Theorem hpgcom 29132

Description: The half-plane relation is symmetric. Theorem 9.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
hpgid.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
hpgid.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
hpgid.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
hpgid.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
hpgid.d	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)
hpgid.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
hpgid.o	⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}
hpgcom.b	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
hpgcom.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
hpgcom	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑡,𝐴   𝑡,𝐵   𝐷,𝑎,𝑏,𝑡   𝐺,𝑎,𝑏,𝑡   𝐼,𝑎,𝑏,𝑡   𝑂,𝑎,𝑏,𝑡   𝑃,𝑎,𝑏,𝑡   𝜑,𝑡

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑎, 𝑏)   𝐴(𝑎, 𝑏)   𝐵(𝑎, 𝑏)   𝐿(𝑡, 𝑎, 𝑏)

Proof of Theorem hpgcom

Dummy variable 𝑐 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		hpgcom.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)
2		ancom 466	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐵𝑂𝑐) ↔ (𝐵𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐴𝑂𝑐))
3	2	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐵𝑂𝑐) ↔ (𝐵𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐴𝑂𝑐)))
4	3	rexbidv 3188	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐴𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐵𝑂𝑐) ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐵𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐴𝑂𝑐)))
5		hpgid.p	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
6		hpgid.i	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
7		hpgid.l	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
8		hpgid.o	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}
9		hpgid.g	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
10		hpgid.d	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)
11		hpgid.a	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
12		hpgcom.b	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
13	5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12	hpgbr 29125	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐴𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐵𝑂𝑐)))
14	5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 11	hpgbr 29125	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐵𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐴𝑂𝑐)))
15	4, 13, 14	3bitr4d 314	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵 ↔ 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐴))
16	1, 15	mpbid 235	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∃wrex 3088   ∖ cdif 3899   class class class wbr 5107  {copab 5171  ran crn 5660  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7417  Basecbs 17307  TarskiGcstrkg 28776  Itvcitv 28782  LineGclng 28783  hpGchpg 29122

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-rep 5236  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7740

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-reu 3368  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5554  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7420  df-hpg 29123

This theorem is used by:  plngcplem  29150  plngrotlem1  29152  plngmiropp  29159  nhpmirhp  29163  trgcopyeulem  29199  angmgmaddeu1  29266  tgasa1  29290  prlnghpg  29311