Theorem lfuhgr 35105

Description: A hypergraph is loop-free if and only if every edge connects at least two vertices. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 15-Oct-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lfuhgr.1	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
lfuhgr.2	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lfuhgr	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐺   𝑥,𝑉

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐼(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem lfuhgr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		edgval 28976	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Edg‘𝐺) = ran (iEdg‘𝐺)
2		lfuhgr.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
3	2	rneqi 5901	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran 𝐼 = ran (iEdg‘𝐺)
4	1, 3	eqtr4i 2755	. . . 4 ⊢ (Edg‘𝐺) = ran 𝐼
5	4	sseq1i 3975	. . 3 ⊢ ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)})
6	2	uhgrfun 28993	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → Fun 𝐼)
7		fdmrn 6719	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Fun 𝐼 ↔ 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶ran 𝐼)
8		fss 6704	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶ran 𝐼 ∧ ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}) → 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)})
9	8	ex 412	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶ran 𝐼 → (ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} → 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}))
10	7, 9	sylbi 217	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Fun 𝐼 → (ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} → 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}))
11	6, 10	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} → 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}))
12		frn 6695	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} → ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)})
13	11, 12	impbid1 225	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}))
14	5, 13	bitrid 283	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}))
15		uhgredgss 29058	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}))
16	15	difss2d 4102	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺))
17		lfuhgr.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
18	17	pweqi 4579	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝒫 𝑉 = 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺)
19	16, 18	sseqtrrdi 3988	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉)
20		ssrab 4036	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)))
21	20	baib 535	. . 3 ⊢ ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉 → ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)))
22	19, 21	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)))
23	14, 22	bitr3d 281	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  ∀wral 3044  {crab 3405   ⊆ wss 3914  ∅c0 4296  𝒫 cpw 4563  {csn 4589   class class class wbr 5107  dom cdm 5638  ran crn 5639  Fun wfun 6505  ⟶wf 6507  ‘cfv 6511   ≤ cle 11209  2c2 12241  ♯chash 14295  Vtxcvtx 28923  iEdgciedg 28924  Edgcedg 28974  UHGraphcuhgr 28983

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pr 5387  ax-un 7711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-sbc 3754  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-id 5533  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-rn 5649  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fn 6514  df-f 6515  df-fv 6519  df-edg 28975  df-uhgr 28985

This theorem is referenced by:  lfuhgr2  35106