Theorem isubgredgss 48658

Description: The edges of an induced subgraph of a graph are edges of the graph. (Contributed by AV, 24-Sep-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isubgredg.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
isubgredg.e	⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)
isubgredg.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆)
isubgredg.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Edg‘𝐻)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isubgredgss	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐸)

Proof of Theorem isubgredgss

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		isubgredg.h	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆)
2	1	fveq2i 6884	. . . . 5 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐻) = (iEdg‘(𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆))
3		isubgredg.v	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
4		eqid 2763	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) = (iEdg‘𝐺)
5	3, 4	isubgriedg 48656	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → (iEdg‘(𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆)) = ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}))
6	2, 5	eqtrid 2810	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → (iEdg‘𝐻) = ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}))
7	6	rneqd 5928	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → ran (iEdg‘𝐻) = ran ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}))
8		resss 6000	. . . 4 ⊢ ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}) ⊆ (iEdg‘𝐺)
9		rnss 5929	. . . 4 ⊢ (((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}) ⊆ (iEdg‘𝐺) → ran ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}) ⊆ ran (iEdg‘𝐺))
10	8, 9	mp1i 14	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → ran ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}) ⊆ ran (iEdg‘𝐺))
11	7, 10	eqsstrd 3971	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → ran (iEdg‘𝐻) ⊆ ran (iEdg‘𝐺))
12		isubgredg.i	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Edg‘𝐻)
13		edgval 29408	. . 3 ⊢ (Edg‘𝐻) = ran (iEdg‘𝐻)
14	12, 13	eqtri 2786	. 2 ⊢ 𝐼 = ran (iEdg‘𝐻)
15		isubgredg.e	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)
16		edgval 29408	. . 3 ⊢ (Edg‘𝐺) = ran (iEdg‘𝐺)
17	15, 16	eqtri 2786	. 2 ⊢ 𝐸 = ran (iEdg‘𝐺)
18	11, 14, 17	3sstr4g 3990	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐸)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  {crab 3416   ⊆ wss 3905  dom cdm 5661  ran crn 5662   ↾ cres 5663  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7410  Vtxcvtx 29355  iEdgciedg 29356  Edgcedg 29406   ISubGr cisubgr 48653

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3745  df-csb 3854  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-pw 4564  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7413  df-oprab 7414  df-mpo 7415  df-2nd 7983  df-iedg 29358  df-edg 29407  df-isubgr 48654

This theorem is used by: (None)