Theorem sepnsepo 48963

Description: Open neighborhood and neighborhood is equivalent regarding disjointness for both sides. Namely, separatedness by open neighborhoods is equivalent to separatedness by neighborhoods. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 1-Sep-2024.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
sepnsepolem2.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sepnsepo	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐶)∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐷   𝑦,𝐽,𝑥   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦   𝑥,𝐷   𝑥,𝐽

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem sepnsepo

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sepnsepolem2.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)
2		id 22	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → 𝐽 ∈ Top)
3	2	sepnsepolem2 48962	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))
4	3	anbi2d 630	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))))
5	4	rexbidv 3156	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))))
6		ssrin 4189	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ⊆ 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) ⊆ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦))
7		sseq0 4350	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) ⊆ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
8	7	ex 412	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) ⊆ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) → ((𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
9	6, 8	syl 17	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 ⊆ 𝑥 → ((𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
10	9	adantl 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑥) → ((𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
11	10	reximdv 3147	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑥) → (∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
12		simpr 484	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝑥 = 𝑧)
13	12	ineq1d 4166	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦))
14	13	eqeq1d 2733	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → ((𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
15	14	rexbidv 3156	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
16	2, 11, 15	opnneieqv 48950	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐶)∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))
17		sepnsepolem1 48961	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))
18	17	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))))
19	5, 16, 18	3bitr4d 311	. 2 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐶)∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))
20	1, 19	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐶)∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2111  ∃wrex 3056   ∩ cin 3896   ⊆ wss 3897  ∅c0 4280  ‘cfv 6481  Topctop 22808  neicnei 23012

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2180  ax-ext 2703  ax-rep 5215  ax-sep 5232  ax-nul 5242  ax-pow 5301  ax-pr 5368

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ne 2929  df-ral 3048  df-rex 3057  df-reu 3347  df-rab 3396  df-v 3438  df-sbc 3737  df-csb 3846  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-in 3904  df-ss 3914  df-nul 4281  df-if 4473  df-pw 4549  df-sn 4574  df-pr 4576  df-op 4580  df-uni 4857  df-iun 4941  df-br 5090  df-opab 5152  df-mpt 5171  df-id 5509  df-xp 5620  df-rel 5621  df-cnv 5622  df-co 5623  df-dm 5624  df-rn 5625  df-res 5626  df-ima 5627  df-iota 6437  df-fun 6483  df-fn 6484  df-f 6485  df-f1 6486  df-fo 6487  df-f1o 6488  df-fv 6489  df-top 22809  df-nei 23013

This theorem is referenced by:  sepcsepo  48966  isnrm4  48970  iscnrm4  48993