Theorem dfxrn2 37709

Description: Alternate definition of the range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Feb-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfxrn2	⊢ (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑢,𝑅,𝑥,𝑦   𝑢,𝑆,𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem dfxrn2

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		xrnrel 37706	. . 3 ⊢ Rel (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)
2		dfrel4v 6189	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ↔ (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = {⟨𝑢, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧})
3	1, 2	mpbi 229	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = {⟨𝑢, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧}
4		breq2 5152	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧 ↔ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
5		brxrn2 37708	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V → (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)))
6	5	elv 3479	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦))
7		brxrn 37707	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V) → (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)))
8	7	el3v 37549	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦))
9	8	anbi2i 622	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)))
10		3anass 1094	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)))
11	9, 10	bitr4i 278	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦))
12	11	2exbii 1850	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦))
13	4	copsex2gb 5806	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧))
14	6, 12, 13	3bitr2i 299	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧))
15	14	simplbi 497	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧 → 𝑧 ∈ (V × V))
16	4, 15	cnvoprab 8050	. 2 ⊢ ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩} = {⟨𝑢, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧}
17	8	oprabbii 7479	. . 3 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}
18	17	cnveqi 5874	. 2 ⊢ ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩} = ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}
19	3, 16, 18	3eqtr2i 2765	1 ⊢ (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1540  ∃wex 1780   ∈ wcel 2105  Vcvv 3473  ⟨cop 4634   class class class wbr 5148  {copab 5210   × cxp 5674  ^◡ccnv 5675  Rel wrel 5681  {coprab 7413   ⋉ cxrn 37505

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2136  ax-11 2153  ax-12 2170  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5299  ax-nul 5306  ax-pr 5427  ax-un 7729

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2067  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2809  df-nfc 2884  df-ne 2940  df-ral 3061  df-rex 3070  df-rab 3432  df-v 3475  df-sbc 3778  df-dif 3951  df-un 3953  df-in 3955  df-ss 3965  df-nul 4323  df-if 4529  df-sn 4629  df-pr 4631  df-op 4635  df-uni 4909  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-id 5574  df-xp 5682  df-rel 5683  df-cnv 5684  df-co 5685  df-dm 5686  df-rn 5687  df-res 5688  df-iota 6495  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-fo 6549  df-fv 6551  df-oprab 7416  df-1st 7979  df-2nd 7980  df-xrn 37704

This theorem is referenced by: (None)