Theorem brwitnlem 8494

Description: Lemma for relations which assert the existence of a witness in a two-parameter set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 25-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
brwitnlem.r	⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝑂 “ (V ∖ 1o))
brwitnlem.o	⊢ 𝑂 Fn 𝑋

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brwitnlem	⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝑂𝐵) ≠ ∅)

Proof of Theorem brwitnlem

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fvex 6891	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑂‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ∈ V
2		dif1o 8487	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑂‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ∈ (V ∖ 1o) ↔ ((𝑂‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ∈ V ∧ (𝑂‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅))
3	1, 2	mpbiran 722	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑂‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ∈ (V ∖ 1o) ↔ (𝑂‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅)
4	3	anbi2i 635	. . 3 ⊢ ((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑂‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ∈ (V ∖ 1o)) ↔ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑂‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅))
5		brwitnlem.o	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑂 Fn 𝑋
6		elpreima 7050	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑂 Fn 𝑋 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (◡𝑂 “ (V ∖ 1o)) ↔ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑂‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ∈ (V ∖ 1o))))
7	5, 6	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (◡𝑂 “ (V ∖ 1o)) ↔ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑂‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ∈ (V ∖ 1o)))
8		ndmfv 6910	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom 𝑂 → (𝑂‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = ∅)
9	8	necon1ai 2982	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑂‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅ → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom 𝑂)
10	5	fndmi 6636	. . . . 5 ⊢ dom 𝑂 = 𝑋
11	9, 10	eleqtrdi 2870	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑂‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅ → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑋)
12	11	pm4.71ri 570	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑂‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅ ↔ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑂‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅))
13	4, 7, 12	3bitr4i 306	. 2 ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (◡𝑂 “ (V ∖ 1o)) ↔ (𝑂‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅)
14		brwitnlem.r	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝑂 “ (V ∖ 1o))
15	14	breqi 5109	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐴(◡𝑂 “ (V ∖ 1o))𝐵)
16		df-br 5104	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴(◡𝑂 “ (V ∖ 1o))𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (◡𝑂 “ (V ∖ 1o)))
17	15, 16	bitri 278	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (◡𝑂 “ (V ∖ 1o)))
18		df-ov 7416	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴𝑂𝐵) = (𝑂‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
19	18	neeq1i 3019	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴𝑂𝐵) ≠ ∅ ↔ (𝑂‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅)
20	13, 17, 19	3bitr4i 306	1 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝑂𝐵) ≠ ∅)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ≠ wne 2955  Vcvv 3450   ∖ cdif 3896  ∅c0 4279  ⟨cop 4590   class class class wbr 5103  ^◡ccnv 5654  dom cdm 5655   “ cima 5658   Fn wfn 6528  ‘cfv 6533  (class class class)co 7413  1_oc1o 8448

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5398

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-suc 6363  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-fv 6541  df-ov 7416  df-1o 8455

This theorem is used by:  brgic  19397  brric  20656  brlmic  21252  hmph  24002  brgric  48828  brgrlic  48920