Theorem supub 9429

Description: A supremum is an upper bound. See also supcl 9428 and suplub 9430.

This proof demonstrates how to expand an iota-based definition (df-iota 6499) using riotacl2 7396.

(Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
supmo.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)
supcl.2	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
supub	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝐶(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)

Proof of Theorem supub

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 488	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)
2	1	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
3	2	ss2rabi 4033	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦}
4		supmo.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)
5	4	supval2 9425	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))))
6		supcl.2	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
7	4, 6	supeu 9424	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
8		riotacl2 7396	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
9	7, 8	syl 18	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
10	5, 9	eqeltrd 2866	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
11	3, 10	sselid 3938	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦})
12		breq2 5118	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑤))
13	12	notbid 321	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑤))
14	13	cbvralvw 3246	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑤)
15		breq1 5117	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (𝑥𝑅𝑤 ↔ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
16	15	notbid 321	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑤 ↔ ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
17	16	ralbidv 3191	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑤 ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
18	14, 17	bitrid 286	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
19	18	elrab 3653	. . . 4 ⊢ (sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} ↔ (sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
20	19	simprbi 503	. . 3 ⊢ (sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤)
21	11, 20	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤)
22		breq2 5118	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐶 → (sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤 ↔ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))
23	22	notbid 321	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐶 → (¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤 ↔ ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))
24	23	rspccv 3581	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))
25	21, 24	syl 18	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  ∀wral 3082  ∃wrex 3092  ∃!wreu 3370  {crab 3419   class class class wbr 5114   Or wor 5573  ℩crio 7379  supcsup 9410

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rmo 3372  df-reu 3373  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-sbc 3748  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-br 5115  df-po 5574  df-so 5575  df-iota 6499  df-riota 7380  df-sup 9412

This theorem is used by:  suplub2  9431  supssd  9433  supgtoreq  9441  supiso  9446  inflb  9460  suprub  12194  suprzub  12981  supxrun  13360  supxrub  13368  dgrub  26428  ssnnssfz  33169  oddpwdc  34775  itg2addnclem  38362  supubt  38430  supinf  43050  sn-suprubd  43308  ssnn0ssfz  49169