Theorem isubgredgss 48766

Description: The edges of an induced subgraph of a graph are edges of the graph. (Contributed by AV, 24-Sep-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isubgredg.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
isubgredg.e	⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)
isubgredg.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆)
isubgredg.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Edg‘𝐻)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isubgredgss	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐸)

Proof of Theorem isubgredgss

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		isubgredg.h	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆)
2	1	fveq2i 6885	. . . . 5 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐻) = (iEdg‘(𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆))
3		isubgredg.v	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
4		eqid 2762	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) = (iEdg‘𝐺)
5	3, 4	isubgriedg 48764	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → (iEdg‘(𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆)) = ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}))
6	2, 5	eqtrid 2809	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → (iEdg‘𝐻) = ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}))
7	6	rneqd 5926	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → ran (iEdg‘𝐻) = ran ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}))
8		resss 5998	. . . 4 ⊢ ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}) ⊆ (iEdg‘𝐺)
9		rnss 5927	. . . 4 ⊢ (((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}) ⊆ (iEdg‘𝐺) → ran ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}) ⊆ ran (iEdg‘𝐺))
10	8, 9	mp1i 14	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → ran ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}) ⊆ ran (iEdg‘𝐺))
11	7, 10	eqsstrd 3968	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → ran (iEdg‘𝐻) ⊆ ran (iEdg‘𝐺))
12		isubgredg.i	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Edg‘𝐻)
13		edgval 29490	. . 3 ⊢ (Edg‘𝐻) = ran (iEdg‘𝐻)
14	12, 13	eqtri 2785	. 2 ⊢ 𝐼 = ran (iEdg‘𝐻)
15		isubgredg.e	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)
16		edgval 29490	. . 3 ⊢ (Edg‘𝐺) = ran (iEdg‘𝐺)
17	15, 16	eqtri 2785	. 2 ⊢ 𝐸 = ran (iEdg‘𝐺)
18	11, 14, 17	3sstr4g 3987	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐸)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  {crab 3414   ⊆ wss 3902  dom cdm 5659  ran crn 5660   ↾ cres 5661  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7416  Vtxcvtx 29437  iEdgciedg 29438  Edgcedg 29488   ISubGr cisubgr 48761

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7739

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5554  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7419  df-oprab 7420  df-mpo 7421  df-2nd 7990  df-iedg 29440  df-edg 29489  df-isubgr 48762

This theorem is used by: (None)