Theorem ply1frcl 22205

Description: Reverse closure for the set of univariate polynomial functions. (Contributed by AV, 9-Sep-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ply1frcl.q	⊢ 𝑄 = ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ply1frcl	⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑄 → (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑆)))

Proof of Theorem ply1frcl

Dummy variables 𝑟 𝑏 𝑠 𝑥 𝑦 𝑒 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ne0i 4304	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) → ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) ≠ ∅)
2		ply1frcl.q	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑄 = ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅)
3	1, 2	eleq2s 2846	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑄 → ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) ≠ ∅)
4		rneq 5900	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) = ∅ → ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) = ran ∅)
5		rn0 5889	. . . 4 ⊢ ran ∅ = ∅
6	4, 5	eqtrdi 2780	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) = ∅ → ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) = ∅)
7	6	necon3i 2957	. 2 ⊢ (ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) ≠ ∅ → (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) ≠ ∅)
8		n0 4316	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑒 𝑒 ∈ (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅))
9		df-evls1 22202	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ evalSub1 = (𝑠 ∈ V, 𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑠) ↦ ⦋(Base‘𝑠) / 𝑏⦌((𝑥 ∈ (𝑏 ↑m (𝑏 ↑m 1o)) ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (1o × {𝑦})))) ∘ ((1o evalSub 𝑠)‘𝑟)))
10	9	dmmpossx 8045	. . . . . 6 ⊢ dom evalSub1 ⊆ ∪ 𝑠 ∈ V ({𝑠} × 𝒫 (Base‘𝑠))
11		elfvdm 6895	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑒 ∈ ( evalSub1 ‘⟨𝑆, 𝑅⟩) → ⟨𝑆, 𝑅⟩ ∈ dom evalSub1 )
12		df-ov 7390	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) = ( evalSub1 ‘⟨𝑆, 𝑅⟩)
13	11, 12	eleq2s 2846	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑒 ∈ (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) → ⟨𝑆, 𝑅⟩ ∈ dom evalSub1 )
14	10, 13	sselid 3944	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑒 ∈ (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) → ⟨𝑆, 𝑅⟩ ∈ ∪ 𝑠 ∈ V ({𝑠} × 𝒫 (Base‘𝑠)))
15		fveq2 6858	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑆 → (Base‘𝑠) = (Base‘𝑆))
16	15	pweqd 4580	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑆 → 𝒫 (Base‘𝑠) = 𝒫 (Base‘𝑆))
17	16	opeliunxp2 5802	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑆, 𝑅⟩ ∈ ∪ 𝑠 ∈ V ({𝑠} × 𝒫 (Base‘𝑠)) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑆)))
18	14, 17	sylib 218	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑒 ∈ (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) → (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑆)))
19	18	exlimiv 1930	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑒 𝑒 ∈ (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) → (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑆)))
20	8, 19	sylbi 217	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) ≠ ∅ → (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑆)))
21	3, 7, 20	3syl 18	1 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑄 → (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑆)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540  ∃wex 1779   ∈ wcel 2109   ≠ wne 2925  Vcvv 3447  ⦋csb 3862  ∅c0 4296  𝒫 cpw 4563  {csn 4589  ⟨cop 4595  ∪ ciun 4955   ↦ cmpt 5188   × cxp 5636  dom cdm 5638  ran crn 5639   ∘ ccom 5642  ‘cfv 6511  (class class class)co 7387  1_oc1o 8427   ↑_m cmap 8799  Basecbs 17179   evalSub ces 21979   evalSub₁ ces1 22200

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pr 5387  ax-un 7711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3863  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-iun 4957  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-id 5533  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-rn 5649  df-res 5650  df-ima 5651  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fv 6519  df-ov 7390  df-oprab 7391  df-mpo 7392  df-1st 7968  df-2nd 7969  df-evls1 22202

This theorem is referenced by: (None)