Theorem scott0f 38543

Description: A version of scott0 9808 with nonfree variables instead of distinct variables. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Aug-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
scott0f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
scott0f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
scott0f	⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = ∅)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem scott0f

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		scott0 9808	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)} = ∅)
2		scott0f.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
3		nfcv 2902	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐴
4		nfv 1921	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)
5		nfv 1921	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)
6		fveq2 6834	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (rank‘𝑦) = (rank‘𝑧))
7	6	sseq2d 3954	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ((rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)))
8	2, 3, 4, 5, 7	cbvralfw 3280	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧))
9	8	rabbii 3397	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)}
10		nfcv 2902	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝐴
11		scott0f.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
12		nfv 1921	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)
13	11, 12	nfralw 3287	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)
14		nfv 1921	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)
15		fveq2 6834	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → (rank‘𝑤) = (rank‘𝑥))
16	15	sseq1d 3953	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → ((rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧) ↔ (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)))
17	16	ralbidv 3163	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)))
18	10, 11, 13, 14, 17	cbvrabw 3427	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)}
19	9, 18	eqtr4i 2766	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)}
20	19	eqeq1i 2745	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = ∅ ↔ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑤) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)} = ∅)
21	1, 20	bitr4i 279	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = ∅)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 207   = wceq 1547  Ⅎwnfc 2887  ∀wral 3054  {crab 3392   ⊆ wss 3890  ∅c0 4268  ‘cfv 6492  rankcrnk 9685

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-10 2152  ax-11 2168  ax-12 2189  ax-ext 2712  ax-sep 5225  ax-nul 5235  ax-pow 5301  ax-pr 5369  ax-un 7685

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 854  df-3or 1093  df-3an 1094  df-tru 1550  df-fal 1560  df-ex 1787  df-nf 1791  df-sb 2074  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2573  df-clab 2719  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2815  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2936  df-ral 3055  df-rex 3065  df-reu 3346  df-rab 3393  df-v 3434  df-sbc 3731  df-csb 3839  df-dif 3893  df-un 3895  df-in 3897  df-ss 3907  df-pss 3910  df-nul 4269  df-if 4462  df-pw 4538  df-sn 4563  df-pr 4565  df-op 4569  df-uni 4846  df-int 4885  df-iun 4930  df-iin 4931  df-br 5080  df-opab 5142  df-mpt 5161  df-tr 5187  df-id 5520  df-eprel 5525  df-po 5533  df-so 5534  df-fr 5578  df-we 5580  df-xp 5631  df-rel 5632  df-cnv 5633  df-co 5634  df-dm 5635  df-rn 5636  df-res 5637  df-ima 5638  df-pred 6259  df-ord 6320  df-on 6321  df-lim 6322  df-suc 6323  df-iota 6448  df-fun 6494  df-fn 6495  df-f 6496  df-f1 6497  df-fo 6498  df-f1o 6499  df-fv 6500  df-ov 7366  df-om 7814  df-2nd 7939  df-frecs 8228  df-wrecs 8259  df-recs 8308  df-rdg 8346  df-r1 9686  df-rank 9687

This theorem is referenced by:  scottn0f  38544