Theorem oprabrexex2 6125

Description: Existence of an existentially restricted operation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
oprabrexex2.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
oprabrexex2.2	⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
oprabrexex2	⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem oprabrexex2

Dummy variable 𝑣 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-oprab 5873	. . 3 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)}
2		rexcom4 2760	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
3		rexcom4 2760	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
4		rexcom4 2760	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
5		r19.42v 2634	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
6	5	exbii 1605	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∃𝑧∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
7	4, 6	bitri 184	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
8	7	exbii 1605	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
9	3, 8	bitri 184	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
10	9	exbii 1605	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
11	2, 10	bitr2i 185	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
12	11	abbii 2293	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
13	1, 12	eqtri 2198	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
14		oprabrexex2.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
15		df-oprab 5873	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
16		oprabrexex2.2	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V
17	15, 16	eqeltrri 2251	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
18	14, 17	abrexex2 6119	. 2 ⊢ {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
19	13, 18	eqeltri 2250	1 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1353  ∃wex 1492   ∈ wcel 2148  {cab 2163  ∃wrex 2456  Vcvv 2737  ⟨cop 3594  {coprab 5870

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-13 2150  ax-14 2151  ax-ext 2159  ax-coll 4115  ax-sep 4118  ax-pow 4171  ax-pr 4206  ax-un 4430

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 980  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-eu 2029  df-mo 2030  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-ral 2460  df-rex 2461  df-reu 2462  df-rab 2464  df-v 2739  df-sbc 2963  df-csb 3058  df-un 3133  df-in 3135  df-ss 3142  df-pw 3576  df-sn 3597  df-pr 3598  df-op 3600  df-uni 3808  df-iun 3886  df-br 4001  df-opab 4062  df-mpt 4063  df-id 4290  df-xp 4629  df-rel 4630  df-cnv 4631  df-co 4632  df-dm 4633  df-rn 4634  df-res 4635  df-ima 4636  df-iota 5174  df-fun 5214  df-fn 5215  df-f 5216  df-f1 5217  df-fo 5218  df-f1o 5219  df-fv 5220  df-oprab 5873

This theorem is referenced by: (None)