![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > canth | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: No set 𝐴 is equinumerous to its power set (Cantor's theorem), i.e., no function can map 𝐴 onto its power set. Compare Theorem 6B(b) of [Enderton] p. 132. For the equinumerosity version, see canth2 9168. Note that 𝐴 must be a set: this theorem does not hold when 𝐴 is too large to be a set; see ncanth 7385 for a counterexample. (Use nex 1796 if you want the form ¬ ∃𝑓𝑓:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jun-2016.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
canth.1 | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
canth | ⊢ ¬ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | canth.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V | |
2 | ssrab2 4089 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ⊆ 𝐴 | |
3 | 1, 2 | elpwi2 5340 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 |
4 | forn 6823 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → ran 𝐹 = 𝒫 𝐴) | |
5 | 3, 4 | eleqtrrid 2845 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ ran 𝐹) |
6 | id 22 | . . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦) | |
7 | fveq2 6906 | . . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦)) | |
8 | 6, 7 | eleq12d 2832 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦))) |
9 | 8 | notbid 318 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦))) |
10 | 9 | elrab 3694 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦))) |
11 | 10 | baibr 536 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (¬ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)})) |
12 | nbbn 383 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}) ↔ ¬ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)})) | |
13 | 11, 12 | sylib 218 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)})) |
14 | eleq2 2827 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} → (𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)})) | |
15 | 13, 14 | nsyl 140 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}) |
16 | 15 | nrex 3071 | . . 3 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} |
17 | fofn 6822 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) | |
18 | fvelrnb 6968 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)})) | |
19 | 17, 18 | syl 17 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)})) |
20 | 16, 19 | mtbiri 327 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → ¬ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ ran 𝐹) |
21 | 5, 20 | pm2.65i 194 | 1 ⊢ ¬ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 ↔ wb 206 = wceq 1536 ∈ wcel 2105 ∃wrex 3067 {crab 3432 Vcvv 3477 𝒫 cpw 4604 ran crn 5689 Fn wfn 6557 –onto→wfo 6560 ‘cfv 6562 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1791 ax-4 1805 ax-5 1907 ax-6 1964 ax-7 2004 ax-8 2107 ax-9 2115 ax-10 2138 ax-11 2154 ax-12 2174 ax-ext 2705 ax-sep 5301 ax-nul 5311 ax-pr 5437 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1539 df-fal 1549 df-ex 1776 df-nf 1780 df-sb 2062 df-mo 2537 df-eu 2566 df-clab 2712 df-cleq 2726 df-clel 2813 df-nfc 2889 df-ne 2938 df-ral 3059 df-rex 3068 df-rab 3433 df-v 3479 df-dif 3965 df-un 3967 df-in 3969 df-ss 3979 df-nul 4339 df-if 4531 df-pw 4606 df-sn 4631 df-pr 4633 df-op 4637 df-uni 4912 df-br 5148 df-opab 5210 df-mpt 5231 df-id 5582 df-xp 5694 df-rel 5695 df-cnv 5696 df-co 5697 df-dm 5698 df-rn 5699 df-iota 6515 df-fun 6564 df-fn 6565 df-f 6566 df-fo 6568 df-fv 6570 |
This theorem is referenced by: canth2 9168 canthwdom 9616 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |