Theorem oprabrexex2 6182

Description: Existence of an existentially restricted operation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
oprabrexex2.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
oprabrexex2.2	⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
oprabrexex2	⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem oprabrexex2

Dummy variable 𝑣 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-oprab 5922	. . 3 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)}
2		rexcom4 2783	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
3		rexcom4 2783	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
4		rexcom4 2783	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
5		r19.42v 2651	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
6	5	exbii 1616	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∃𝑧∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
7	4, 6	bitri 184	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
8	7	exbii 1616	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
9	3, 8	bitri 184	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
10	9	exbii 1616	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
11	2, 10	bitr2i 185	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
12	11	abbii 2309	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
13	1, 12	eqtri 2214	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
14		oprabrexex2.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
15		df-oprab 5922	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
16		oprabrexex2.2	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V
17	15, 16	eqeltrri 2267	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
18	14, 17	abrexex2 6176	. 2 ⊢ {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
19	13, 18	eqeltri 2266	1 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1364  ∃wex 1503   ∈ wcel 2164  {cab 2179  ∃wrex 2473  Vcvv 2760  ⟨cop 3621  {coprab 5919

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-13 2166  ax-14 2167  ax-ext 2175  ax-coll 4144  ax-sep 4147  ax-pow 4203  ax-pr 4238  ax-un 4464

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-eu 2045  df-mo 2046  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-ral 2477  df-rex 2478  df-reu 2479  df-rab 2481  df-v 2762  df-sbc 2986  df-csb 3081  df-un 3157  df-in 3159  df-ss 3166  df-pw 3603  df-sn 3624  df-pr 3625  df-op 3627  df-uni 3836  df-iun 3914  df-br 4030  df-opab 4091  df-mpt 4092  df-id 4324  df-xp 4665  df-rel 4666  df-cnv 4667  df-co 4668  df-dm 4669  df-rn 4670  df-res 4671  df-ima 4672  df-iota 5215  df-fun 5256  df-fn 5257  df-f 5258  df-f1 5259  df-fo 5260  df-f1o 5261  df-fv 5262  df-oprab 5922

This theorem is referenced by: (None)