Theorem scottexf 39292

Description: A version of scottex 9960 with nonfree variables instead of distinct variables. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Aug-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
scottexf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
scottexf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
scottexf	⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} ∈ V

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem scottexf

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		scottexf.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
2		nfcv 2926	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐴
3		nfv 1949	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)
4		nfv 1949	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)
5		fveq2 6908	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (rank‘𝑦) = (rank‘𝑧))
6	5	sseq2d 3945	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ((rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)))
7	1, 2, 3, 4, 6	cbvralfw 3306	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧))
8	7	rabbii 3421	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)}
9		nfcv 2926	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝐴
10		scottexf.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
11		nfv 1949	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)
12	10, 11	nfralw 3313	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)
13		nfv 1949	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)
14		fveq2 6908	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → (rank‘𝑤) = (rank‘𝑥))
15	14	sseq1d 3944	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → ((rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧) ↔ (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)))
16	15	ralbidv 3189	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)))
17	9, 10, 12, 13, 16	cbvrabw 3450	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)}
18	8, 17	eqtr4i 2789	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)}
19		df-scott 9956	. . 3 ⊢ Scott 𝐴 = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)}
20		scottex 9960	. . 3 ⊢ Scott 𝐴 ∈ V
21	19, 20	eqeltrri 2861	. 2 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)} ∈ V
22	18, 21	eqeltri 2860	1 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} ∈ V

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ∈ wcel 2147  Ⅎwnfc 2911  ∀wral 3080  {crab 3416  Vcvv 3454   ⊆ wss 3900  ‘cfv 6558  rankcrnk 9794  Scott cscott 9955

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5235  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7775  ax-reg 9613  ax-inf2 9669

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-pss 4017  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-int 4911  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-tr 5216  df-id 5550  df-eprel 5555  df-po 5563  df-so 5564  df-fr 5608  df-we 5610  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-pred 6322  df-ord 6383  df-on 6384  df-lim 6385  df-suc 6386  df-iota 6512  df-fun 6560  df-fn 6561  df-f 6562  df-f1 6563  df-fo 6564  df-f1o 6565  df-fv 6566  df-ov 7446  df-om 7902  df-2nd 8026  df-frecs 8327  df-wrecs 8358  df-recs 8407  df-rdg 8446  df-r1 9795  df-rank 9796  df-scott 9956

This theorem is used by: (None)