Theorem scottexs 9928

Description: Theorem scheme version of scottex 9926. The collection of all 𝑥 of minimum rank such that 𝜑(𝑥) is true, is a set. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
scottexs	⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ∈ V

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem scottexs

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcv 2904	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
2		nfab1 2906	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
3		nfv 1913	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)
4	2, 3	nfralw 3310	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)
5		nfv 1913	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)
6		fveq2 6905	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (rank‘𝑧) = (rank‘𝑥))
7	6	sseq1d 4014	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ((rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))
8	7	ralbidv 3177	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))
9	1, 2, 4, 5, 8	cbvrabw 3472	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)}
10		df-rab 3436	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))}
11		abid 2717	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
12		df-ral 3061	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))
13		df-sbc 3788	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
14	13	imbi1i 349	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))
15	14	albii 1818	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))
16	12, 15	bitr4i 278	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))
17	11, 16	anbi12i 628	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))))
18	17	abbii 2808	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))}
19	9, 10, 18	3eqtri 2768	. 2 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))}
20		scottex 9926	. 2 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} ∈ V
21	19, 20	eqeltrri 2837	1 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ∈ V

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1537   ∈ wcel 2107  {cab 2713  ∀wral 3060  {crab 3435  Vcvv 3479  [wsbc 3787   ⊆ wss 3950  ‘cfv 6560  rankcrnk 9804

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1794  ax-4 1808  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2006  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2140  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2176  ax-ext 2707  ax-rep 5278  ax-sep 5295  ax-nul 5305  ax-pow 5364  ax-pr 5431  ax-un 7756  ax-reg 9633  ax-inf2 9682

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1779  df-nf 1783  df-sb 2064  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2815  df-nfc 2891  df-ne 2940  df-ral 3061  df-rex 3070  df-reu 3380  df-rab 3436  df-v 3481  df-sbc 3788  df-csb 3899  df-dif 3953  df-un 3955  df-in 3957  df-ss 3967  df-pss 3970  df-nul 4333  df-if 4525  df-pw 4601  df-sn 4626  df-pr 4628  df-op 4632  df-uni 4907  df-int 4946  df-iun 4992  df-br 5143  df-opab 5205  df-mpt 5225  df-tr 5259  df-id 5577  df-eprel 5583  df-po 5591  df-so 5592  df-fr 5636  df-we 5638  df-xp 5690  df-rel 5691  df-cnv 5692  df-co 5693  df-dm 5694  df-rn 5695  df-res 5696  df-ima 5697  df-pred 6320  df-ord 6386  df-on 6387  df-lim 6388  df-suc 6389  df-iota 6513  df-fun 6562  df-fn 6563  df-f 6564  df-f1 6565  df-fo 6566  df-f1o 6567  df-fv 6568  df-ov 7435  df-om 7889  df-2nd 8016  df-frecs 8307  df-wrecs 8338  df-recs 8412  df-rdg 8451  df-r1 9805  df-rank 9806

This theorem is referenced by:  hta  9938