Theorem supiso 9381

Description: Image of a supremum under an isomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
supiso.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))
supiso.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)
supisoex.3	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
supiso.4	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
supiso	⊢ (𝜑 → sup((𝐹 “ 𝐶), 𝐵, 𝑆) = (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐹,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem supiso

Dummy variables 𝑣 𝑢 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		supiso.4	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)
2		supiso.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))
3		isoso 7294	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Or 𝐵))
4	2, 3	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Or 𝐵))
5	1, 4	mpbid 232	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Or 𝐵)
6		isof1o 7269	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
7		f1of 6774	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
8	2, 6, 7	3syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
9		supisoex.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
10	1, 9	supcl 9363	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ 𝐴)
11	8, 10	ffvelcdmd 7030	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ∈ 𝐵)
12	1, 9	supub 9364	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 → ¬ sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑢))
13	12	ralrimiv 3127	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑢)
14	1, 9	suplub 9365	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑢𝑅sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑢𝑅𝑧))
15	14	expd 415	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑢𝑅sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑢𝑅𝑧)))
16	15	ralrimiv 3127	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢𝑅sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑢𝑅𝑧))
17		supiso.2	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)
18	2, 17	supisolem 9379	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ 𝐴) → ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢𝑅sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑢𝑅𝑧)) ↔ (∀𝑤 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ¬ (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))𝑆𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑤𝑆(𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣))))
19	10, 18	mpdan 687	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢𝑅sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑢𝑅𝑧)) ↔ (∀𝑤 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ¬ (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))𝑆𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑤𝑆(𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣))))
20	13, 16, 19	mpbi2and 712	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑤 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ¬ (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))𝑆𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑤𝑆(𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣)))
21	20	simpld 494	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ¬ (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))𝑆𝑤)
22	21	r19.21bi 3228	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)) → ¬ (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))𝑆𝑤)
23	20	simprd 495	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑤𝑆(𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣))
24	23	r19.21bi 3228	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑤𝑆(𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣))
25	24	impr 454	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤𝑆(𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣)
26	5, 11, 22, 25	eqsupd 9362	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup((𝐹 “ 𝐶), 𝐵, 𝑆) = (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2113  ∀wral 3051  ∃wrex 3060   ⊆ wss 3901   class class class wbr 5098   Or wor 5531   “ cima 5627  ⟶wf 6488  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6491  ‘cfv 6492   Isom wiso 6493  supcsup 9345

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2146  ax-11 2162  ax-12 2184  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5241  ax-nul 5251  ax-pr 5377

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rmo 3350  df-reu 3351  df-rab 3400  df-v 3442  df-sbc 3741  df-dif 3904  df-un 3906  df-in 3908  df-ss 3918  df-nul 4286  df-if 4480  df-sn 4581  df-pr 4583  df-op 4587  df-uni 4864  df-br 5099  df-opab 5161  df-mpt 5180  df-id 5519  df-po 5532  df-so 5533  df-xp 5630  df-rel 5631  df-cnv 5632  df-co 5633  df-dm 5634  df-rn 5635  df-res 5636  df-ima 5637  df-iota 6448  df-fun 6494  df-fn 6495  df-f 6496  df-f1 6497  df-fo 6498  df-f1o 6499  df-fv 6500  df-isom 6501  df-riota 7315  df-sup 9347

This theorem is referenced by:  infiso  9415  infrenegsup  12127