fparlem1 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > fparlem1		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem fparlem1 8085

Description: Lemma for fpar 8089. (Contributed by NM, 22-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
fparlem1	⊢ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) = ({𝑥} × V)

Proof of Theorem fparlem1 Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fvres 6881	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = (1^st ‘𝑦))
2	1	eqeq1d 2763	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → (((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ (1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥))
3		vex 3457	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
4	3	elsn2 4621	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ↔ (1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥)
5		fvex 6875	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V
6	5	biantru 537	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V))
7	4, 6	bitr3i 279	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V))
8	2, 7	bitrdi 289	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → (((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
9	8	pm5.32i 582	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
10		f1stres 7989	. . . 4 ⊢ (1^st ↾ (V × V)):(V × V)⟶V
11		ffn 6686	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1^st ↾ (V × V)):(V × V)⟶V → (1^st ↾ (V × V)) Fn (V × V))
12		fniniseg 7036	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1^st ↾ (V × V)) Fn (V × V) → (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥)))
13	10, 11, 12	mp2b 10	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥))
14		elxp7 8000	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ({𝑥} × V) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
15	9, 13, 14	3bitr4i 305	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ({𝑥} × V))
16	15	eqriv 2758	1 ⊢ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) = ({𝑥} × V)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ↔ wb 208 ∧ wa 399 = wceq 1559 ∈ wcel 2141 Vcvv 3453 {csn 4579 × cxp 5641 ^◡ccnv 5642 ↾ cres 5645 “ cima 5646 Fn wfn 6511 ⟶wf 6512 ‘cfv 6516 1^st c1st 7963 2^nd c2nd 7964

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1814 ax-4 1828 ax-5 1929 ax-6 1986 ax-7 2027 ax-8 2143 ax-9 2151 ax-10 2174 ax-11 2190 ax-12 2211 ax-ext 2733 ax-sep 5243 ax-nul 5253 ax-pr 5387 ax-un 7713

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 400 df-or 859 df-3an 1099 df-tru 1562 df-fal 1572 df-ex 1799 df-nf 1803 df-sb 2090 df-mo 2565 df-eu 2595 df-clab 2740 df-cleq 2753 df-clel 2836 df-nfc 2910 df-ne 2957 df-ral 3076 df-rex 3086 df-rab 3414 df-v 3455 df-sbc 3743 df-csb 3851 df-dif 3905 df-un 3907 df-in 3909 df-ss 3919 df-nul 4284 df-if 4478 df-sn 4580 df-pr 4582 df-op 4586 df-uni 4863 df-iun 4948 df-br 5098 df-opab 5160 df-mpt 5179 df-id 5538 df-xp 5649 df-rel 5650 df-cnv 5651 df-co 5652 df-dm 5653 df-rn 5654 df-res 5655 df-ima 5656 df-iota 6472 df-fun 6518 df-fn 6519 df-f 6520 df-fv 6524 df-1st 7965 df-2nd 7966

This theorem is referenced by: fparlem3 8087

W3C validator