Theorem supiso 9389

Description: Image of a supremum under an isomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
supiso.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))
supiso.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)
supisoex.3	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
supiso.4	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
supiso	⊢ (𝜑 → sup((𝐹 “ 𝐶), 𝐵, 𝑆) = (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐹,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem supiso

Dummy variables 𝑣 𝑢 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		supiso.4	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)
2		supiso.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))
3		isoso 7303	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Or 𝐵))
4	2, 3	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Or 𝐵))
5	1, 4	mpbid 232	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Or 𝐵)
6		isof1o 7278	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
7		f1of 6780	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
8	2, 6, 7	3syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
9		supisoex.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
10	1, 9	supcl 9371	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ 𝐴)
11	8, 10	ffvelcdmd 7037	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ∈ 𝐵)
12	1, 9	supub 9372	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 → ¬ sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑢))
13	12	ralrimiv 3128	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑢)
14	1, 9	suplub 9373	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑢𝑅sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑢𝑅𝑧))
15	14	expd 415	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑢𝑅sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑢𝑅𝑧)))
16	15	ralrimiv 3128	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢𝑅sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑢𝑅𝑧))
17		supiso.2	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)
18	2, 17	supisolem 9387	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ 𝐴) → ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢𝑅sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑢𝑅𝑧)) ↔ (∀𝑤 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ¬ (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))𝑆𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑤𝑆(𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣))))
19	10, 18	mpdan 688	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢𝑅sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑢𝑅𝑧)) ↔ (∀𝑤 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ¬ (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))𝑆𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑤𝑆(𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣))))
20	13, 16, 19	mpbi2and 713	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑤 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ¬ (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))𝑆𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑤𝑆(𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣)))
21	20	simpld 494	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ¬ (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))𝑆𝑤)
22	21	r19.21bi 3229	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)) → ¬ (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))𝑆𝑤)
23	20	simprd 495	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑤𝑆(𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣))
24	23	r19.21bi 3229	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑤𝑆(𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣))
25	24	impr 454	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤𝑆(𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣)
26	5, 11, 22, 25	eqsupd 9370	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup((𝐹 “ 𝐶), 𝐵, 𝑆) = (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  ∀wral 3051  ∃wrex 3061   ⊆ wss 3889   class class class wbr 5085   Or wor 5538   “ cima 5634  ⟶wf 6494  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6497  ‘cfv 6498   Isom wiso 6499  supcsup 9353

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5231  ax-nul 5241  ax-pr 5375

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3062  df-rmo 3342  df-reu 3343  df-rab 3390  df-v 3431  df-sbc 3729  df-dif 3892  df-un 3894  df-in 3896  df-ss 3906  df-nul 4274  df-if 4467  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-uni 4851  df-br 5086  df-opab 5148  df-mpt 5167  df-id 5526  df-po 5539  df-so 5540  df-xp 5637  df-rel 5638  df-cnv 5639  df-co 5640  df-dm 5641  df-rn 5642  df-res 5643  df-ima 5644  df-iota 6454  df-fun 6500  df-fn 6501  df-f 6502  df-f1 6503  df-fo 6504  df-f1o 6505  df-fv 6506  df-isom 6507  df-riota 7324  df-sup 9355

This theorem is referenced by:  infiso  9423  infrenegsup  12139