Theorem scott0f 38366

Description: A version of scott0 9798 with nonfree variables instead of distinct variables. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Aug-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
scott0f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
scott0f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
scott0f	⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = ∅)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem scott0f

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		scott0 9798	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)} = ∅)
2		scott0f.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
3		nfcv 2898	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐴
4		nfv 1915	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)
5		nfv 1915	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)
6		fveq2 6834	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (rank‘𝑦) = (rank‘𝑧))
7	6	sseq2d 3966	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ((rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)))
8	2, 3, 4, 5, 7	cbvralfw 3276	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧))
9	8	rabbii 3404	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)}
10		nfcv 2898	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝐴
11		scott0f.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
12		nfv 1915	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)
13	11, 12	nfralw 3283	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)
14		nfv 1915	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)
15		fveq2 6834	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → (rank‘𝑤) = (rank‘𝑥))
16	15	sseq1d 3965	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → ((rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧) ↔ (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)))
17	16	ralbidv 3159	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)))
18	10, 11, 13, 14, 17	cbvrabw 3434	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)}
19	9, 18	eqtr4i 2762	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)}
20	19	eqeq1i 2741	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = ∅ ↔ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)} = ∅)
21	1, 20	bitr4i 278	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = ∅)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   = wceq 1541  Ⅎwnfc 2883  ∀wral 3051  {crab 3399   ⊆ wss 3901  ∅c0 4285  ‘cfv 6492  rankcrnk 9675

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2146  ax-11 2162  ax-12 2184  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5241  ax-nul 5251  ax-pow 5310  ax-pr 5377  ax-un 7680

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-reu 3351  df-rab 3400  df-v 3442  df-sbc 3741  df-csb 3850  df-dif 3904  df-un 3906  df-in 3908  df-ss 3918  df-pss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4480  df-pw 4556  df-sn 4581  df-pr 4583  df-op 4587  df-uni 4864  df-int 4903  df-iun 4948  df-iin 4949  df-br 5099  df-opab 5161  df-mpt 5180  df-tr 5206  df-id 5519  df-eprel 5524  df-po 5532  df-so 5533  df-fr 5577  df-we 5579  df-xp 5630  df-rel 5631  df-cnv 5632  df-co 5633  df-dm 5634  df-rn 5635  df-res 5636  df-ima 5637  df-pred 6259  df-ord 6320  df-on 6321  df-lim 6322  df-suc 6323  df-iota 6448  df-fun 6494  df-fn 6495  df-f 6496  df-f1 6497  df-fo 6498  df-f1o 6499  df-fv 6500  df-ov 7361  df-om 7809  df-2nd 7934  df-frecs 8223  df-wrecs 8254  df-recs 8303  df-rdg 8341  df-r1 9676  df-rank 9677

This theorem is referenced by:  scottn0f  38367