fparlem1 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > fparlem1		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem fparlem1 8036

Description: Lemma for fpar 8040. (Contributed by NM, 22-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
fparlem1	⊢ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) = ({𝑥} × V)

Proof of Theorem fparlem1 Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fvres 6858	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = (1^st ‘𝑦))
2	1	eqeq1d 2739	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → (((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ (1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥))
3		vex 3447	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
4	3	elsn2 4623	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ↔ (1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥)
5		fvex 6852	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V
6	5	biantru 530	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V))
7	4, 6	bitr3i 276	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V))
8	2, 7	bitrdi 286	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → (((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
9	8	pm5.32i 575	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
10		f1stres 7937	. . . 4 ⊢ (1^st ↾ (V × V)):(V × V)⟶V
11		ffn 6665	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1^st ↾ (V × V)):(V × V)⟶V → (1^st ↾ (V × V)) Fn (V × V))
12		fniniseg 7007	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1^st ↾ (V × V)) Fn (V × V) → (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥)))
13	10, 11, 12	mp2b 10	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥))
14		elxp7 7948	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ({𝑥} × V) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
15	9, 13, 14	3bitr4i 302	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ({𝑥} × V))
16	15	eqriv 2734	1 ⊢ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) = ({𝑥} × V)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 396 = wceq 1541 ∈ wcel 2106 Vcvv 3443 {csn 4584 × cxp 5629 ^◡ccnv 5630 ↾ cres 5633 “ cima 5634 Fn wfn 6488 ⟶wf 6489 ‘cfv 6493 1^st c1st 7911 2^nd c2nd 7912

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1913 ax-6 1971 ax-7 2011 ax-8 2108 ax-9 2116 ax-10 2137 ax-11 2154 ax-12 2171 ax-ext 2708 ax-sep 5254 ax-nul 5261 ax-pr 5382 ax-un 7664

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-or 846 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1544 df-fal 1554 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2068 df-mo 2539 df-eu 2568 df-clab 2715 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2815 df-nfc 2887 df-ne 2942 df-ral 3063 df-rex 3072 df-rab 3406 df-v 3445 df-sbc 3738 df-csb 3854 df-dif 3911 df-un 3913 df-in 3915 df-ss 3925 df-nul 4281 df-if 4485 df-sn 4585 df-pr 4587 df-op 4591 df-uni 4864 df-iun 4954 df-br 5104 df-opab 5166 df-mpt 5187 df-id 5529 df-xp 5637 df-rel 5638 df-cnv 5639 df-co 5640 df-dm 5641 df-rn 5642 df-res 5643 df-ima 5644 df-iota 6445 df-fun 6495 df-fn 6496 df-f 6497 df-fv 6501 df-1st 7913 df-2nd 7914

This theorem is referenced by: fparlem3 8038

W3C validator