Theorem isubgredgss 49166

Description: The edges of an induced subgraph of a graph are edges of the graph. (Contributed by AV, 24-Sep-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isubgredg.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
isubgredg.e	⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)
isubgredg.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆)
isubgredg.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Edg‘𝐻)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isubgredgss	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐸)

Proof of Theorem isubgredgss

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		isubgredg.h	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆)
2	1	fveq2i 6908	. . . . 5 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐻) = (iEdg‘(𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆))
3		isubgredg.v	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
4		eqid 2763	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) = (iEdg‘𝐺)
5	3, 4	isubgriedg 49164	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → (iEdg‘(𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆)) = ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}))
6	2, 5	eqtrid 2810	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → (iEdg‘𝐻) = ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}))
7	6	rneqd 5926	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → ran (iEdg‘𝐻) = ran ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}))
8		resss 6002	. . . 4 ⊢ ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}) ⊆ (iEdg‘𝐺)
9		rnss 5927	. . . 4 ⊢ (((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}) ⊆ (iEdg‘𝐺) → ran ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}) ⊆ ran (iEdg‘𝐺))
10	8, 9	mp1i 14	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → ran ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}) ⊆ ran (iEdg‘𝐺))
11	7, 10	eqsstrd 3947	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → ran (iEdg‘𝐻) ⊆ ran (iEdg‘𝐺))
12		isubgredg.i	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Edg‘𝐻)
13		edgval 29654	. . 3 ⊢ (Edg‘𝐻) = ran (iEdg‘𝐻)
14	12, 13	eqtri 2786	. 2 ⊢ 𝐼 = ran (iEdg‘𝐻)
15		isubgredg.e	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)
16		edgval 29654	. . 3 ⊢ (Edg‘𝐺) = ran (iEdg‘𝐺)
17	15, 16	eqtri 2786	. 2 ⊢ 𝐸 = ran (iEdg‘𝐺)
18	11, 14, 17	3sstr4g 3966	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐸)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  {crab 3416   ⊆ wss 3900  dom cdm 5655  ran crn 5656   ↾ cres 5657  ‘cfv 6555  (class class class)co 7440  Vtxcvtx 29601  iEdgciedg 29602  Edgcedg 29652   ISubGr cisubgr 49161

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7772

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-iota 6509  df-fun 6557  df-fv 6563  df-ov 7443  df-oprab 7444  df-mpo 7445  df-2nd 8023  df-iedg 29604  df-edg 29653  df-isubgr 49162

This theorem is used by: (None)