| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > canthwdom | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Cantor's Theorem, stated using weak dominance (this is actually a stronger statement than canth2 9185, equivalent to canth 7403). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| canthwdom | ⊢ ¬ 𝒫 𝐴 ≼* 𝐴 |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0elpw 5322 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 | |
| 2 | ne0i 4290 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (∅ ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝒫 𝐴 ≠ ∅) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | mp1i 14 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ≼* 𝐴 → 𝒫 𝐴 ≠ ∅) |
| 4 | brwdomn0 9598 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝒫 𝐴 ≼* 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴⟶onto𝒫 𝐴)) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | syl 18 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ≼* 𝐴 → (𝒫 𝐴 ≼* 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴⟶onto𝒫 𝐴)) |
| 6 | 5 | ibi 270 | . 2 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ≼* 𝐴 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴⟶onto𝒫 𝐴) |
| 7 | relwdom 9595 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Rel ≼* | |
| 8 | 7 | brrelex2i 5713 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ≼* 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V) |
| 9 | foeq2 6821 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑓:𝑥⟶onto𝒫 𝑥 ↔ 𝑓:𝐴⟶onto𝒫 𝑥)) | |
| 10 | pweq 4574 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝒫 𝑥 = 𝒫 𝐴) | |
| 11 | foeq3 6822 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝒫 𝑥 = 𝒫 𝐴 → (𝑓:𝐴⟶onto𝒫 𝑥 ↔ 𝑓:𝐴⟶onto𝒫 𝐴)) | |
| 12 | 10, 11 | syl 18 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑓:𝐴⟶onto𝒫 𝑥 ↔ 𝑓:𝐴⟶onto𝒫 𝐴)) |
| 13 | 9, 12 | bitrd 282 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑓:𝑥⟶onto𝒫 𝑥 ↔ 𝑓:𝐴⟶onto𝒫 𝐴)) |
| 14 | 13 | notbid 321 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (¬ 𝑓:𝑥⟶onto𝒫 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑓:𝐴⟶onto𝒫 𝐴)) |
| 15 | vex 3458 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V | |
| 16 | 15 | canth 7403 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ¬ 𝑓:𝑥⟶onto𝒫 𝑥 |
| 17 | 14, 16 | vtoclg 3521 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ 𝑓:𝐴⟶onto𝒫 𝐴) |
| 18 | 8, 17 | syl 18 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ≼* 𝐴 → ¬ 𝑓:𝐴⟶onto𝒫 𝐴) |
| 19 | 18 | nexdv 1971 | . 2 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ≼* 𝐴 → ¬ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴⟶onto𝒫 𝐴) |
| 20 | 6, 19 | pm2.65i 196 | 1 ⊢ ¬ 𝒫 𝐴 ≼* 𝐴 |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: ¬ wn 3 ↔ wb 209 = wceq 1570 ∃wex 1812 ∈ wcel 2147 ≠ wne 2959 Vcvv 3454 ∅c0 4281 𝒫 cpw 4560 class class class wbr 5106 ⟶ontowfo 6562 ≼* cwdom 9593 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1945 ax-6 2002 ax-7 2043 ax-8 2149 ax-9 2157 ax-10 2180 ax-11 2197 ax-12 2216 ax-ext 2735 ax-sep 5253 ax-nul 5264 ax-pr 5396 ax-un 7781 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2102 df-mo 2567 df-eu 2597 df-clab 2742 df-cleq 2755 df-clel 2839 df-nfc 2913 df-ne 2960 df-ral 3081 df-rex 3091 df-rab 3417 df-v 3456 df-ss 3901 df-dif 4050 df-in 4094 df-un 4154 df-nul 4282 df-if 4486 df-pw 4562 df-sn 4589 df-pr 4591 df-op 4839 df-uni 4871 df-br 5107 df-opab 5172 df-mpt 5191 df-id 5551 df-xp 5662 df-rel 5663 df-cnv 5664 df-co 5665 df-dm 5666 df-rn 5667 df-iota 6518 df-fun 6566 df-fn 6567 df-f 6568 df-fo 6570 df-fv 6572 df-wdom 9594 |
| This theorem is used by: pwdjudom 10330 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |