Theorem brfullfun 36170

Description: A binary relation form condition for the full function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
brfullfun.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
brfullfun.2	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brfullfun	⊢ (𝐴FullFun𝐹𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 = (𝐹‘𝐴))

Proof of Theorem brfullfun

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqcom 2744	. 2 ⊢ ((FullFun𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 = (FullFun𝐹‘𝐴))
2		fullfunfnv 36168	. . 3 ⊢ FullFun𝐹 Fn V
3		brfullfun.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
4		fnbrfvb 6894	. . 3 ⊢ ((FullFun𝐹 Fn V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) → ((FullFun𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴FullFun𝐹𝐵))
5	2, 3, 4	mp2an 693	. 2 ⊢ ((FullFun𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴FullFun𝐹𝐵)
6		fullfunfv 36169	. . 3 ⊢ (FullFun𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴)
7	6	eqeq2i 2750	. 2 ⊢ (𝐵 = (FullFun𝐹‘𝐴) ↔ 𝐵 = (𝐹‘𝐴))
8	1, 5, 7	3bitr3i 301	1 ⊢ (𝐴FullFun𝐹𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 = (𝐹‘𝐴))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  Vcvv 3442   class class class wbr 5100   Fn wfn 6497  ‘cfv 6502  FullFuncfullfn 36070

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5245  ax-nul 5255  ax-pr 5381  ax-un 7692

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-rab 3402  df-v 3444  df-dif 3906  df-un 3908  df-in 3910  df-ss 3920  df-symdif 4207  df-nul 4288  df-if 4482  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589  df-uni 4866  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-mpt 5182  df-id 5529  df-eprel 5534  df-xp 5640  df-rel 5641  df-cnv 5642  df-co 5643  df-dm 5644  df-rn 5645  df-res 5646  df-ima 5647  df-iota 6458  df-fun 6504  df-fn 6505  df-f 6506  df-fo 6508  df-fv 6510  df-1st 7945  df-2nd 7946  df-txp 36074  df-singleton 36082  df-singles 36083  df-image 36084  df-funpart 36094  df-fullfun 36095

This theorem is referenced by:  dfrecs2  36172  dfrdg4  36173