Theorem subrngringnsg 20838

Description: A subring is a normal subgroup. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
subrngringnsg	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) → 𝐴 ∈ (NrmSGrp‘𝑅))

Proof of Theorem subrngringnsg

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		subrngsubg 20837	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) → 𝐴 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝑅))
2		subrngrcl 20836	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) → 𝑅 ∈ Rng)
3		rngabl 20410	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Rng → 𝑅 ∈ Abel)
4	2, 3	syl 18	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) → 𝑅 ∈ Abel)
5	4	3anim1i 1170	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑅)) → (𝑅 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑅)))
6	5	3expb 1138	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑅))) → (𝑅 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑅)))
7		eqid 2763	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Base‘𝑅) = (Base‘𝑅)
8		eqid 2763	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (+g‘𝑅) = (+g‘𝑅)
9	7, 8	ablcom 20046	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑅)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝑅)𝑦) = (𝑦(+g‘𝑅)𝑥))
10	6, 9	syl 18	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑅))) → (𝑥(+g‘𝑅)𝑦) = (𝑦(+g‘𝑅)𝑥))
11	10	eleq1d 2849	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑅))) → ((𝑥(+g‘𝑅)𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑦(+g‘𝑅)𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
12	11	biimpd 232	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑅))) → ((𝑥(+g‘𝑅)𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑦(+g‘𝑅)𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
13	12	ralrimivva 3209	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) → ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑅)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑅)((𝑥(+g‘𝑅)𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑦(+g‘𝑅)𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
14	7, 8	isnsg2 19398	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (NrmSGrp‘𝑅) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑅)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑅)((𝑥(+g‘𝑅)𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑦(+g‘𝑅)𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)))
15	1, 13, 14	sylanbrc 595	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) → 𝐴 ∈ (NrmSGrp‘𝑅))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ∀wral 3080  ‘cfv 6561  (class class class)co 7446  Basecbs 17419  +_gcplusg 17460  SubGrpcsubg 19362  NrmSGrpcnsg 19363  Abelcabl 20028  Rngcrng 20407  SubRngcsubrng 20830

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5253  ax-nul 5264  ax-pow 5332  ax-pr 5396

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5551  df-xp 5662  df-rel 5663  df-cnv 5664  df-co 5665  df-dm 5666  df-rn 5667  df-res 5668  df-ima 5669  df-iota 6515  df-fun 6563  df-fv 6569  df-ov 7449  df-subg 19365  df-nsg 19366  df-cmn 20029  df-abl 20030  df-rng 20408  df-subrng 20831

This theorem is used by:  rng2idlnsg  21593  rng2idlsubgnsg  21596