Theorem lfuhgr 29529

Description: A hypergraph is loop-free if and only if every edge connects at least two vertices. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 15-Oct-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lfuhgr.1	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
lfuhgr.2	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lfuhgr	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐺   𝑥,𝑉

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐼(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem lfuhgr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		edgval 29430	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Edg‘𝐺) = ran (iEdg‘𝐺)
2		lfuhgr.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
3	2	rneqi 5929	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran 𝐼 = ran (iEdg‘𝐺)
4	1, 3	eqtr4i 2791	. . . 4 ⊢ (Edg‘𝐺) = ran 𝐼
5	4	sseq1i 3966	. . 3 ⊢ ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)})
6	2	uhgrfun 29447	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → Fun 𝐼)
7		fdmrn 6741	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Fun 𝐼 ↔ 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶ran 𝐼)
8		fss 6726	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶ran 𝐼 ∧ ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}) → 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)})
9	8	ex 418	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶ran 𝐼 → (ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} → 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}))
10	7, 9	sylbi 220	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Fun 𝐼 → (ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} → 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}))
11	6, 10	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} → 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}))
12		frn 6717	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} → ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)})
13	11, 12	impbid1 228	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}))
14	5, 13	bitrid 286	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}))
15		uhgredgss 29512	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}))
16	15	difss2d 4093	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺))
17		lfuhgr.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
18	17	pweqi 4580	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝒫 𝑉 = 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺)
19	16, 18	sseqtrrdi 3979	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉)
20		ssrab 4026	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)))
21	20	baib 545	. . 3 ⊢ ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉 → ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)))
22	19, 21	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)))
23	14, 22	bitr3d 284	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  ∀wral 3081  {crab 3418   ⊆ wss 3906  ∅c0 4286  𝒫 cpw 4564  {csn 4591   class class class wbr 5111  dom cdm 5663  ran crn 5664  Fun wfun 6534  ⟶wf 6536  ‘cfv 6540   ≤ cle 11255  2c2 12306  ♯chash 14380  Vtxcvtx 29377  iEdgciedg 29378  Edgcedg 29428  UHGraphcuhgr 29437

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7738

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-fv 6548  df-edg 29429  df-uhgr 29439

This theorem is used by:  lfuhgr2  29530