| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > canth | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: No set 𝐴 is equinumerous to its power set (Cantor's theorem), i.e., no function can map 𝐴 onto its power set. Compare Theorem 6B(b) of [Enderton] p. 132. For the equinumerosity version, see canth2 9163. Note that 𝐴 must be a set: this theorem does not hold when 𝐴 is too large to be a set; see ncanth 7385 for a counterexample. (Use nex 1832 if you want the form ¬ ∃𝑓𝑓:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jun-2016.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| canth.1 | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| canth | ⊢ ¬ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | canth.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V | |
| 2 | ssrab2 4008 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ⊆ 𝐴 | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | elpwi2 5301 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 |
| 4 | forn 6810 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → ran 𝐹 = 𝒫 𝐴) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | eleqtrrid 2871 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ ran 𝐹) |
| 6 | id 23 | . . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦) | |
| 7 | fveq2 6896 | . . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦)) | |
| 8 | 6, 7 | eleq12d 2858 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦))) |
| 9 | 8 | notbid 321 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦))) |
| 10 | 9 | elrab 3648 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦))) |
| 11 | 10 | baibr 546 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (¬ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)})) |
| 12 | nbbn 386 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}) ↔ ¬ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)})) | |
| 13 | 11, 12 | sylib 221 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)})) |
| 14 | eleq2 2853 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} → (𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)})) | |
| 15 | 13, 14 | nsyl 141 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}) |
| 16 | 15 | nrex 3094 | . . 3 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} |
| 17 | fofn 6809 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) | |
| 18 | fvelrnb 6956 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)})) | |
| 19 | 17, 18 | syl 18 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)})) |
| 20 | 16, 19 | mtbiri 330 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → ¬ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ ran 𝐹) |
| 21 | 5, 20 | pm2.65i 196 | 1 ⊢ ¬ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: ¬ wn 3 ↔ wb 209 = wceq 1569 ∈ wcel 2146 ∃wrex 3090 {crab 3416 Vcvv 3454 𝒫 cpw 4560 ran crn 5656 Fn wfn 6542 –onto→wfo 6545 ‘cfv 6547 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1827 ax-4 1841 ax-5 1944 ax-6 2001 ax-7 2042 ax-8 2148 ax-9 2156 ax-10 2179 ax-11 2196 ax-12 2215 ax-ext 2735 ax-sep 5252 ax-nul 5263 ax-pr 5395 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1572 df-fal 1582 df-ex 1812 df-nf 1816 df-sb 2101 df-mo 2567 df-eu 2597 df-clab 2742 df-cleq 2755 df-clel 2839 df-nfc 2913 df-ne 2960 df-ral 3081 df-rex 3091 df-rab 3417 df-v 3456 df-ss 3901 df-dif 4050 df-in 4094 df-un 4154 df-nul 4282 df-if 4486 df-pw 4562 df-sn 4589 df-pr 4591 df-op 4839 df-uni 4871 df-br 5107 df-opab 5171 df-mpt 5190 df-id 5550 df-xp 5661 df-rel 5662 df-cnv 5663 df-co 5664 df-dm 5665 df-rn 5666 df-iota 6501 df-fun 6549 df-fn 6550 df-f 6551 df-fo 6553 df-fv 6555 |
| This theorem is used by: canth2 9163 canthwdom 9586 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |