Theorem sepdisj 49397

Description: Separated sets are disjoint. Note that in general separatedness also requires 𝑇 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽 and (𝑆 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇)) = ∅ as well but they are unnecessary here. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Sep-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sepdisj.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)
sepdisj.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽)
sepdisj.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ 𝑇) = ∅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sepdisj	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = ∅)

Proof of Theorem sepdisj

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sepdisj.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)
2		sepdisj.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽)
3		eqid 2737	. . . 4 ⊢ ∪ 𝐽 = ∪ 𝐽
4	3	sscls 23030	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽) → 𝑆 ⊆ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆))
5	1, 2, 4	syl2anc 585	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆))
6		sepdisj.3	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ 𝑇) = ∅)
7	5, 6	ssdisjd 49280	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = ∅)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114   ∩ cin 3889   ⊆ wss 3890  ∅c0 4274  ∪ cuni 4851  ‘cfv 6490  Topctop 22867  clsccl 22992

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5212  ax-sep 5231  ax-nul 5241  ax-pow 5300  ax-pr 5368

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-reu 3344  df-rab 3391  df-v 3432  df-sbc 3730  df-csb 3839  df-dif 3893  df-un 3895  df-in 3897  df-ss 3907  df-nul 4275  df-if 4468  df-pw 4544  df-sn 4569  df-pr 4571  df-op 4575  df-uni 4852  df-int 4891  df-iun 4936  df-br 5087  df-opab 5149  df-mpt 5168  df-id 5517  df-xp 5628  df-rel 5629  df-cnv 5630  df-co 5631  df-dm 5632  df-rn 5633  df-res 5634  df-ima 5635  df-iota 6446  df-fun 6492  df-fn 6493  df-f 6494  df-f1 6495  df-fo 6496  df-f1o 6497  df-fv 6498  df-top 22868  df-cld 22993  df-cls 22995

This theorem is referenced by: (None)