Theorem findes 7899

Description: Finite induction with explicit substitution. The first hypothesis is the basis and the second is the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. See tfindes 7861 for the transfinite version. This is an alternative for Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 9-Jul-2003.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
findes.1	⊢ [∅ / 𝑥]𝜑
findes.2	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
findes	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem findes

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfsbcq2 3749	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = ∅ → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [∅ / 𝑥]𝜑))
2		sbequ 2120	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
3		dfsbcq2 3749	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = suc 𝑦 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
4		sbequ12r 2290	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
5		findes.1	. 2 ⊢ [∅ / 𝑥]𝜑
6		nfv 1947	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ ω
7		nfs1v 2194	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
8		nfsbc1v 3766	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
9	7, 8	nfim 1929	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
10	6, 9	nfim 1929	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 ∈ ω → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
11		eleq1w 2848	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ ω ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ω))
12		sbequ12 2289	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
13		suceq 6433	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → suc 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)
14	13	sbceq1d 3751	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
15	12, 14	imbi12d 347	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
16	11, 15	imbi12d 347	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝑥 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑)) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ω → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))))
17		findes.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑))
18	10, 16, 17	chvarfv 2279	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
19	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 18	finds 7895	1 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → 𝜑)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4  [wsb 2099   ∈ wcel 2146  [wsbc 3746  ∅c0 4286  suc csuc 6366  ωcom 7864

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7738

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-pss 3926  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-tr 5221  df-eprel 5563  df-po 5571  df-so 5572  df-fr 5616  df-we 5618  df-ord 6367  df-on 6368  df-lim 6369  df-suc 6370  df-om 7865

This theorem is used by:  rdgeqoa  38049