Theorem dfxrn2 38377

Description: Alternate definition of the range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Feb-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfxrn2	⊢ (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑢,𝑅,𝑥,𝑦   𝑢,𝑆,𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem dfxrn2

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		xrnrel 38374	. . 3 ⊢ Rel (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)
2		dfrel4v 6210	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ↔ (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = {⟨𝑢, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧})
3	1, 2	mpbi 230	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = {⟨𝑢, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧}
4		breq2 5147	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧 ↔ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
5		brxrn2 38376	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V → (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)))
6	5	elv 3485	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦))
7		brxrn 38375	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V) → (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)))
8	7	el3v 3488	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦))
9	8	anbi2i 623	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)))
10		3anass 1095	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)))
11	9, 10	bitr4i 278	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦))
12	11	2exbii 1849	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦))
13	4	copsex2gb 5816	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧))
14	6, 12, 13	3bitr2i 299	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧))
15	14	simplbi 497	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧 → 𝑧 ∈ (V × V))
16	4, 15	cnvoprab 8085	. 2 ⊢ ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩} = {⟨𝑢, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧}
17	8	oprabbii 7500	. . 3 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}
18	17	cnveqi 5885	. 2 ⊢ ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩} = ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}
19	3, 16, 18	3eqtr2i 2771	1 ⊢ (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1540  ∃wex 1779   ∈ wcel 2108  Vcvv 3480  ⟨cop 4632   class class class wbr 5143  {copab 5205   × cxp 5683  ^◡ccnv 5684  Rel wrel 5690  {coprab 7432   ⋉ cxrn 38181

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5296  ax-nul 5306  ax-pr 5432  ax-un 7755

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2892  df-ne 2941  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3437  df-v 3482  df-sbc 3789  df-dif 3954  df-un 3956  df-in 3958  df-ss 3968  df-nul 4334  df-if 4526  df-sn 4627  df-pr 4629  df-op 4633  df-uni 4908  df-br 5144  df-opab 5206  df-mpt 5226  df-id 5578  df-xp 5691  df-rel 5692  df-cnv 5693  df-co 5694  df-dm 5695  df-rn 5696  df-res 5697  df-iota 6514  df-fun 6563  df-fn 6564  df-f 6565  df-fo 6567  df-fv 6569  df-oprab 7435  df-1st 8014  df-2nd 8015  df-xrn 38372

This theorem is referenced by: (None)