Theorem sepdisj 49744

Description: Separated sets are disjoint. Note that in general separatedness also requires 𝑇 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽 and (𝑆 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇)) = ∅ as well but they are unnecessary here. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Sep-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sepdisj.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)
sepdisj.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽)
sepdisj.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ 𝑇) = ∅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sepdisj	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = ∅)

Proof of Theorem sepdisj

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sepdisj.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)
2		sepdisj.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽)
3		eqid 2766	. . . 4 ⊢ ∪ 𝐽 = ∪ 𝐽
4	3	sscls 23250	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽) → 𝑆 ⊆ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆))
5	1, 2, 4	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆))
6		sepdisj.3	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ 𝑇) = ∅)
7	5, 6	ssdisjd 49627	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = ∅)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146   ∩ cin 3907   ⊆ wss 3908  ∅c0 4289  ∪ cuni 4877  ‘cfv 6543  Topctop 23087  clsccl 23212

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-rep 5243  ax-sep 5262  ax-nul 5274  ax-pow 5341  ax-pr 5409

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-reu 3373  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-sbc 3748  df-csb 3857  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-int 4918  df-iun 4963  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-mpt 5198  df-id 5561  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-ima 5679  df-iota 6499  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-f1 6548  df-fo 6549  df-f1o 6550  df-fv 6551  df-top 23088  df-cld 23213  df-cls 23215

This theorem is used by: (None)