P. 276 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 27501-27600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	lgsquad 27501	The Law of Quadratic Reciprocity, see also theorem 9.8 in [ApostolNT] p. 185. If 𝑃 and 𝑄 are distinct odd primes, then the product of the Legendre symbols (𝑃 /L 𝑄) and (𝑄 /L 𝑃) is the parity of ((𝑃 − 1) / 2) · ((𝑄 − 1) / 2). This uses Eisenstein's proof, which also has a nice geometric interpretation - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proofs_of_quadratic_reciprocity. This is Metamath 100 proof #7. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → ((𝑃 /L 𝑄) · (𝑄 /L 𝑃)) = (-1↑(((𝑃 − 1) / 2) · ((𝑄 − 1) / 2))))
Theorem	lgsquad2lem1 27502	Lemma for lgsquad2 27504. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 /L 𝑁) · (𝑁 /L 𝐴)) = (-1↑(((𝐴 − 1) / 2) · ((𝑁 − 1) / 2))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐵 /L 𝑁) · (𝑁 /L 𝐵)) = (-1↑(((𝐵 − 1) / 2) · ((𝑁 − 1) / 2))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀 /L 𝑁) · (𝑁 /L 𝑀)) = (-1↑(((𝑀 − 1) / 2) · ((𝑁 − 1) / 2))))
Theorem	lgsquad2lem2 27503*	Lemma for lgsquad2 27504. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 1)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑚 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ (𝑚 gcd 𝑁) = 1)) → ((𝑚 /L 𝑁) · (𝑁 /L 𝑚)) = (-1↑(((𝑚 − 1) / 2) · ((𝑁 − 1) / 2))))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (1...𝑘)((𝑥 gcd (2 · 𝑁)) = 1 → ((𝑥 /L 𝑁) · (𝑁 /L 𝑥)) = (-1↑(((𝑥 − 1) / 2) · ((𝑁 − 1) / 2)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀 /L 𝑁) · (𝑁 /L 𝑀)) = (-1↑(((𝑀 − 1) / 2) · ((𝑁 − 1) / 2))))
Theorem	lgsquad2 27504	Extend lgsquad 27501 to coprime odd integers (the domain of the Jacobi symbol). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀 /L 𝑁) · (𝑁 /L 𝑀)) = (-1↑(((𝑀 − 1) / 2) · ((𝑁 − 1) / 2))))
Theorem	lgsquad3 27505	Extend lgsquad2 27504 to integers which share a factor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑀) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁)) → (𝑀 /L 𝑁) = ((-1↑(((𝑀 − 1) / 2) · ((𝑁 − 1) / 2))) · (𝑁 /L 𝑀)))
Theorem	m1lgs 27506	The first supplement to the law of quadratic reciprocity. Negative one is a square mod an odd prime 𝑃 iff 𝑃≡1 (mod 4). See first case of theorem 9.4 in [ApostolNT] p. 181. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) → ((-1 /L 𝑃) = 1 ↔ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1))
Theorem	2lgslem1a1 27507*	Lemma 1 for 2lgslem1a 27509. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑃) → ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...((𝑃 − 1) / 2))(𝑖 · 2) = ((𝑖 · 2) mod 𝑃))
Theorem	2lgslem1a2 27508	Lemma 2 for 2lgslem1a 27509. (Contributed by AV, 18-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℤ) → ((⌊‘(𝑁 / 4)) < 𝐼 ↔ (𝑁 / 2) < (𝐼 · 2)))
Theorem	2lgslem1a 27509*	Lemma 1 for 2lgslem1 27512. (Contributed by AV, 18-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑃) → {𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ (1...((𝑃 − 1) / 2))(𝑥 = (𝑖 · 2) ∧ (𝑃 / 2) < (𝑥 mod 𝑃))} = {𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ (((⌊‘(𝑃 / 4)) + 1)...((𝑃 − 1) / 2))𝑥 = (𝑖 · 2)})
Theorem	2lgslem1b 27510*	Lemma 2 for 2lgslem1 27512. (Contributed by AV, 18-Jun-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐴...𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ (𝑗 · 2))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:𝐼–1-1-onto→{𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 𝑥 = (𝑖 · 2)}
Theorem	2lgslem1c 27511	Lemma 3 for 2lgslem1 27512. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑃) → (⌊‘(𝑃 / 4)) ≤ ((𝑃 − 1) / 2))
