Theorem suppiniseg 33040

Description: Relation between the support (𝐹 supp 𝑍) and the initial segment (^◡𝐹 “ {𝑍}). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jun-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suppiniseg	⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (dom 𝐹 ∖ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) = (◡𝐹 “ {𝑍}))

Proof of Theorem suppiniseg

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eldif 3915	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∖ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)))
2		funfn 6566	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ 𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹)
3	2	biimpi 219	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → 𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹)
4		elsuppfng 8161	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ 𝑍)))
5	3, 4	syl3an1 1181	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ 𝑍)))
6	5	baibd 548	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ 𝑍))
7	6	notbid 321	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ ¬ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ 𝑍))
8		nne 2962	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ 𝑍 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝑍)
9	7, 8	bitrdi 290	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝑍))
10		fvex 6894	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V
11	10	elsn 4604	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ {𝑍} ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝑍)
12	9, 11	bitr4di 292	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ {𝑍}))
13	12	pm5.32da 589	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ {𝑍})))
14	1, 13	bitrid 286	. . 3 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∖ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ {𝑍})))
15	3	3ad2ant1 1151	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹)
16		elpreima 7053	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑍}) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ {𝑍})))
17	15, 16	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑍}) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ {𝑍})))
18	14, 17	bitr4d 285	. 2 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∖ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑍})))
19	18	eqrdv 2761	1 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (dom 𝐹 ∖ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) = (◡𝐹 “ {𝑍}))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143   ≠ wne 2958   ∖ cdif 3902  {csn 4589  ^◡ccnv 5660  dom cdm 5661   “ cima 5664  Fun wfun 6530   Fn wfn 6531  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7410   supp csupp 8152

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3745  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-pw 4564  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7413  df-oprab 7414  df-mpo 7415  df-supp 8153

This theorem is used by:  fressupp  33042  supppreima  33045