Theorem onzsl 7845

Description: An ordinal number is zero, a successor ordinal, or a limit ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
onzsl	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Proof of Theorem onzsl

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elex 3483	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝐴 ∈ V)
2		eloni 6374	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → Ord 𝐴)
3		ordzsl 7844	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ Lim 𝐴))
4		3mix1 1347	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
5	4	adantl 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
6		3mix2 1348	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
7	6	adantl 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥) → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
8		3mix3 1349	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴) → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
9	5, 7, 8	3jaodan 1456	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ Lim 𝐴)) → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
10	3, 9	sylan2b 605	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Ord 𝐴) → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
11	1, 2, 10	syl2anc 595	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
12		0elon 6420	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ ∈ On
13		eleq1 2858	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ ∅ ∈ On))
14	12, 13	mpbiri 261	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → 𝐴 ∈ On)
15		onsuc 7812	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → suc 𝑥 ∈ On)
16		eleq1 2858	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ suc 𝑥 ∈ On))
17	15, 16	syl5ibrcom 250	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → 𝐴 ∈ On))
18	17	rexlimiv 3166	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → 𝐴 ∈ On)
19		limelon 6430	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ On)
20	14, 18, 19	3jaoi 1452	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ∈ On)
21	11, 20	impbii 212	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∨ w3o 1100   = wceq 1568   ∈ wcel 2150  ∃wrex 3096  Vcvv 3462  ∅c0 4294  Ord word 6363  Oncon0 6364  Lim wlim 6365  suc csuc 6366

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1823  ax-4 1837  ax-5 1938  ax-6 1995  ax-7 2036  ax-8 2152  ax-9 2160  ax-ext 2742  ax-sep 5262  ax-nul 5274  ax-pr 5408  ax-un 7736

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1102  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1571  df-fal 1581  df-ex 1808  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2749  df-cleq 2762  df-clel 2845  df-ne 2966  df-ral 3087  df-rex 3097  df-rab 3424  df-v 3464  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-pss 3933  df-nul 4295  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-tr 5224  df-eprel 5565  df-po 5573  df-so 5574  df-fr 5618  df-we 5620  df-ord 6367  df-on 6368  df-lim 6369  df-suc 6370

This theorem is referenced by:  oawordeulem  8542  r1pwss  9759  r1val1  9761  pwcfsdom  10571  winalim2  10684  rankcf  10765  dfrdg4  36401  naddwordnexlem4  44080