fparlem1 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > fparlem1		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem fparlem1 8137

Description: Lemma for fpar 8141. (Contributed by NM, 22-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
fparlem1	⊢ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) = ({𝑥} × V)

Proof of Theorem fparlem1 Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fvres 6925	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = (1^st ‘𝑦))
2	1	eqeq1d 2739	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → (((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ (1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥))
3		vex 3484	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
4	3	elsn2 4665	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ↔ (1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥)
5		fvex 6919	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V
6	5	biantru 529	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V))
7	4, 6	bitr3i 277	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V))
8	2, 7	bitrdi 287	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → (((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
9	8	pm5.32i 574	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
10		f1stres 8038	. . . 4 ⊢ (1^st ↾ (V × V)):(V × V)⟶V
11		ffn 6736	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1^st ↾ (V × V)):(V × V)⟶V → (1^st ↾ (V × V)) Fn (V × V))
12		fniniseg 7080	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1^st ↾ (V × V)) Fn (V × V) → (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥)))
13	10, 11, 12	mp2b 10	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥))
14		elxp7 8049	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ({𝑥} × V) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
15	9, 13, 14	3bitr4i 303	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ({𝑥} × V))
16	15	eqriv 2734	1 ⊢ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) = ({𝑥} × V)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1540 ∈ wcel 2108 Vcvv 3480 {csn 4626 × cxp 5683 ^◡ccnv 5684 ↾ cres 5687 “ cima 5688 Fn wfn 6556 ⟶wf 6557 ‘cfv 6561 1^st c1st 8012 2^nd c2nd 8013

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1910 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2007 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-10 2141 ax-11 2157 ax-12 2177 ax-ext 2708 ax-sep 5296 ax-nul 5306 ax-pr 5432 ax-un 7755

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 849 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1543 df-fal 1553 df-ex 1780 df-nf 1784 df-sb 2065 df-mo 2540 df-eu 2569 df-clab 2715 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2816 df-nfc 2892 df-ne 2941 df-ral 3062 df-rex 3071 df-rab 3437 df-v 3482 df-sbc 3789 df-csb 3900 df-dif 3954 df-un 3956 df-in 3958 df-ss 3968 df-nul 4334 df-if 4526 df-sn 4627 df-pr 4629 df-op 4633 df-uni 4908 df-iun 4993 df-br 5144 df-opab 5206 df-mpt 5226 df-id 5578 df-xp 5691 df-rel 5692 df-cnv 5693 df-co 5694 df-dm 5695 df-rn 5696 df-res 5697 df-ima 5698 df-iota 6514 df-fun 6563 df-fn 6564 df-f 6565 df-fv 6569 df-1st 8014 df-2nd 8015

This theorem is referenced by: fparlem3 8139

W3C validator