Theorem supub 9454

Description: A supremum is an upper bound. See also supcl 9453 and suplub 9455.

This proof demonstrates how to expand an iota-based definition (df-iota 6494) using riotacl2 7393.

(Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
supmo.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)
supcl.2	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
supub	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝐶(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)

Proof of Theorem supub

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 488	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)
2	1	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
3	2	ss2rabi 4001	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦}
4		supmo.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)
5	4	supval2 9450	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))))
6		supcl.2	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
7	4, 6	supeu 9449	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
8		riotacl2 7393	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
9	7, 8	syl 18	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
10	5, 9	eqeltrd 2860	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
11	3, 10	sselid 3906	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦})
12		breq2 5106	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑤))
13	12	notbid 321	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑤))
14	13	cbvralvw 3240	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑤)
15		breq1 5105	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (𝑥𝑅𝑤 ↔ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
16	15	notbid 321	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑤 ↔ ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
17	16	ralbidv 3185	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑤 ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
18	14, 17	bitrid 286	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
19	18	elrab 3644	. . . 4 ⊢ (sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} ↔ (sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
20	19	simprbi 503	. . 3 ⊢ (sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤)
21	11, 20	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤)
22		breq2 5106	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐶 → (sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤 ↔ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))
23	22	notbid 321	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐶 → (¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤 ↔ ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))
24	23	rspccv 3573	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))
25	21, 24	syl 18	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  ∀wral 3076  ∃wrex 3086  ∃!wreu 3363  {crab 3412   class class class wbr 5102   Or wor 5557  ℩crio 7376  supcsup 9435

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rmo 3365  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-po 5558  df-so 5559  df-iota 6494  df-riota 7377  df-sup 9437

This theorem is used by:  suplub2  9456  supssd  9458  supgtoreq  9466  supiso  9471  inflb  9485  suprub  12281  suprzub  13069  supxrun  13449  supxrub  13457  dgrub  26558  ssnnssfz  33425  oddpwdc  35032  itg2addnclem  38682  supubt  38766  supinf  43386  sn-suprubd  43651  ssnn0ssfz  49554