Theorem supub 9435

Description: A supremum is an upper bound. See also supcl 9434 and suplub 9436.

This proof demonstrates how to expand an iota-based definition (df-iota 6487) using riotacl2 7385.

(Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
supmo.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)
supcl.2	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
supub	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝐶(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)

Proof of Theorem supub

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 488	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)
2	1	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
3	2	ss2rabi 4024	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦}
4		supmo.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)
5	4	supval2 9431	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))))
6		supcl.2	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
7	4, 6	supeu 9430	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
8		riotacl2 7385	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
9	7, 8	syl 18	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
10	5, 9	eqeltrd 2861	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
11	3, 10	sselid 3929	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦})
12		breq2 5107	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑤))
13	12	notbid 321	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑤))
14	13	cbvralvw 3241	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑤)
15		breq1 5106	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (𝑥𝑅𝑤 ↔ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
16	15	notbid 321	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑤 ↔ ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
17	16	ralbidv 3186	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑤 ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
18	14, 17	bitrid 286	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
19	18	elrab 3645	. . . 4 ⊢ (sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} ↔ (sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
20	19	simprbi 503	. . 3 ⊢ (sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤)
21	11, 20	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤)
22		breq2 5107	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐶 → (sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤 ↔ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))
23	22	notbid 321	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐶 → (¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤 ↔ ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))
24	23	rspccv 3574	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))
25	21, 24	syl 18	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3077  ∃wrex 3087  ∃!wreu 3364  {crab 3413   class class class wbr 5103   Or wor 5558  ℩crio 7368  supcsup 9416

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rmo 3366  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-po 5559  df-so 5560  df-iota 6487  df-riota 7369  df-sup 9418

This theorem is used by:  suplub2  9437  supssd  9439  supgtoreq  9447  supiso  9452  inflb  9466  suprub  12259  suprzub  13047  supxrun  13427  supxrub  13435  dgrub  26533  ssnnssfz  33361  oddpwdc  34969  itg2addnclem  38557  supubt  38641  supinf  43261  sn-suprubd  43526  ssnn0ssfz  49405