Theorem lfuhgr 34108

Description: A hypergraph is loop-free if and only if every edge connects at least two vertices. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 15-Oct-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lfuhgr.1	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
lfuhgr.2	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lfuhgr	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐺   𝑥,𝑉

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐼(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem lfuhgr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		edgval 28309	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Edg‘𝐺) = ran (iEdg‘𝐺)
2		lfuhgr.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
3	2	rneqi 5937	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran 𝐼 = ran (iEdg‘𝐺)
4	1, 3	eqtr4i 2764	. . . 4 ⊢ (Edg‘𝐺) = ran 𝐼
5	4	sseq1i 4011	. . 3 ⊢ ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)})
6	2	uhgrfun 28326	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → Fun 𝐼)
7		fdmrn 6750	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Fun 𝐼 ↔ 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶ran 𝐼)
8		fss 6735	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶ran 𝐼 ∧ ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}) → 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)})
9	8	ex 414	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶ran 𝐼 → (ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} → 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}))
10	7, 9	sylbi 216	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Fun 𝐼 → (ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} → 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}))
11	6, 10	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} → 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}))
12		frn 6725	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} → ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)})
13	11, 12	impbid1 224	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}))
14	5, 13	bitrid 283	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}))
15		uhgredgss 28391	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}))
16	15	difss2d 4135	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺))
17		lfuhgr.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
18	17	pweqi 4619	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝒫 𝑉 = 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺)
19	16, 18	sseqtrrdi 4034	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉)
20		ssrab 4071	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)))
21	20	baib 537	. . 3 ⊢ ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉 → ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)))
22	19, 21	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)))
23	14, 22	bitr3d 281	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2107  ∀wral 3062  {crab 3433   ⊆ wss 3949  ∅c0 4323  𝒫 cpw 4603  {csn 4629   class class class wbr 5149  dom cdm 5677  ran crn 5678  Fun wfun 6538  ⟶wf 6540  ‘cfv 6544   ≤ cle 11249  2c2 12267  ♯chash 14290  Vtxcvtx 28256  iEdgciedg 28257  Edgcedg 28307  UHGraphcuhgr 28316

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2138  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2172  ax-ext 2704  ax-sep 5300  ax-nul 5307  ax-pr 5428  ax-un 7725

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 847  df-3an 1090  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2942  df-ral 3063  df-rex 3072  df-rab 3434  df-v 3477  df-sbc 3779  df-dif 3952  df-un 3954  df-in 3956  df-ss 3966  df-nul 4324  df-if 4530  df-pw 4605  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632  df-op 4636  df-uni 4910  df-br 5150  df-opab 5212  df-mpt 5233  df-id 5575  df-xp 5683  df-rel 5684  df-cnv 5685  df-co 5686  df-dm 5687  df-rn 5688  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6546  df-fn 6547  df-f 6548  df-fv 6552  df-edg 28308  df-uhgr 28318

This theorem is referenced by:  lfuhgr2  34109