fparlem1 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > fparlem1		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem fparlem1 8123

Description: Lemma for fpar 8127. (Contributed by NM, 22-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
fparlem1	⊢ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) = ({𝑥} × V)

Proof of Theorem fparlem1 Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fvres 6921	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = (1^st ‘𝑦))
2	1	eqeq1d 2730	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → (((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ (1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥))
3		vex 3477	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
4	3	elsn2 4672	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ↔ (1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥)
5		fvex 6915	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V
6	5	biantru 528	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V))
7	4, 6	bitr3i 276	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V))
8	2, 7	bitrdi 286	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → (((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
9	8	pm5.32i 573	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
10		f1stres 8023	. . . 4 ⊢ (1^st ↾ (V × V)):(V × V)⟶V
11		ffn 6727	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1^st ↾ (V × V)):(V × V)⟶V → (1^st ↾ (V × V)) Fn (V × V))
12		fniniseg 7074	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1^st ↾ (V × V)) Fn (V × V) → (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥)))
13	10, 11, 12	mp2b 10	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥))
14		elxp7 8034	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ({𝑥} × V) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
15	9, 13, 14	3bitr4i 302	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ({𝑥} × V))
16	15	eqriv 2725	1 ⊢ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) = ({𝑥} × V)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 394 = wceq 1533 ∈ wcel 2098 Vcvv 3473 {csn 4632 × cxp 5680 ^◡ccnv 5681 ↾ cres 5684 “ cima 5685 Fn wfn 6548 ⟶wf 6549 ‘cfv 6553 1^st c1st 7997 2^nd c2nd 7998

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1789 ax-4 1803 ax-5 1905 ax-6 1963 ax-7 2003 ax-8 2100 ax-9 2108 ax-10 2129 ax-11 2146 ax-12 2166 ax-ext 2699 ax-sep 5303 ax-nul 5310 ax-pr 5433 ax-un 7746

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 395 df-or 846 df-3an 1086 df-tru 1536 df-fal 1546 df-ex 1774 df-nf 1778 df-sb 2060 df-mo 2529 df-eu 2558 df-clab 2706 df-cleq 2720 df-clel 2806 df-nfc 2881 df-ne 2938 df-ral 3059 df-rex 3068 df-rab 3431 df-v 3475 df-sbc 3779 df-csb 3895 df-dif 3952 df-un 3954 df-in 3956 df-ss 3966 df-nul 4327 df-if 4533 df-sn 4633 df-pr 4635 df-op 4639 df-uni 4913 df-iun 5002 df-br 5153 df-opab 5215 df-mpt 5236 df-id 5580 df-xp 5688 df-rel 5689 df-cnv 5690 df-co 5691 df-dm 5692 df-rn 5693 df-res 5694 df-ima 5695 df-iota 6505 df-fun 6555 df-fn 6556 df-f 6557 df-fv 6561 df-1st 7999 df-2nd 8000

This theorem is referenced by: fparlem3 8125

W3C validator