Theorem supub 9478

Description: A supremum is an upper bound. See also supcl 9477 and suplub 9479.

This proof demonstrates how to expand an iota-based definition (df-iota 6512) using riotacl2 7416.

(Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
supmo.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)
supcl.2	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
supub	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝐶(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)

Proof of Theorem supub

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 488	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)
2	1	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
3	2	ss2rabi 4004	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦}
4		supmo.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)
5	4	supval2 9474	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))))
6		supcl.2	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
7	4, 6	supeu 9473	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
8		riotacl2 7416	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
9	7, 8	syl 18	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
10	5, 9	eqeltrd 2864	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
11	3, 10	sselid 3911	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦})
12		breq2 5110	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑤))
13	12	notbid 321	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑤))
14	13	cbvralvw 3244	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑤)
15		breq1 5109	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (𝑥𝑅𝑤 ↔ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
16	15	notbid 321	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑤 ↔ ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
17	16	ralbidv 3189	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑤 ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
18	14, 17	bitrid 286	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
19	18	elrab 3648	. . . 4 ⊢ (sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} ↔ (sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
20	19	simprbi 503	. . 3 ⊢ (sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤)
21	11, 20	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤)
22		breq2 5110	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐶 → (sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤 ↔ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))
23	22	notbid 321	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐶 → (¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤 ↔ ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))
24	23	rspccv 3577	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))
25	21, 24	syl 18	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ∀wral 3080  ∃wrex 3090  ∃!wreu 3367  {crab 3416   class class class wbr 5106   Or wor 5562  ℩crio 7399  supcsup 9459

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-po 5563  df-so 5564  df-iota 6512  df-riota 7400  df-sup 9461

This theorem is used by:  suplub2  9480  supssd  9482  supgtoreq  9490  supiso  9495  inflb  9509  suprub  12305  suprzub  13093  supxrun  13473  supxrub  13481  dgrub  26583  ssnnssfz  33449  oddpwdc  35056  itg2addnclem  38781  supubt  38865  supinf  43486  sn-suprubd  43751  ssnn0ssfz  49666