Theorem sepnsepo 48912

Description: Open neighborhood and neighborhood is equivalent regarding disjointness for both sides. Namely, separatedness by open neighborhoods is equivalent to separatedness by neighborhoods. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 1-Sep-2024.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
sepnsepolem2.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sepnsepo	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐶)∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐷   𝑦,𝐽,𝑥   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦   𝑥,𝐷   𝑥,𝐽

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem sepnsepo

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sepnsepolem2.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)
2		id 22	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → 𝐽 ∈ Top)
3	2	sepnsepolem2 48911	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))
4	3	anbi2d 630	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))))
5	4	rexbidv 3157	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))))
6		ssrin 4205	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ⊆ 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) ⊆ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦))
7		sseq0 4366	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) ⊆ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
8	7	ex 412	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) ⊆ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) → ((𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
9	6, 8	syl 17	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 ⊆ 𝑥 → ((𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
10	9	adantl 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑥) → ((𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
11	10	reximdv 3148	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑥) → (∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
12		simpr 484	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝑥 = 𝑧)
13	12	ineq1d 4182	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦))
14	13	eqeq1d 2731	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → ((𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
15	14	rexbidv 3157	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑧 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
16	2, 11, 15	opnneieqv 48899	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐶)∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))
17		sepnsepolem1 48910	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))
18	17	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))))
19	5, 16, 18	3bitr4d 311	. 2 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐶)∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))
20	1, 19	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐶)∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  ∃wrex 3053   ∩ cin 3913   ⊆ wss 3914  ∅c0 4296  ‘cfv 6511  Topctop 22780  neicnei 22984

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-rep 5234  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pow 5320  ax-pr 5387

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-reu 3355  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3863  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-iun 4957  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-id 5533  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-rn 5649  df-res 5650  df-ima 5651  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fn 6514  df-f 6515  df-f1 6516  df-fo 6517  df-f1o 6518  df-fv 6519  df-top 22781  df-nei 22985

This theorem is referenced by:  sepcsepo  48915  isnrm4  48919  iscnrm4  48942