Theorem iseupthf1o 30188

Description: The property "⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ is an Eulerian path on the graph 𝐺". An Eulerian path is defined as bijection 𝐹 from the edges to a set 0...(𝑁 − 1) and a function 𝑃:(0...𝑁)⟶𝑉 into the vertices such that for each 0 ≤ 𝑘 < 𝑁, 𝐹(𝑘) is an edge from 𝑃(𝑘) to 𝑃(𝑘 + 1). (Since the edges are undirected and there are possibly many edges between any two given vertices, we need to list both the edges and the vertices of the path separately.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
eupths.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
iseupthf1o	⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼))

Proof of Theorem iseupthf1o

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eupths.i	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
2	1	iseupth 30187	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼))
3		istrl 29681	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹))
4	3	anbi1i 624	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼) ↔ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹) ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼))
5		anass 468	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹) ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼) ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (Fun ◡𝐹 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼)))
6		ancom 460	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Fun ◡𝐹 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹))
7	6	anbi2i 623	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (Fun ◡𝐹 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼)) ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹)))
8	4, 5, 7	3bitri 297	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼) ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹)))
9		dff1o3 6829	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼 ↔ (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹))
10	9	bicomi 224	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹) ↔ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼)
11	10	anbi2i 623	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹)) ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼))
12	2, 8, 11	3bitri 297	1 ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   class class class wbr 5124  ^◡ccnv 5658  dom cdm 5659  Fun wfun 6530  –onto→wfo 6534  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6535  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7410  0cc0 11134  ..^cfzo 13676  ♯chash 14353  iEdgciedg 28981  Walkscwlks 29581  Trailsctrls 29675  EulerPathsceupth 30183

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5271  ax-nul 5281  ax-pr 5407

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3062  df-rab 3421  df-v 3466  df-sbc 3771  df-csb 3880  df-dif 3934  df-un 3936  df-in 3938  df-ss 3948  df-nul 4314  df-if 4506  df-sn 4607  df-pr 4609  df-op 4613  df-uni 4889  df-br 5125  df-opab 5187  df-mpt 5207  df-id 5553  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7413  df-wlks 29584  df-trls 29677  df-eupth 30184

This theorem is referenced by:  eupthi  30189  upgriseupth  30193  eupth0  30200  eupthres  30201  eupthp1  30202