Theorem ply1frcl 22192

Description: Reverse closure for the set of univariate polynomial functions. (Contributed by AV, 9-Sep-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ply1frcl.q	⊢ 𝑄 = ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ply1frcl	⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑄 → (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑆)))

Proof of Theorem ply1frcl

Dummy variables 𝑟 𝑏 𝑠 𝑥 𝑦 𝑒 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ne0i 4329	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) → ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) ≠ ∅)
2		ply1frcl.q	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑄 = ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅)
3	1, 2	eleq2s 2845	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑄 → ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) ≠ ∅)
4		rneq 5929	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) = ∅ → ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) = ran ∅)
5		rn0 5919	. . . 4 ⊢ ran ∅ = ∅
6	4, 5	eqtrdi 2782	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) = ∅ → ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) = ∅)
7	6	necon3i 2967	. 2 ⊢ (ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) ≠ ∅ → (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) ≠ ∅)
8		n0 4341	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑒 𝑒 ∈ (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅))
9		df-evls1 22189	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ evalSub1 = (𝑠 ∈ V, 𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑠) ↦ ⦋(Base‘𝑠) / 𝑏⦌((𝑥 ∈ (𝑏 ↑m (𝑏 ↑m 1o)) ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (1o × {𝑦})))) ∘ ((1o evalSub 𝑠)‘𝑟)))
10	9	dmmpossx 8051	. . . . . 6 ⊢ dom evalSub1 ⊆ ∪ 𝑠 ∈ V ({𝑠} × 𝒫 (Base‘𝑠))
11		elfvdm 6922	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑒 ∈ ( evalSub1 ‘⟨𝑆, 𝑅⟩) → ⟨𝑆, 𝑅⟩ ∈ dom evalSub1 )
12		df-ov 7408	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) = ( evalSub1 ‘⟨𝑆, 𝑅⟩)
13	11, 12	eleq2s 2845	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑒 ∈ (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) → ⟨𝑆, 𝑅⟩ ∈ dom evalSub1 )
14	10, 13	sselid 3975	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑒 ∈ (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) → ⟨𝑆, 𝑅⟩ ∈ ∪ 𝑠 ∈ V ({𝑠} × 𝒫 (Base‘𝑠)))
15		fveq2 6885	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑆 → (Base‘𝑠) = (Base‘𝑆))
16	15	pweqd 4614	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑆 → 𝒫 (Base‘𝑠) = 𝒫 (Base‘𝑆))
17	16	opeliunxp2 5832	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑆, 𝑅⟩ ∈ ∪ 𝑠 ∈ V ({𝑠} × 𝒫 (Base‘𝑠)) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑆)))
18	14, 17	sylib 217	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑒 ∈ (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) → (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑆)))
19	18	exlimiv 1925	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑒 𝑒 ∈ (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) → (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑆)))
20	8, 19	sylbi 216	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) ≠ ∅ → (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑆)))
21	3, 7, 20	3syl 18	1 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑄 → (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑆)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1533  ∃wex 1773   ∈ wcel 2098   ≠ wne 2934  Vcvv 3468  ⦋csb 3888  ∅c0 4317  𝒫 cpw 4597  {csn 4623  ⟨cop 4629  ∪ ciun 4990   ↦ cmpt 5224   × cxp 5667  dom cdm 5669  ran crn 5670   ∘ ccom 5673  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7405  1_oc1o 8460   ↑_m cmap 8822  Basecbs 17153   evalSub ces 21975   evalSub₁ ces1 22187

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2163  ax-ext 2697  ax-sep 5292  ax-nul 5299  ax-pr 5420  ax-un 7722

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2528  df-eu 2557  df-clab 2704  df-cleq 2718  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ne 2935  df-ral 3056  df-rex 3065  df-rab 3427  df-v 3470  df-sbc 3773  df-csb 3889  df-dif 3946  df-un 3948  df-in 3950  df-ss 3960  df-nul 4318  df-if 4524  df-pw 4599  df-sn 4624  df-pr 4626  df-op 4630  df-uni 4903  df-iun 4992  df-br 5142  df-opab 5204  df-mpt 5225  df-id 5567  df-xp 5675  df-rel 5676  df-cnv 5677  df-co 5678  df-dm 5679  df-rn 5680  df-res 5681  df-ima 5682  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6539  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7408  df-oprab 7409  df-mpo 7410  df-1st 7974  df-2nd 7975  df-evls1 22189

This theorem is referenced by: (None)