fparlem1 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > fparlem1		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem fparlem1 8153

Description: Lemma for fpar 8157. (Contributed by NM, 22-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
fparlem1	⊢ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) = ({𝑥} × V)

Proof of Theorem fparlem1 Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fvres 6939	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = (1^st ‘𝑦))
2	1	eqeq1d 2742	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → (((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ (1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥))
3		vex 3492	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
4	3	elsn2 4687	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ↔ (1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥)
5		fvex 6933	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V
6	5	biantru 529	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V))
7	4, 6	bitr3i 277	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V))
8	2, 7	bitrdi 287	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → (((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
9	8	pm5.32i 574	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
10		f1stres 8054	. . . 4 ⊢ (1^st ↾ (V × V)):(V × V)⟶V
11		ffn 6747	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1^st ↾ (V × V)):(V × V)⟶V → (1^st ↾ (V × V)) Fn (V × V))
12		fniniseg 7093	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1^st ↾ (V × V)) Fn (V × V) → (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥)))
13	10, 11, 12	mp2b 10	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥))
14		elxp7 8065	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ({𝑥} × V) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
15	9, 13, 14	3bitr4i 303	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ({𝑥} × V))
16	15	eqriv 2737	1 ⊢ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) = ({𝑥} × V)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1537 ∈ wcel 2108 Vcvv 3488 {csn 4648 × cxp 5698 ^◡ccnv 5699 ↾ cres 5702 “ cima 5703 Fn wfn 6568 ⟶wf 6569 ‘cfv 6573 1^st c1st 8028 2^nd c2nd 8029

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1793 ax-4 1807 ax-5 1909 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2007 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-10 2141 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2178 ax-ext 2711 ax-sep 5317 ax-nul 5324 ax-pr 5447 ax-un 7770

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 847 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1540 df-fal 1550 df-ex 1778 df-nf 1782 df-sb 2065 df-mo 2543 df-eu 2572 df-clab 2718 df-cleq 2732 df-clel 2819 df-nfc 2895 df-ne 2947 df-ral 3068 df-rex 3077 df-rab 3444 df-v 3490 df-sbc 3805 df-csb 3922 df-dif 3979 df-un 3981 df-in 3983 df-ss 3993 df-nul 4353 df-if 4549 df-sn 4649 df-pr 4651 df-op 4655 df-uni 4932 df-iun 5017 df-br 5167 df-opab 5229 df-mpt 5250 df-id 5593 df-xp 5706 df-rel 5707 df-cnv 5708 df-co 5709 df-dm 5710 df-rn 5711 df-res 5712 df-ima 5713 df-iota 6525 df-fun 6575 df-fn 6576 df-f 6577 df-fv 6581 df-1st 8030 df-2nd 8031

This theorem is referenced by: fparlem3 8155

W3C validator