Theorem onzsl 7867

Description: An ordinal number is zero, a successor ordinal, or a limit ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
onzsl	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Proof of Theorem onzsl

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elex 3499	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝐴 ∈ V)
2		eloni 6396	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → Ord 𝐴)
3		ordzsl 7866	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ Lim 𝐴))
4		3mix1 1329	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
5	4	adantl 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
6		3mix2 1330	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
7	6	adantl 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥) → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
8		3mix3 1331	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴) → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
9	5, 7, 8	3jaodan 1430	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ Lim 𝐴)) → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
10	3, 9	sylan2b 594	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Ord 𝐴) → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
11	1, 2, 10	syl2anc 584	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
12		0elon 6440	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ ∈ On
13		eleq1 2827	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ ∅ ∈ On))
14	12, 13	mpbiri 258	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → 𝐴 ∈ On)
15		onsuc 7831	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → suc 𝑥 ∈ On)
16		eleq1 2827	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ suc 𝑥 ∈ On))
17	15, 16	syl5ibrcom 247	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → 𝐴 ∈ On))
18	17	rexlimiv 3146	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → 𝐴 ∈ On)
19		limelon 6450	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ On)
20	14, 18, 19	3jaoi 1427	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ∈ On)
21	11, 20	impbii 209	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∨ w3o 1085   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2106  ∃wrex 3068  Vcvv 3478  ∅c0 4339  Ord word 6385  Oncon0 6386  Lim wlim 6387  suc csuc 6388

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-6 1965  ax-7 2005  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-11 2155  ax-ext 2706  ax-sep 5302  ax-nul 5312  ax-pr 5438  ax-un 7754

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1777  df-sb 2063  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2814  df-ne 2939  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3434  df-v 3480  df-dif 3966  df-un 3968  df-in 3970  df-ss 3980  df-pss 3983  df-nul 4340  df-if 4532  df-pw 4607  df-sn 4632  df-pr 4634  df-op 4638  df-uni 4913  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-tr 5266  df-eprel 5589  df-po 5597  df-so 5598  df-fr 5641  df-we 5643  df-ord 6389  df-on 6390  df-lim 6391  df-suc 6392

This theorem is referenced by:  oawordeulem  8591  r1pwss  9822  r1val1  9824  pwcfsdom  10621  winalim2  10734  rankcf  10815  dfrdg4  35933  naddwordnexlem4  43391