Theorem suppiniseg 33279

Description: Relation between the support (𝐹 supp 𝑍) and the initial segment (^◡𝐹 “ {𝑍}). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jun-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suppiniseg	⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (dom 𝐹 ∖ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) = (◡𝐹 “ {𝑍}))

Proof of Theorem suppiniseg

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eldif 4049	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∖ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)))
2		funfn 6570	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ 𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹)
3	2	biimpi 219	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → 𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹)
4		elsuppfng 8186	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ 𝑍)))
5	3, 4	syl3an1 1181	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ 𝑍)))
6	5	baibd 549	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ 𝑍))
7	6	notbid 321	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ ¬ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ 𝑍))
8		nne 2959	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ 𝑍 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝑍)
9	7, 8	bitrdi 290	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝑍))
10		fvex 6898	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V
11	10	elsn 4598	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ {𝑍} ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝑍)
12	9, 11	bitr4di 292	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ {𝑍}))
13	12	pm5.32da 590	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ {𝑍})))
14	1, 13	bitrid 286	. . 3 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∖ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ {𝑍})))
15	3	3ad2ant1 1151	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹)
16		elpreima 7057	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑍}) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ {𝑍})))
17	15, 16	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑍}) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ {𝑍})))
18	14, 17	bitr4d 285	. 2 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∖ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑍})))
19	18	eqrdv 2758	1 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (dom 𝐹 ∖ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) = (◡𝐹 “ {𝑍}))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144   ≠ wne 2955   ∖ cdif 4045  {csn 4583  ^◡ccnv 5649  dom cdm 5650   “ cima 5653  Fun wfun 6532   Fn wfn 6533  ‘cfv 6538  (class class class)co 7420   supp csupp 8177

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7751

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4584  df-pr 4586  df-op 4590  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-id 5545  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-rn 5661  df-res 5662  df-ima 5663  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fn 6541  df-fv 6546  df-ov 7423  df-oprab 7424  df-mpo 7425  df-supp 8178

This theorem is used by:  fressupp  33281  supppreima  33284