Theorem dmscut 27780

Description: The domain of the surreal cut operation is all separated surreal sets. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dmscut	⊢ dom |s = <<s

Proof of Theorem dmscut

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑐 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dmoprab 7515	. 2 ⊢ dom {⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, 𝑐⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))} = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))}
2		df-scut 27752	. . . 4 ⊢ |s = (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No , 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎}) ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))
3		df-mpo 7415	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No , 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎}) ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))) = {⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, 𝑐⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))}
4	2, 3	eqtri 2759	. . 3 ⊢ |s = {⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, 𝑐⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))}
5	4	dmeqi 5889	. 2 ⊢ dom |s = dom {⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, 𝑐⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))}
6		df-sslt 27750	. . . . 5 ⊢ <<s = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 ⊆ No ∧ 𝑏 ⊆ No ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 𝑥 <s 𝑦)}
7	6	relopabiv 5804	. . . 4 ⊢ Rel <<s
8		19.42v 1953	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))) ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ ∃𝑐 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))))
9		ssltss1 27757	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑎 <<s 𝑏 → 𝑎 ⊆ No )
10		velpw 4585	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ↔ 𝑎 ⊆ No )
11	9, 10	sylibr 234	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑎 <<s 𝑏 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No )
12	11	pm4.71ri 560	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑎 <<s 𝑏 ↔ (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑎 <<s 𝑏))
13		vex 3468	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
14		vex 3468	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑏 ∈ V
15	13, 14	elimasn 6082	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎}) ↔ ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∈ <<s )
16		df-br 5125	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑎 <<s 𝑏 ↔ ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∈ <<s )
17	15, 16	bitr4i 278	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎}) ↔ 𝑎 <<s 𝑏)
18	17	anbi2i 623	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ↔ (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑎 <<s 𝑏))
19		riotaex 7371	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})) ∈ V
20	19	isseti 3482	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ∃𝑐 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))
21	20	biantru 529	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ ∃𝑐 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))))
22	12, 18, 21	3bitr2i 299	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 <<s 𝑏 ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ ∃𝑐 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))))
23	8, 22, 16	3bitr2ri 300	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∈ <<s ↔ ∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))))
24	23	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (⊤ → (⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∈ <<s ↔ ∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))))
25	7, 24	opabbi2dv 5834	. . 3 ⊢ (⊤ → <<s = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))})
26	25	mptru 1547	. 2 ⊢ <<s = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))}
27	1, 5, 26	3eqtr4i 2769	1 ⊢ dom |s = <<s

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1540  ⊤wtru 1541  ∃wex 1779   ∈ wcel 2109  ∀wral 3052  {crab 3420   ⊆ wss 3931  𝒫 cpw 4580  {csn 4606  ⟨cop 4612  ∩ cint 4927   class class class wbr 5124  {copab 5186  dom cdm 5659   “ cima 5662  ‘cfv 6536  ℩crio 7366  {coprab 7411   ∈ cmpo 7412   No csur 27608   <s cslt 27609   bday cbday 27610   <<s csslt 27749   |s cscut 27751

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5271  ax-nul 5281  ax-pr 5407

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3062  df-rab 3421  df-v 3466  df-dif 3934  df-un 3936  df-in 3938  df-ss 3948  df-nul 4314  df-if 4506  df-pw 4582  df-sn 4607  df-pr 4609  df-op 4613  df-uni 4889  df-br 5125  df-opab 5187  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-iota 6489  df-riota 7367  df-oprab 7414  df-mpo 7415  df-sslt 27750  df-scut 27752

This theorem is referenced by:  scutf  27781  madeval2  27818