Theorem suppiniseg 33347

Description: Relation between the support (𝐹 supp 𝑍) and the initial segment (^◡𝐹 “ {𝑍}). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jun-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suppiniseg	⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (dom 𝐹 ∖ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) = (◡𝐹 “ {𝑍}))

Proof of Theorem suppiniseg

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eldif 4052	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∖ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)))
2		funfn 6587	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ 𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹)
3	2	biimpi 219	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → 𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹)
4		elsuppfng 8211	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ 𝑍)))
5	3, 4	syl3an1 1181	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ 𝑍)))
6	5	baibd 549	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ 𝑍))
7	6	notbid 321	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ ¬ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ 𝑍))
8		nne 2963	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ 𝑍 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝑍)
9	7, 8	bitrdi 290	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝑍))
10		fvex 6918	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V
11	10	elsn 4599	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ {𝑍} ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝑍)
12	9, 11	bitr4di 292	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ {𝑍}))
13	12	pm5.32da 590	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ {𝑍})))
14	1, 13	bitrid 286	. . 3 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∖ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ {𝑍})))
15	3	3ad2ant1 1151	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹)
16		elpreima 7077	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑍}) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ {𝑍})))
17	15, 16	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑍}) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ {𝑍})))
18	14, 17	bitr4d 285	. 2 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∖ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑍})))
19	18	eqrdv 2761	1 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (dom 𝐹 ∖ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) = (◡𝐹 “ {𝑍}))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147   ≠ wne 2959   ∖ cdif 4048  {csn 4588  ^◡ccnv 5654  dom cdm 5655   “ cima 5658  Fun wfun 6549   Fn wfn 6550  ‘cfv 6555  (class class class)co 7440   supp csupp 8201

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7772

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6509  df-fun 6557  df-fn 6558  df-fv 6563  df-ov 7443  df-oprab 7444  df-mpo 7445  df-supp 8202

This theorem is used by:  fressupp  33349  supppreima  33352