Theorem ply1frcl 21050

Description: Reverse closure for the set of univariate polynomial functions. (Contributed by AV, 9-Sep-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ply1frcl.q	⊢ 𝑄 = ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ply1frcl	⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑄 → (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑆)))

Proof of Theorem ply1frcl

Dummy variables 𝑟 𝑏 𝑠 𝑥 𝑦 𝑒 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ne0i 4235	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) → ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) ≠ ∅)
2		ply1frcl.q	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑄 = ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅)
3	1, 2	eleq2s 2870	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑄 → ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) ≠ ∅)
4		rneq 5782	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) = ∅ → ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) = ran ∅)
5		rn0 5772	. . . 4 ⊢ ran ∅ = ∅
6	4, 5	eqtrdi 2809	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) = ∅ → ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) = ∅)
7	6	necon3i 2983	. 2 ⊢ (ran (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) ≠ ∅ → (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) ≠ ∅)
8		n0 4247	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑒 𝑒 ∈ (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅))
9		df-evls1 21047	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ evalSub1 = (𝑠 ∈ V, 𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑠) ↦ ⦋(Base‘𝑠) / 𝑏⦌((𝑥 ∈ (𝑏 ↑m (𝑏 ↑m 1o)) ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (1o × {𝑦})))) ∘ ((1o evalSub 𝑠)‘𝑟)))
10	9	dmmpossx 7774	. . . . . 6 ⊢ dom evalSub1 ⊆ ∪ 𝑠 ∈ V ({𝑠} × 𝒫 (Base‘𝑠))
11		elfvdm 6695	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑒 ∈ ( evalSub1 ‘⟨𝑆, 𝑅⟩) → ⟨𝑆, 𝑅⟩ ∈ dom evalSub1 )
12		df-ov 7159	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) = ( evalSub1 ‘⟨𝑆, 𝑅⟩)
13	11, 12	eleq2s 2870	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑒 ∈ (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) → ⟨𝑆, 𝑅⟩ ∈ dom evalSub1 )
14	10, 13	sseldi 3892	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑒 ∈ (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) → ⟨𝑆, 𝑅⟩ ∈ ∪ 𝑠 ∈ V ({𝑠} × 𝒫 (Base‘𝑠)))
15		fveq2 6663	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑆 → (Base‘𝑠) = (Base‘𝑆))
16	15	pweqd 4516	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑆 → 𝒫 (Base‘𝑠) = 𝒫 (Base‘𝑆))
17	16	opeliunxp2 5684	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑆, 𝑅⟩ ∈ ∪ 𝑠 ∈ V ({𝑠} × 𝒫 (Base‘𝑠)) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑆)))
18	14, 17	sylib 221	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑒 ∈ (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) → (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑆)))
19	18	exlimiv 1931	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑒 𝑒 ∈ (𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) → (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑆)))
20	8, 19	sylbi 220	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑆 evalSub1 𝑅) ≠ ∅ → (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑆)))
21	3, 7, 20	3syl 18	1 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑄 → (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑆)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1538  ∃wex 1781   ∈ wcel 2111   ≠ wne 2951  Vcvv 3409  ⦋csb 3807  ∅c0 4227  𝒫 cpw 4497  {csn 4525  ⟨cop 4531  ∪ ciun 4886   ↦ cmpt 5116   × cxp 5526  dom cdm 5528  ran crn 5529   ∘ ccom 5532  ‘cfv 6340  (class class class)co 7156  1_oc1o 8111   ↑_m cmap 8422  Basecbs 16554   evalSub ces 20846   evalSub₁ ces1 21045

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2729  ax-sep 5173  ax-nul 5180  ax-pr 5302  ax-un 7465

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1541  df-fal 1551  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2557  df-eu 2588  df-clab 2736  df-cleq 2750  df-clel 2830  df-nfc 2901  df-ne 2952  df-ral 3075  df-rex 3076  df-rab 3079  df-v 3411  df-sbc 3699  df-csb 3808  df-dif 3863  df-un 3865  df-in 3867  df-ss 3877  df-nul 4228  df-if 4424  df-pw 4499  df-sn 4526  df-pr 4528  df-op 4532  df-uni 4802  df-iun 4888  df-br 5037  df-opab 5099  df-mpt 5117  df-id 5434  df-xp 5534  df-rel 5535  df-cnv 5536  df-co 5537  df-dm 5538  df-rn 5539  df-res 5540  df-ima 5541  df-iota 6299  df-fun 6342  df-fv 6348  df-ov 7159  df-oprab 7160  df-mpo 7161  df-1st 7699  df-2nd 7700  df-evls1 21047

This theorem is referenced by: (None)