Theorem scott0f 38490

Description: A version of scott0 9810 with nonfree variables instead of distinct variables. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Aug-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
scott0f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
scott0f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
scott0f	⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = ∅)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem scott0f

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		scott0 9810	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)} = ∅)
2		scott0f.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
3		nfcv 2898	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐴
4		nfv 1916	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)
5		nfv 1916	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)
6		fveq2 6840	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (rank‘𝑦) = (rank‘𝑧))
7	6	sseq2d 3954	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ((rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)))
8	2, 3, 4, 5, 7	cbvralfw 3277	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧))
9	8	rabbii 3394	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)}
10		nfcv 2898	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝐴
11		scott0f.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
12		nfv 1916	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)
13	11, 12	nfralw 3284	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)
14		nfv 1916	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)
15		fveq2 6840	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → (rank‘𝑤) = (rank‘𝑥))
16	15	sseq1d 3953	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → ((rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧) ↔ (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)))
17	16	ralbidv 3160	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)))
18	10, 11, 13, 14, 17	cbvrabw 3424	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)}
19	9, 18	eqtr4i 2762	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)}
20	19	eqeq1i 2741	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = ∅ ↔ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)} = ∅)
21	1, 20	bitr4i 278	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = ∅)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   = wceq 1542  Ⅎwnfc 2883  ∀wral 3051  {crab 3389   ⊆ wss 3889  ∅c0 4273  ‘cfv 6498  rankcrnk 9687

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5231  ax-nul 5241  ax-pow 5307  ax-pr 5375  ax-un 7689

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3062  df-reu 3343  df-rab 3390  df-v 3431  df-sbc 3729  df-csb 3838  df-dif 3892  df-un 3894  df-in 3896  df-ss 3906  df-pss 3909  df-nul 4274  df-if 4467  df-pw 4543  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-uni 4851  df-int 4890  df-iun 4935  df-iin 4936  df-br 5086  df-opab 5148  df-mpt 5167  df-tr 5193  df-id 5526  df-eprel 5531  df-po 5539  df-so 5540  df-fr 5584  df-we 5586  df-xp 5637  df-rel 5638  df-cnv 5639  df-co 5640  df-dm 5641  df-rn 5642  df-res 5643  df-ima 5644  df-pred 6265  df-ord 6326  df-on 6327  df-lim 6328  df-suc 6329  df-iota 6454  df-fun 6500  df-fn 6501  df-f 6502  df-f1 6503  df-fo 6504  df-f1o 6505  df-fv 6506  df-ov 7370  df-om 7818  df-2nd 7943  df-frecs 8231  df-wrecs 8262  df-recs 8311  df-rdg 8349  df-r1 9688  df-rank 9689

This theorem is referenced by:  scottn0f  38491