Theorem dfxrn2 36506

Description: Alternate definition of the range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Feb-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfxrn2	⊢ (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑢,𝑅,𝑥,𝑦   𝑢,𝑆,𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem dfxrn2

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		xrnrel 36503	. . 3 ⊢ Rel (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)
2		dfrel4v 6093	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ↔ (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = {⟨𝑢, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧})
3	1, 2	mpbi 229	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = {⟨𝑢, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧}
4		breq2 5078	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧 ↔ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
5		brxrn2 36505	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V → (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)))
6	5	elv 3438	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦))
7		brxrn 36504	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V) → (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)))
8	7	el3v 36371	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦))
9	8	anbi2i 623	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)))
10		3anass 1094	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)))
11	9, 10	bitr4i 277	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦))
12	11	2exbii 1851	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦))
13	4	copsex2gb 5716	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧))
14	6, 12, 13	3bitr2i 299	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧))
15	14	simplbi 498	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧 → 𝑧 ∈ (V × V))
16	4, 15	cnvoprab 7900	. 2 ⊢ ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩} = {⟨𝑢, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑧}
17	8	oprabbii 7342	. . 3 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}
18	17	cnveqi 5783	. 2 ⊢ ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩} = ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}
19	3, 16, 18	3eqtr2i 2772	1 ⊢ (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1539  ∃wex 1782   ∈ wcel 2106  Vcvv 3432  ⟨cop 4567   class class class wbr 5074  {copab 5136   × cxp 5587  ^◡ccnv 5588  Rel wrel 5594  {coprab 7276   ⋉ cxrn 36332

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5223  ax-nul 5230  ax-pr 5352  ax-un 7588

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-sbc 3717  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-nul 4257  df-if 4460  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-op 4568  df-uni 4840  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-mpt 5158  df-id 5489  df-xp 5595  df-rel 5596  df-cnv 5597  df-co 5598  df-dm 5599  df-rn 5600  df-res 5601  df-iota 6391  df-fun 6435  df-fn 6436  df-f 6437  df-fo 6439  df-fv 6441  df-oprab 7279  df-1st 7831  df-2nd 7832  df-xrn 36501

This theorem is referenced by: (None)