Theorem hpgcom 29238

Description: The half-plane relation is symmetric. Theorem 9.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
hpgid.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
hpgid.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
hpgid.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
hpgid.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
hpgid.d	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)
hpgid.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
hpgid.o	⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}
hpgcom.b	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
hpgcom.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
hpgcom	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑡,𝐴   𝑡,𝐵   𝐷,𝑎,𝑏,𝑡   𝐺,𝑎,𝑏,𝑡   𝐼,𝑎,𝑏,𝑡   𝑂,𝑎,𝑏,𝑡   𝑃,𝑎,𝑏,𝑡   𝜑,𝑡

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑎, 𝑏)   𝐴(𝑎, 𝑏)   𝐵(𝑎, 𝑏)   𝐿(𝑡, 𝑎, 𝑏)

Proof of Theorem hpgcom

Dummy variable 𝑐 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		hpgcom.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)
2		ancom 466	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐵𝑂𝑐) ↔ (𝐵𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐴𝑂𝑐))
3	2	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐵𝑂𝑐) ↔ (𝐵𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐴𝑂𝑐)))
4	3	rexbidv 3187	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐴𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐵𝑂𝑐) ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐵𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐴𝑂𝑐)))
5		hpgid.p	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
6		hpgid.i	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
7		hpgid.l	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
8		hpgid.o	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}
9		hpgid.g	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
10		hpgid.d	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)
11		hpgid.a	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
12		hpgcom.b	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
13	5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12	hpgbr 29231	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐴𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐵𝑂𝑐)))
14	5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 11	hpgbr 29231	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐵𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐴𝑂𝑐)))
15	4, 13, 14	3bitr4d 314	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵 ↔ 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐴))
16	1, 15	mpbid 235	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∃wrex 3087   ∖ cdif 3896   class class class wbr 5103  {copab 5167  ran crn 5652  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7418  Basecbs 17380  TarskiGcstrkg 28882  Itvcitv 28888  LineGclng 28889  hpGchpg 29228

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7749

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7421  df-hpg 29229

This theorem is used by:  plngcplem  29256  plngrotlem1  29258  plngmiropp  29265  nhpmirhp  29269  trgcopyeulem  29305  angmgmaddeu1  29372  tgasa1  29396  prlnghpg  29417