Theorem msubffval 35721

Description: A substitution applied to an expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
msubffval.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)
msubffval.r	⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇)
msubffval.s	⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇)
msubffval.e	⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)
msubffval.o	⊢ 𝑂 = (mRSubst‘𝑇)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
msubffval	⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑆 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑pm 𝑉) ↦ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ ⟨(1st ‘𝑒), ((𝑂‘𝑓)‘(2nd ‘𝑒))⟩)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑒,𝑓,𝐸   𝑒,𝑂,𝑓   𝑅,𝑒,𝑓   𝑇,𝑒,𝑓   𝑒,𝑉,𝑓

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑆(𝑒,𝑓)   𝑊(𝑒,𝑓)

Proof of Theorem msubffval

Dummy variable 𝑡 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elex 3451	. 2 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑇 ∈ V)
2		msubffval.s	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇)
3		fveq2 6834	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mREx‘𝑡) = (mREx‘𝑇))
4		msubffval.r	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇)
5	3, 4	eqtr4di 2790	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mREx‘𝑡) = 𝑅)
6		fveq2 6834	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mVR‘𝑡) = (mVR‘𝑇))
7		msubffval.v	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)
8	6, 7	eqtr4di 2790	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mVR‘𝑡) = 𝑉)
9	5, 8	oveq12d 7378	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ((mREx‘𝑡) ↑pm (mVR‘𝑡)) = (𝑅 ↑pm 𝑉))
10		fveq2 6834	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mEx‘𝑡) = (mEx‘𝑇))
11		msubffval.e	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)
12	10, 11	eqtr4di 2790	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mEx‘𝑡) = 𝐸)
13		fveq2 6834	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mRSubst‘𝑡) = (mRSubst‘𝑇))
14		msubffval.o	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑂 = (mRSubst‘𝑇)
15	13, 14	eqtr4di 2790	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mRSubst‘𝑡) = 𝑂)
16	15	fveq1d 6836	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ((mRSubst‘𝑡)‘𝑓) = (𝑂‘𝑓))
17	16	fveq1d 6836	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (((mRSubst‘𝑡)‘𝑓)‘(2nd ‘𝑒)) = ((𝑂‘𝑓)‘(2nd ‘𝑒)))
18	17	opeq2d 4824	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ⟨(1st ‘𝑒), (((mRSubst‘𝑡)‘𝑓)‘(2nd ‘𝑒))⟩ = ⟨(1st ‘𝑒), ((𝑂‘𝑓)‘(2nd ‘𝑒))⟩)
19	12, 18	mpteq12dv 5173	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (𝑒 ∈ (mEx‘𝑡) ↦ ⟨(1st ‘𝑒), (((mRSubst‘𝑡)‘𝑓)‘(2nd ‘𝑒))⟩) = (𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ ⟨(1st ‘𝑒), ((𝑂‘𝑓)‘(2nd ‘𝑒))⟩))
20	9, 19	mpteq12dv 5173	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (𝑓 ∈ ((mREx‘𝑡) ↑pm (mVR‘𝑡)) ↦ (𝑒 ∈ (mEx‘𝑡) ↦ ⟨(1st ‘𝑒), (((mRSubst‘𝑡)‘𝑓)‘(2nd ‘𝑒))⟩)) = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑pm 𝑉) ↦ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ ⟨(1st ‘𝑒), ((𝑂‘𝑓)‘(2nd ‘𝑒))⟩)))
21		df-msub 35689	. . . 4 ⊢ mSubst = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∈ ((mREx‘𝑡) ↑pm (mVR‘𝑡)) ↦ (𝑒 ∈ (mEx‘𝑡) ↦ ⟨(1st ‘𝑒), (((mRSubst‘𝑡)‘𝑓)‘(2nd ‘𝑒))⟩)))
22		ovex 7393	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 ↑pm 𝑉) ∈ V
23	22	mptex 7171	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑pm 𝑉) ↦ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ ⟨(1st ‘𝑒), ((𝑂‘𝑓)‘(2nd ‘𝑒))⟩)) ∈ V
24	20, 21, 23	fvmpt 6941	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ V → (mSubst‘𝑇) = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑pm 𝑉) ↦ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ ⟨(1st ‘𝑒), ((𝑂‘𝑓)‘(2nd ‘𝑒))⟩)))
25	2, 24	eqtrid 2784	. 2 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ V → 𝑆 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑pm 𝑉) ↦ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ ⟨(1st ‘𝑒), ((𝑂‘𝑓)‘(2nd ‘𝑒))⟩)))
26	1, 25	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑆 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑pm 𝑉) ↦ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ ⟨(1st ‘𝑒), ((𝑂‘𝑓)‘(2nd ‘𝑒))⟩)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  Vcvv 3430  ⟨cop 4574   ↦ cmpt 5167  ‘cfv 6492  (class class class)co 7360  1^st c1st 7933  2^nd c2nd 7934   ↑_pm cpm 8767  mVRcmvar 35659  mRExcmrex 35664  mExcmex 35665  mRSubstcmrsub 35668  mSubstcmsub 35669

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5212  ax-sep 5231  ax-nul 5241  ax-pr 5370

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-reu 3344  df-rab 3391  df-v 3432  df-sbc 3730  df-csb 3839  df-dif 3893  df-un 3895  df-in 3897  df-ss 3907  df-nul 4275  df-if 4468  df-sn 4569  df-pr 4571  df-op 4575  df-uni 4852  df-iun 4936  df-br 5087  df-opab 5149  df-mpt 5168  df-id 5519  df-xp 5630  df-rel 5631  df-cnv 5632  df-co 5633  df-dm 5634  df-rn 5635  df-res 5636  df-ima 5637  df-iota 6448  df-fun 6494  df-fn 6495  df-f 6496  df-f1 6497  df-fo 6498  df-f1o 6499  df-fv 6500  df-ov 7363  df-msub 35689

This theorem is referenced by:  msubfval  35722  elmsubrn  35726  msubrn  35727  msubff  35728