fparlem1 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > fparlem1		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem fparlem1 8037

Description: Lemma for fpar 8041. (Contributed by NM, 22-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
fparlem1	⊢ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) = ({𝑥} × V)

Proof of Theorem fparlem1 Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fvres 6836	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = (1^st ‘𝑦))
2	1	eqeq1d 2733	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → (((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ (1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥))
3		vex 3440	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
4	3	elsn2 4613	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ↔ (1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥)
5		fvex 6830	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V
6	5	biantru 529	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V))
7	4, 6	bitr3i 277	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V))
8	2, 7	bitrdi 287	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → (((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
9	8	pm5.32i 574	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
10		f1stres 7940	. . . 4 ⊢ (1^st ↾ (V × V)):(V × V)⟶V
11		ffn 6646	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1^st ↾ (V × V)):(V × V)⟶V → (1^st ↾ (V × V)) Fn (V × V))
12		fniniseg 6988	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1^st ↾ (V × V)) Fn (V × V) → (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥)))
13	10, 11, 12	mp2b 10	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥))
14		elxp7 7951	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ({𝑥} × V) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
15	9, 13, 14	3bitr4i 303	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ({𝑥} × V))
16	15	eqriv 2728	1 ⊢ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) = ({𝑥} × V)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1541 ∈ wcel 2111 Vcvv 3436 {csn 4571 × cxp 5609 ^◡ccnv 5610 ↾ cres 5613 “ cima 5614 Fn wfn 6471 ⟶wf 6472 ‘cfv 6476 1^st c1st 7914 2^nd c2nd 7915

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1968 ax-7 2009 ax-8 2113 ax-9 2121 ax-10 2144 ax-11 2160 ax-12 2180 ax-ext 2703 ax-sep 5229 ax-nul 5239 ax-pr 5365 ax-un 7663

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1544 df-fal 1554 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-sb 2068 df-mo 2535 df-eu 2564 df-clab 2710 df-cleq 2723 df-clel 2806 df-nfc 2881 df-ne 2929 df-ral 3048 df-rex 3057 df-rab 3396 df-v 3438 df-sbc 3737 df-csb 3846 df-dif 3900 df-un 3902 df-in 3904 df-ss 3914 df-nul 4279 df-if 4471 df-sn 4572 df-pr 4574 df-op 4578 df-uni 4855 df-iun 4938 df-br 5087 df-opab 5149 df-mpt 5168 df-id 5506 df-xp 5617 df-rel 5618 df-cnv 5619 df-co 5620 df-dm 5621 df-rn 5622 df-res 5623 df-ima 5624 df-iota 6432 df-fun 6478 df-fn 6479 df-f 6480 df-fv 6484 df-1st 7916 df-2nd 7917

This theorem is referenced by: fparlem3 8039

W3C validator