Theorem scott0f 39367

Description: A version of scott0b 9974 with nonfree variables instead of distinct variables. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Aug-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
scott0f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
scott0f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
scott0f	⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = ∅)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem scott0f

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-scott 9966	. . 3 ⊢ Scott 𝐴 = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)}
2	1	eqeq1i 2768	. 2 ⊢ (Scott 𝐴 = ∅ ↔ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)} = ∅)
3		scott0b 9974	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ Scott 𝐴 = ∅)
4		scott0f.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
5		nfcv 2926	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐴
6		nfv 1949	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)
7		nfv 1949	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)
8		fveq2 6916	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (rank‘𝑦) = (rank‘𝑧))
9	8	sseq2d 3945	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ((rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)))
10	4, 5, 6, 7, 9	cbvralfw 3306	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧))
11	10	rabbii 3421	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)}
12		nfcv 2926	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝐴
13		scott0f.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
14		nfv 1949	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)
15	13, 14	nfralw 3313	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)
16		nfv 1949	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)
17		fveq2 6916	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → (rank‘𝑤) = (rank‘𝑥))
18	17	sseq1d 3944	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → ((rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧) ↔ (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)))
19	18	ralbidv 3189	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)))
20	12, 13, 15, 16, 19	cbvrabw 3450	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)}
21	11, 20	eqtr4i 2789	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)}
22	21	eqeq1i 2768	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = ∅ ↔ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)} = ∅)
23	2, 3, 22	3bitr4i 306	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = ∅)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1570  Ⅎwnfc 2911  ∀wral 3080  {crab 3416   ⊆ wss 3900  ∅c0 4281  ‘cfv 6566  rankcrnk 9804  Scott cscott 9965

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5266  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7783

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-pss 4017  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-uni 4873  df-int 4913  df-iun 4958  df-iin 4959  df-br 5109  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-tr 5219  df-id 5553  df-eprel 5558  df-po 5566  df-so 5567  df-fr 5611  df-we 5613  df-xp 5664  df-rel 5665  df-cnv 5666  df-co 5667  df-dm 5668  df-rn 5669  df-res 5670  df-ima 5671  df-pred 6330  df-ord 6391  df-on 6392  df-lim 6393  df-suc 6394  df-iota 6520  df-fun 6568  df-fn 6569  df-f 6570  df-f1 6571  df-fo 6572  df-f1o 6573  df-fv 6574  df-ov 7454  df-om 7912  df-2nd 8036  df-frecs 8337  df-wrecs 8368  df-recs 8417  df-rdg 8456  df-r1 9805  df-rank 9806  df-scott 9966

This theorem is used by:  scottn0f  39368