| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > iseupthf1o | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: The property "〈𝐹, 𝑃〉 is an Eulerian path on the graph 𝐺". An Eulerian path is defined as bijection 𝐹 from the edges to a set 0...(𝑁 − 1) and a function 𝑃:(0...𝑁)⟶𝑉 into the vertices such that for each 0 ≤ 𝑘 < 𝑁, 𝐹(𝑘) is an edge from 𝑃(𝑘) to 𝑃(𝑘 + 1). (Since the edges are undirected and there are possibly many edges between any two given vertices, we need to list both the edges and the vertices of the path separately.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| eupths.i | ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| iseupthf1o | ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))⟶1-1ontodom 𝐼)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | eupths.i | . . 3 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) | |
| 2 | 1 | iseupth 30829 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))⟶ontodom 𝐼)) |
| 3 | istrl 30306 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹)) | |
| 4 | 3 | anbi1i 636 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))⟶ontodom 𝐼) ↔ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹) ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))⟶ontodom 𝐼)) |
| 5 | anass 474 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹) ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))⟶ontodom 𝐼) ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (Fun ◡𝐹 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))⟶ontodom 𝐼))) | |
| 6 | ancom 466 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((Fun ◡𝐹 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))⟶ontodom 𝐼) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))⟶ontodom 𝐼 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹)) | |
| 7 | 6 | anbi2i 635 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (Fun ◡𝐹 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))⟶ontodom 𝐼)) ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))⟶ontodom 𝐼 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹))) |
| 8 | 4, 5, 7 | 3bitri 300 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))⟶ontodom 𝐼) ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))⟶ontodom 𝐼 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹))) |
| 9 | dff1o3 6850 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))⟶1-1ontodom 𝐼 ↔ (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))⟶ontodom 𝐼 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹)) | |
| 10 | 9 | bicomi 227 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))⟶ontodom 𝐼 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹) ↔ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))⟶1-1ontodom 𝐼) |
| 11 | 10 | anbi2i 635 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))⟶ontodom 𝐼 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹)) ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))⟶1-1ontodom 𝐼)) |
| 12 | 2, 8, 11 | 3bitri 300 | 1 ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))⟶1-1ontodom 𝐼)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 = wceq 1570 class class class wbr 5106 ◡ccnv 5654 dom cdm 5655 Fun wfun 6549 ⟶ontowfo 6553 ⟶1-1ontowf1o 6554 ‘cfv 6555 (class class class)co 7440 0cc0 11224 ..^cfzo 13812 ♯chash 14498 iEdgciedg 29602 Walkscwlks 30204 Trailsctrls 30300 EulerPathsceupth 30825 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1945 ax-6 2002 ax-7 2043 ax-8 2149 ax-9 2157 ax-10 2180 ax-11 2197 ax-12 2216 ax-ext 2735 ax-sep 5252 ax-nul 5263 ax-pr 5395 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2102 df-mo 2567 df-eu 2597 df-clab 2742 df-cleq 2755 df-clel 2839 df-nfc 2913 df-ne 2960 df-ral 3081 df-rex 3091 df-rab 3417 df-v 3456 df-sbc 3743 df-csb 3852 df-ss 3901 df-dif 4050 df-in 4094 df-un 4154 df-nul 4282 df-if 4486 df-sn 4589 df-pr 4591 df-op 4839 df-uni 4871 df-br 5107 df-opab 5171 df-mpt 5190 df-id 5550 df-xp 5661 df-rel 5662 df-cnv 5663 df-co 5664 df-dm 5665 df-rn 5666 df-res 5667 df-ima 5668 df-iota 6509 df-fun 6557 df-fn 6558 df-f 6559 df-f1 6560 df-fo 6561 df-f1o 6562 df-fv 6563 df-ov 7443 df-wlks 30207 df-trls 30302 df-eupth 30826 |
| This theorem is used by: eupthi 30831 upgriseupth 30835 eupth0 30842 eupthres 30843 eupthp1 30844 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |