Theorem dfxrn2 38332

Description: Alternate definition of the range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Feb-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfxrn2	⊢ (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑢,𝑅,𝑥,𝑦   𝑢,𝑆,𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem dfxrn2

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		xrnrel 38329	. . 3 ⊢ Rel (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)
2		dfrel4v 6221	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ↔ (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = {⟨𝑢, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧})
3	1, 2	mpbi 230	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = {⟨𝑢, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧}
4		breq2 5170	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧 ↔ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
5		brxrn2 38331	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V → (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)))
6	5	elv 3493	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦))
7		brxrn 38330	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V) → (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)))
8	7	el3v 3496	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦))
9	8	anbi2i 622	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)))
10		3anass 1095	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)))
11	9, 10	bitr4i 278	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦))
12	11	2exbii 1847	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦))
13	4	copsex2gb 5830	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧))
14	6, 12, 13	3bitr2i 299	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧))
15	14	simplbi 497	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧 → 𝑧 ∈ (V × V))
16	4, 15	cnvoprab 8101	. 2 ⊢ ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩} = {⟨𝑢, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧}
17	8	oprabbii 7517	. . 3 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}
18	17	cnveqi 5899	. 2 ⊢ ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩} = ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}
19	3, 16, 18	3eqtr2i 2774	1 ⊢ (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1537  ∃wex 1777   ∈ wcel 2108  Vcvv 3488  ⟨cop 4654   class class class wbr 5166  {copab 5228   × cxp 5698  ^◡ccnv 5699  Rel wrel 5705  {coprab 7449   ⋉ cxrn 38134

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pr 5447  ax-un 7770

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-sbc 3805  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-mpt 5250  df-id 5593  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-rn 5711  df-res 5712  df-iota 6525  df-fun 6575  df-fn 6576  df-f 6577  df-fo 6579  df-fv 6581  df-oprab 7452  df-1st 8030  df-2nd 8031  df-xrn 38327

This theorem is referenced by: (None)