Theorem oprabrexex2 6036

Description: Existence of an existentially restricted operation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
oprabrexex2.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
oprabrexex2.2	⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
oprabrexex2	⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem oprabrexex2

Dummy variable 𝑣 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-oprab 5786	. . 3 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)}
2		rexcom4 2712	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
3		rexcom4 2712	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
4		rexcom4 2712	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
5		r19.42v 2591	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
6	5	exbii 1585	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∃𝑧∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
7	4, 6	bitri 183	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
8	7	exbii 1585	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
9	3, 8	bitri 183	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
10	9	exbii 1585	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
11	2, 10	bitr2i 184	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
12	11	abbii 2256	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
13	1, 12	eqtri 2161	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
14		oprabrexex2.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
15		df-oprab 5786	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
16		oprabrexex2.2	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V
17	15, 16	eqeltrri 2214	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
18	14, 17	abrexex2 6030	. 2 ⊢ {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
19	13, 18	eqeltri 2213	1 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 103   = wceq 1332  ∃wex 1469   ∈ wcel 1481  {cab 2126  ∃wrex 2418  Vcvv 2689  ⟨cop 3535  {coprab 5783

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1424  ax-7 1425  ax-gen 1426  ax-ie1 1470  ax-ie2 1471  ax-8 1483  ax-10 1484  ax-11 1485  ax-i12 1486  ax-bndl 1487  ax-4 1488  ax-13 1492  ax-14 1493  ax-17 1507  ax-i9 1511  ax-ial 1515  ax-i5r 1516  ax-ext 2122  ax-coll 4051  ax-sep 4054  ax-pow 4106  ax-pr 4139  ax-un 4363

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 965  df-tru 1335  df-nf 1438  df-sb 1737  df-eu 2003  df-mo 2004  df-clab 2127  df-cleq 2133  df-clel 2136  df-nfc 2271  df-ral 2422  df-rex 2423  df-reu 2424  df-rab 2426  df-v 2691  df-sbc 2914  df-csb 3008  df-un 3080  df-in 3082  df-ss 3089  df-pw 3517  df-sn 3538  df-pr 3539  df-op 3541  df-uni 3745  df-iun 3823  df-br 3938  df-opab 3998  df-mpt 3999  df-id 4223  df-xp 4553  df-rel 4554  df-cnv 4555  df-co 4556  df-dm 4557  df-rn 4558  df-res 4559  df-ima 4560  df-iota 5096  df-fun 5133  df-fn 5134  df-f 5135  df-f1 5136  df-fo 5137  df-f1o 5138  df-fv 5139  df-oprab 5786

This theorem is referenced by: (None)