Theorem sepnsepo 49722

Description: Open neighborhood and neighborhood is equivalent regarding disjointness for both sides. Namely, separatedness by open neighborhoods is equivalent to separatedness by neighborhoods. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 1-Sep-2024.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
sepnsepolem2.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sepnsepo	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐶)∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐷   𝑦,𝐽,𝑥   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦   𝑥,𝐷   𝑥,𝐽

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem sepnsepo

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sepnsepolem2.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)
2		id 23	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → 𝐽 ∈ Top)
3	2	sepnsepolem2 49721	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))
4	3	anbi2d 641	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))))
5	4	rexbidv 3189	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))))
6		ssrin 4194	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ⊆ 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) ⊆ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦))
7		sseq0 4361	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) ⊆ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
8	7	ex 417	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) ⊆ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) → ((𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
9	6, 8	syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 ⊆ 𝑥 → ((𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
10	9	adantl 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑥) → ((𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
11	10	reximdv 3180	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑥) → (∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
12		simpr 489	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝑥 = 𝑧)
13	12	ineq1d 4172	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦))
14	13	eqeq1d 2765	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → ((𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
15	14	rexbidv 3189	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
16	2, 11, 15	opnneieqv 49709	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐶)∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))
17		sepnsepolem1 49720	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))
18	17	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))))
19	5, 16, 18	3bitr4d 314	. 2 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐶)∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))
20	1, 19	syl 18	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐶)∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  ∃wrex 3089   ∩ cin 3904   ⊆ wss 3905  ∅c0 4286  ‘cfv 6536  Topctop 23050  neicnei 23254

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5238  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pow 5336  ax-pr 5404

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3745  df-csb 3854  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-pw 4564  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-iun 4958  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-top 23051  df-nei 23255

This theorem is referenced by:  sepcsepo  49725  isnrm4  49729  iscnrm4  49752