹‘𝑣))))))
10	9	biimpd 232	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐻 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) → (𝐹:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝐺 ISubGr (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑣)) ≃𝑔𝑟 (𝐻 ISubGr (𝐻 ClNeighbVtx (𝐹‘𝑣))))))
11	6, 10	mpcom 39	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 GraphLocIso 𝐻) → (𝐹:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝐺 ISubGr (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑣)) ≃𝑔𝑟 (𝐻 ISubGr (𝐻 ClNeighbVtx (𝐹‘𝑣)))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  ∀wral 3076  Vcvv 3450   class class class wbr 5102  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6537  ‘cfv 6538  (class class class)co 7420  Vtxcvtx 29579   ClNeighbVtx cclnbgr 49009   ISubGr cisubgr 49051   ≃_𝑔𝑟 cgric 49067   GraphLocIso cgrlim 49167

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pow 5326  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7751

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-id 5545  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-rn 5661  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fn 6541  df-f 6542  df-f1 6543  df-fo 6544  df-f1o 6545  df-fv 6546  df-ov 7423  df-oprab 7424  df-mpo 7425  df-grlim 49169

This theorem is used by:  grlimf1o  49176