Theorem sepdisj 50133

Description: Separated sets are disjoint. Note that in general separatedness also requires 𝑇 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽 and (𝑆 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇)) = ∅ as well but they are unnecessary here. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Sep-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sepdisj.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)
sepdisj.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽)
sepdisj.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ 𝑇) = ∅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sepdisj	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = ∅)

Proof of Theorem sepdisj

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sepdisj.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)
2		sepdisj.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽)
3		eqid 2760	. . . 4 ⊢ ∪ 𝐽 = ∪ 𝐽
4	3	sscls 23380	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽) → 𝑆 ⊆ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆))
5	1, 2, 4	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆))
6		sepdisj.3	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ 𝑇) = ∅)
7	5, 6	ssdisjd 50012	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = ∅)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144   ⊆ wss 3895   ∩ cin 4089  ∅c0 4278  ∪ cuni 4866  ‘cfv 6539  Topctop 23217  clsccl 23342

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5231  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pow 5326  ax-pr 5390

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-csb 3847  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-int 4907  df-iun 4952  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-mpt 5186  df-id 5545  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-rn 5661  df-res 5662  df-ima 5663  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6541  df-fn 6542  df-f 6543  df-f1 6544  df-fo 6545  df-f1o 6546  df-fv 6547  df-top 23218  df-cld 23343  df-cls 23345

This theorem is used by: (None)