Theorem onzsl 7776

Description: An ordinal number is zero, a successor ordinal, or a limit ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
onzsl	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Proof of Theorem onzsl

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elex 3457	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝐴 ∈ V)
2		eloni 6316	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → Ord 𝐴)
3		ordzsl 7775	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ Lim 𝐴))
4		3mix1 1331	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
5	4	adantl 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
6		3mix2 1332	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
7	6	adantl 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥) → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
8		3mix3 1333	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴) → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
9	5, 7, 8	3jaodan 1433	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ Lim 𝐴)) → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
10	3, 9	sylan2b 594	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Ord 𝐴) → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
11	1, 2, 10	syl2anc 584	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
12		0elon 6361	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ ∈ On
13		eleq1 2819	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ ∅ ∈ On))
14	12, 13	mpbiri 258	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → 𝐴 ∈ On)
15		onsuc 7743	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → suc 𝑥 ∈ On)
16		eleq1 2819	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ suc 𝑥 ∈ On))
17	15, 16	syl5ibrcom 247	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → 𝐴 ∈ On))
18	17	rexlimiv 3126	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 → 𝐴 ∈ On)
19		limelon 6371	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ On)
20	14, 18, 19	3jaoi 1430	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ∈ On)
21	11, 20	impbii 209	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∨ w3o 1085   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2111  ∃wrex 3056  Vcvv 3436  ∅c0 4280  Ord word 6305  Oncon0 6306  Lim wlim 6307  suc csuc 6308

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5232  ax-nul 5242  ax-pr 5368  ax-un 7668

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-ne 2929  df-ral 3048  df-rex 3057  df-rab 3396  df-v 3438  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-in 3904  df-ss 3914  df-pss 3917  df-nul 4281  df-if 4473  df-pw 4549  df-sn 4574  df-pr 4576  df-op 4580  df-uni 4857  df-br 5090  df-opab 5152  df-tr 5197  df-eprel 5514  df-po 5522  df-so 5523  df-fr 5567  df-we 5569  df-ord 6309  df-on 6310  df-lim 6311  df-suc 6312

This theorem is referenced by:  oawordeulem  8469  r1pwss  9677  r1val1  9679  pwcfsdom  10474  winalim2  10587  rankcf  10668  dfrdg4  35995  naddwordnexlem4  43493