Theorem scottexs 9925

Description: Theorem scheme version of scottex 9923. The collection of all 𝑥 of minimum rank such that 𝜑(𝑥) is true, is a set. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
scottexs	⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ∈ V

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem scottexs

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcv 2903	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
2		nfab1 2905	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
3		nfv 1912	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)
4	2, 3	nfralw 3309	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)
5		nfv 1912	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)
6		fveq2 6907	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (rank‘𝑧) = (rank‘𝑥))
7	6	sseq1d 4027	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ((rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))
8	7	ralbidv 3176	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))
9	1, 2, 4, 5, 8	cbvrabw 3471	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)}
10		df-rab 3434	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))}
11		abid 2716	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
12		df-ral 3060	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))
13		df-sbc 3792	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
14	13	imbi1i 349	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))
15	14	albii 1816	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))
16	12, 15	bitr4i 278	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))
17	11, 16	anbi12i 628	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))))
18	17	abbii 2807	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))}
19	9, 10, 18	3eqtri 2767	. 2 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))}
20		scottex 9923	. 2 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} ∈ V
21	19, 20	eqeltrri 2836	1 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ∈ V

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1535   ∈ wcel 2106  {cab 2712  ∀wral 3059  {crab 3433  Vcvv 3478  [wsbc 3791   ⊆ wss 3963  ‘cfv 6563  rankcrnk 9801

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-6 1965  ax-7 2005  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2706  ax-rep 5285  ax-sep 5302  ax-nul 5312  ax-pow 5371  ax-pr 5438  ax-un 7754  ax-reg 9630  ax-inf2 9679

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2063  df-mo 2538  df-eu 2567  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2890  df-ne 2939  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-reu 3379  df-rab 3434  df-v 3480  df-sbc 3792  df-csb 3909  df-dif 3966  df-un 3968  df-in 3970  df-ss 3980  df-pss 3983  df-nul 4340  df-if 4532  df-pw 4607  df-sn 4632  df-pr 4634  df-op 4638  df-uni 4913  df-int 4952  df-iun 4998  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-tr 5266  df-id 5583  df-eprel 5589  df-po 5597  df-so 5598  df-fr 5641  df-we 5643  df-xp 5695  df-rel 5696  df-cnv 5697  df-co 5698  df-dm 5699  df-rn 5700  df-res 5701  df-ima 5702  df-pred 6323  df-ord 6389  df-on 6390  df-lim 6391  df-suc 6392  df-iota 6516  df-fun 6565  df-fn 6566  df-f 6567  df-f1 6568  df-fo 6569  df-f1o 6570  df-fv 6571  df-ov 7434  df-om 7888  df-2nd 8014  df-frecs 8305  df-wrecs 8336  df-recs 8410  df-rdg 8449  df-r1 9802  df-rank 9803

This theorem is referenced by:  hta  9935