Theorem scottexs 9811

Description: Theorem scheme version of scottex 9809. The collection of all 𝑥 of minimum rank such that 𝜑(𝑥) is true, is a set. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
scottexs	⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ∈ V

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem scottexs

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcv 2899	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
2		nfab1 2901	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
3		nfv 1916	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)
4	2, 3	nfralw 3285	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)
5		nfv 1916	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)
6		fveq2 6841	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (rank‘𝑧) = (rank‘𝑥))
7	6	sseq1d 3954	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ((rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))
8	7	ralbidv 3161	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))
9	1, 2, 4, 5, 8	cbvrabw 3425	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)}
10		df-rab 3391	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))}
11		abid 2719	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
12		df-ral 3053	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))
13		df-sbc 3730	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
14	13	imbi1i 349	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))
15	14	albii 1821	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))
16	12, 15	bitr4i 278	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))
17	11, 16	anbi12i 629	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))))
18	17	abbii 2804	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))}
19	9, 10, 18	3eqtri 2764	. 2 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))}
20		scottex 9809	. 2 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} ∈ V
21	19, 20	eqeltrri 2834	1 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ∈ V

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1540   ∈ wcel 2114  {cab 2715  ∀wral 3052  {crab 3390  Vcvv 3430  [wsbc 3729   ⊆ wss 3890  ‘cfv 6499  rankcrnk 9687

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5213  ax-sep 5232  ax-nul 5242  ax-pow 5308  ax-pr 5376  ax-un 7689  ax-reg 9507  ax-inf2 9562

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-reu 3344  df-rab 3391  df-v 3432  df-sbc 3730  df-csb 3839  df-dif 3893  df-un 3895  df-in 3897  df-ss 3907  df-pss 3910  df-nul 4275  df-if 4468  df-pw 4544  df-sn 4569  df-pr 4571  df-op 4575  df-uni 4852  df-int 4891  df-iun 4936  df-br 5087  df-opab 5149  df-mpt 5168  df-tr 5194  df-id 5526  df-eprel 5531  df-po 5539  df-so 5540  df-fr 5584  df-we 5586  df-xp 5637  df-rel 5638  df-cnv 5639  df-co 5640  df-dm 5641  df-rn 5642  df-res 5643  df-ima 5644  df-pred 6266  df-ord 6327  df-on 6328  df-lim 6329  df-suc 6330  df-iota 6455  df-fun 6501  df-fn 6502  df-f 6503  df-f1 6504  df-fo 6505  df-f1o 6506  df-fv 6507  df-ov 7370  df-om 7818  df-2nd 7943  df-frecs 8231  df-wrecs 8262  df-recs 8311  df-rdg 8349  df-r1 9688  df-rank 9689

This theorem is referenced by:  hta  9821