Theorem mapdfval 42652

Description: Projectivity from vector space H to dual space. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jan-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mapdval.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)
mapdval.u	⊢ 𝑈 = ((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
mapdval.s	⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑈)
mapdval.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑈)
mapdval.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LKer‘𝑈)
mapdval.o	⊢ 𝑂 = ((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
mapdval.m	⊢ 𝑀 = ((mapd‘𝐾)‘𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mapdfval	⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → 𝑀 = (𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ {𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∣ ((𝑂‘(𝑂‘(𝐿‘𝑓))) = (𝐿‘𝑓) ∧ (𝑂‘(𝐿‘𝑓)) ⊆ 𝑠)}))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑓,𝑠,𝐾   𝑓,𝐹   𝑆,𝑠   𝑓,𝑊,𝑠

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑆(𝑓)   𝑈(𝑓, 𝑠)   𝐹(𝑠)   𝐻(𝑓, 𝑠)   𝐿(𝑓, 𝑠)   𝑀(𝑓, 𝑠)   𝑂(𝑓, 𝑠)   𝑋(𝑓, 𝑠)

Proof of Theorem mapdfval

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mapdval.m	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑀 = ((mapd‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
2		mapdval.h	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)
3	2	mapdffval 42651	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑋 → (mapd‘𝐾) = (𝑤 ∈ 𝐻 ↦ (𝑠 ∈ (LSubSp‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)) ↦ {𝑓 ∈ (LFnl‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)) ∣ ((((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘(((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓))) = ((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓) ∧ (((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓)) ⊆ 𝑠)})))
4	3	fveq1d 6879	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑋 → ((mapd‘𝐾)‘𝑊) = ((𝑤 ∈ 𝐻 ↦ (𝑠 ∈ (LSubSp‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)) ↦ {𝑓 ∈ (LFnl‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)) ∣ ((((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘(((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓))) = ((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓) ∧ (((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓)) ⊆ 𝑠)}))‘𝑊))
5	1, 4	eqtrid 2808	. 2 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝑀 = ((𝑤 ∈ 𝐻 ↦ (𝑠 ∈ (LSubSp‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)) ↦ {𝑓 ∈ (LFnl‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)) ∣ ((((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘(((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓))) = ((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓) ∧ (((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓)) ⊆ 𝑠)}))‘𝑊))
6		fveq2 6877	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤) = ((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑊))
7		mapdval.u	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑈 = ((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
8	6, 7	eqtr4di 2814	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤) = 𝑈)
9	8	fveq2d 6881	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (LSubSp‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)) = (LSubSp‘𝑈))
10		mapdval.s	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑈)
11	9, 10	eqtr4di 2814	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (LSubSp‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)) = 𝑆)
12	8	fveq2d 6881	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (LFnl‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)) = (LFnl‘𝑈))
13		mapdval.f	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑈)
14	12, 13	eqtr4di 2814	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (LFnl‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)) = 𝐹)
15		fveq2 6877	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤) = ((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑊))
16		mapdval.o	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑂 = ((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
17	15, 16	eqtr4di 2814	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤) = 𝑂)
18	8	fveq2d 6881	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)) = (LKer‘𝑈))
19		mapdval.l	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LKer‘𝑈)
20	18, 19	eqtr4di 2814	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)) = 𝐿)
21	20	fveq1d 6879	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓) = (𝐿‘𝑓))
22	17, 21	fveq12d 6884	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓)) = (𝑂‘(𝐿‘𝑓)))
23	17, 22	fveq12d 6884	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘(((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓))) = (𝑂‘(𝑂‘(𝐿‘𝑓))))
24	23, 21	eqeq12d 2777	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ((((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘(((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓))) = ((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓) ↔ (𝑂‘(𝑂‘(𝐿‘𝑓))) = (𝐿‘𝑓)))
25	22	sseq1d 3962	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ((((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓)) ⊆ 𝑠 ↔ (𝑂‘(𝐿‘𝑓)) ⊆ 𝑠))
26	24, 25	anbi12d 644	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (((((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘(((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓))) = ((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓) ∧ (((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓)) ⊆ 𝑠) ↔ ((𝑂‘(𝑂‘(𝐿‘𝑓))) = (𝐿‘𝑓) ∧ (𝑂‘(𝐿‘𝑓)) ⊆ 𝑠)))
27	14, 26	rabeqbidv 3430	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → {𝑓 ∈ (LFnl‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)) ∣ ((((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘(((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓))) = ((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓) ∧ (((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓)) ⊆ 𝑠)} = {𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∣ ((𝑂‘(𝑂‘(𝐿‘𝑓))) = (𝐿‘𝑓) ∧ (𝑂‘(𝐿‘𝑓)) ⊆ 𝑠)})
28	11, 27	mpteq12dv 5192	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (𝑠 ∈ (LSubSp‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)) ↦ {𝑓 ∈ (LFnl‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)) ∣ ((((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘(((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓))) = ((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓) ∧ (((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓)) ⊆ 𝑠)}) = (𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ {𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∣ ((𝑂‘(𝑂‘(𝐿‘𝑓))) = (𝐿‘𝑓) ∧ (𝑂‘(𝐿‘𝑓)) ⊆ 𝑠)}))
29		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐻 ↦ (𝑠 ∈ (LSubSp‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)) ↦ {𝑓 ∈ (LFnl‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)) ∣ ((((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘(((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓))) = ((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓) ∧ (((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓)) ⊆ 𝑠)})) = (𝑤 ∈ 𝐻 ↦ (𝑠 ∈ (LSubSp‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)) ↦ {𝑓 ∈ (LFnl‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)) ∣ ((((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘(((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓))) = ((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓) ∧ (((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓)) ⊆ 𝑠)}))
30	28, 29, 10	mptfvmpt 7226	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 → ((𝑤 ∈ 𝐻 ↦ (𝑠 ∈ (LSubSp‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)) ↦ {𝑓 ∈ (LFnl‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)) ∣ ((((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘(((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓))) = ((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓) ∧ (((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑤)‘((LKer‘((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑤))‘𝑓)) ⊆ 𝑠)}))‘𝑊) = (𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ {𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∣ ((𝑂‘(𝑂‘(𝐿‘𝑓))) = (𝐿‘𝑓) ∧ (𝑂‘(𝐿‘𝑓)) ⊆ 𝑠)}))
31	5, 30	sylan9eq 2816	1 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → 𝑀 = (𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ {𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∣ ((𝑂‘(𝑂‘(𝐿‘𝑓))) = (𝐿‘𝑓) ∧ (𝑂‘(𝐿‘𝑓)) ⊆ 𝑠)}))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  {crab 3413   ⊆ wss 3899   ↦ cmpt 5186  ‘cfv 6531  LSubSpclss 21186  LFnlclfn 40082  LKerclk 40110  LHypclh 41009  DVecHcdvh 42103  ocHcoch 42372  mapdcmpd 42649

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pr 5391

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-iota 6487  df-fun 6533  df-fn 6534  df-f 6535  df-f1 6536  df-fo 6537  df-f1o 6538  df-fv 6539  df-mapd 42650

This theorem is used by:  mapdval  42653  mapd1o  42673