Theorem oprabrexex2 6187

Description: Existence of an existentially restricted operation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
oprabrexex2.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
oprabrexex2.2	⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
oprabrexex2	⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem oprabrexex2

Dummy variable 𝑣 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-oprab 5926	. . 3 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)}
2		rexcom4 2786	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
3		rexcom4 2786	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
4		rexcom4 2786	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
5		r19.42v 2654	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
6	5	exbii 1619	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∃𝑧∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
7	4, 6	bitri 184	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
8	7	exbii 1619	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
9	3, 8	bitri 184	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
10	9	exbii 1619	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
11	2, 10	bitr2i 185	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
12	11	abbii 2312	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
13	1, 12	eqtri 2217	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
14		oprabrexex2.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
15		df-oprab 5926	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
16		oprabrexex2.2	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V
17	15, 16	eqeltrri 2270	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
18	14, 17	abrexex2 6181	. 2 ⊢ {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
19	13, 18	eqeltri 2269	1 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1364  ∃wex 1506   ∈ wcel 2167  {cab 2182  ∃wrex 2476  Vcvv 2763  ⟨cop 3625  {coprab 5923

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-13 2169  ax-14 2170  ax-ext 2178  ax-coll 4148  ax-sep 4151  ax-pow 4207  ax-pr 4242  ax-un 4468

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-eu 2048  df-mo 2049  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-ral 2480  df-rex 2481  df-reu 2482  df-rab 2484  df-v 2765  df-sbc 2990  df-csb 3085  df-un 3161  df-in 3163  df-ss 3170  df-pw 3607  df-sn 3628  df-pr 3629  df-op 3631  df-uni 3840  df-iun 3918  df-br 4034  df-opab 4095  df-mpt 4096  df-id 4328  df-xp 4669  df-rel 4670  df-cnv 4671  df-co 4672  df-dm 4673  df-rn 4674  df-res 4675  df-ima 4676  df-iota 5219  df-fun 5260  df-fn 5261  df-f 5262  df-f1 5263  df-fo 5264  df-f1o 5265  df-fv 5266  df-oprab 5926

This theorem is referenced by: (None)