Theorem iseupthf1o 30562

Description: The property "⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ is an Eulerian path on the graph 𝐺". An Eulerian path is defined as bijection 𝐹 from the edges to a set 0...(𝑁 − 1) and a function 𝑃:(0...𝑁)⟶𝑉 into the vertices such that for each 0 ≤ 𝑘 < 𝑁, 𝐹(𝑘) is an edge from 𝑃(𝑘) to 𝑃(𝑘 + 1). (Since the edges are undirected and there are possibly many edges between any two given vertices, we need to list both the edges and the vertices of the path separately.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
eupths.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
iseupthf1o	⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼))

Proof of Theorem iseupthf1o

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eupths.i	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
2	1	iseupth 30561	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼))
3		istrl 30053	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹))
4	3	anbi1i 635	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼) ↔ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹) ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼))
5		anass 473	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹) ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼) ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (Fun ◡𝐹 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼)))
6		ancom 465	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Fun ◡𝐹 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹))
7	6	anbi2i 634	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (Fun ◡𝐹 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼)) ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹)))
8	4, 5, 7	3bitri 300	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼) ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹)))
9		dff1o3 6827	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼 ↔ (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹))
10	9	bicomi 227	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹) ↔ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼)
11	10	anbi2i 634	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹)) ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼))
12	2, 8, 11	3bitri 300	1 ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570   class class class wbr 5109  ^◡ccnv 5660  dom cdm 5661  Fun wfun 6530  –onto→wfo 6534  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6535  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7410  0cc0 11104  ..^cfzo 13687  ♯chash 14371  iEdgciedg 29356  Walkscwlks 29955  Trailsctrls 30047  EulerPathsceupth 30557

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pr 5404

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3745  df-csb 3854  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7413  df-wlks 29958  df-trls 30049  df-eupth 30558

This theorem is used by:  eupthi  30563  upgriseupth  30567  eupth0  30574  eupthres  30575  eupthp1  30576