Theorem canth 7352

Description: No set 𝐴 is equinumerous to its power set (Cantor's theorem), i.e., no function can map 𝐴 onto its power set. Compare Theorem 6B(b) of [Enderton] p. 132. For the equinumerosity version, see canth2 9104. Note that 𝐴 must be a set: this theorem does not hold when 𝐴 is too large to be a set; see ncanth 7353 for a counterexample. (Use nex 1822 if you want the form ¬ ∃𝑓𝑓:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jun-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
canth.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
canth	⊢ ¬ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴

Proof of Theorem canth

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		canth.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2		ssrab2 4035	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ⊆ 𝐴
3	1, 2	elpwi2 5293	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ 𝒫 𝐴
4		forn 6783	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → ran 𝐹 = 𝒫 𝐴)
5	3, 4	eleqtrrid 2871	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ ran 𝐹)
6		id 22	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
7		fveq2 6869	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦))
8	6, 7	eleq12d 2858	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
9	8	notbid 320	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
10	9	elrab 3652	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
11	10	baibr 544	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (¬ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}))
12		nbbn 385	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}) ↔ ¬ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}))
13	11, 12	sylib 220	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}))
14		eleq2 2853	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} → (𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}))
15	13, 14	nsyl 140	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)})
16	15	nrex 3092	. . 3 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}
17		fofn 6782	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
18		fvelrnb 6929	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}))
19	17, 18	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}))
20	16, 19	mtbiri 329	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → ¬ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ ran 𝐹)
21	5, 20	pm2.65i 195	1 ⊢ ¬ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ↔ wb 208   = wceq 1562   ∈ wcel 2144  ∃wrex 3088  {crab 3416  Vcvv 3456  𝒫 cpw 4557  ran crn 5650   Fn wfn 6518  –onto→wfo 6521  ‘cfv 6523

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1817  ax-4 1831  ax-5 1932  ax-6 1989  ax-7 2030  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2214  ax-ext 2736  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5258  ax-pr 5392

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1101  df-tru 1565  df-fal 1575  df-ex 1802  df-nf 1806  df-sb 2093  df-mo 2568  df-eu 2598  df-clab 2743  df-cleq 2756  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3417  df-v 3458  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5103  df-opab 5165  df-mpt 5184  df-id 5544  df-xp 5655  df-rel 5656  df-cnv 5657  df-co 5658  df-dm 5659  df-rn 5660  df-iota 6479  df-fun 6525  df-fn 6526  df-f 6527  df-fo 6529  df-fv 6531

This theorem is referenced by:  canth2  9104  canthwdom  9529