Theorem	2lgslem1 27512*	Lemma 1 for 2lgs 27525. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑃) → (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ (1...((𝑃 − 1) / 2))(𝑥 = (𝑖 · 2) ∧ (𝑃 / 2) < (𝑥 mod 𝑃))}) = (((𝑃 − 1) / 2) − (⌊‘(𝑃 / 4))))
Theorem	2lgslem2 27513	Lemma 2 for 2lgs 27525. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jun-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (((𝑃 − 1) / 2) − (⌊‘(𝑃 / 4)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑃) → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	2lgslem3a 27514	Lemma for 2lgslem3a1 27518. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (((𝑃 − 1) / 2) − (⌊‘(𝑃 / 4)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑃 = ((8 · 𝐾) + 1)) → 𝑁 = (2 · 𝐾))
Theorem	2lgslem3b 27515	Lemma for 2lgslem3b1 27519. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (((𝑃 − 1) / 2) − (⌊‘(𝑃 / 4)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑃 = ((8 · 𝐾) + 3)) → 𝑁 = ((2 · 𝐾) + 1))
Theorem	2lgslem3c 27516	Lemma for 2lgslem3c1 27520. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (((𝑃 − 1) / 2) − (⌊‘(𝑃 / 4)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑃 = ((8 · 𝐾) + 5)) → 𝑁 = ((2 · 𝐾) + 1))
Theorem	2lgslem3d 27517	Lemma for 2lgslem3d1 27521. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (((𝑃 − 1) / 2) − (⌊‘(𝑃 / 4)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑃 = ((8 · 𝐾) + 7)) → 𝑁 = ((2 · 𝐾) + 2))
Theorem	2lgslem3a1 27518	Lemma 1 for 2lgslem3 27522. (Contributed by AV, 15-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (((𝑃 − 1) / 2) − (⌊‘(𝑃 / 4)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 mod 8) = 1) → (𝑁 mod 2) = 0)
Theorem	2lgslem3b1 27519	Lemma 2 for 2lgslem3 27522. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (((𝑃 − 1) / 2) − (⌊‘(𝑃 / 4)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 mod 8) = 3) → (𝑁 mod 2) = 1)
Theorem	2lgslem3c1 27520	Lemma 3 for 2lgslem3 27522. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (((𝑃 − 1) / 2) − (⌊‘(𝑃 / 4)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 mod 8) = 5) → (𝑁 mod 2) = 1)
Theorem	2lgslem3d1 27521	Lemma 4 for 2lgslem3 27522. (Contributed by AV, 15-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (((𝑃 − 1) / 2) − (⌊‘(𝑃 / 4)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 mod 8) = 7) → (𝑁 mod 2) = 0)
Theorem	2lgslem3 27522	Lemma 3 for 2lgs 27525. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (((𝑃 − 1) / 2) − (⌊‘(𝑃 / 4)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑃) → (𝑁 mod 2) = if((𝑃 mod 8) ∈ {1, 7}, 0, 1))
Theorem	2lgs2 27523	The Legendre symbol for 2 at 2 is 0. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (2 /L 2) = 0
Theorem	2lgslem4 27524	Lemma 4 for 2lgs 27525: special case of 2lgs 27525 for 𝑃 = 2. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((2 /L 2) = 1 ↔ (2 mod 8) ∈ {1, 7})
Theorem	2lgs 27525	The second supplement to the law of quadratic reciprocity (for the Legendre symbol extended to arbitrary primes as second argument). Two is a square modulo a prime 𝑃 iff 𝑃≡±1 (mod 8), see first case of theorem 9.5 in [ApostolNT] p. 181. This theorem justifies our definition of (𝑁 /L 2) (lgs2 27432) to some degree, by demanding that reciprocity extend to the case 𝑄 = 2. (Proposed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.) (Contributed by AV, 16-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((2 /L 𝑃) = 1 ↔ (𝑃 mod 8) ∈ {1, 7}))
Theorem	2lgsoddprmlem1 27526	Lemma 1 for 2lgsoddprm 27534. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 = ((8 · 𝐴) + 𝐵)) → (((𝑁↑2) − 1) / 8) = (((8 · (𝐴↑2)) + (2 · (𝐴 · 𝐵))) + (((𝐵↑2) − 1) / 8)))
Theorem	2lgsoddprmlem2 27527	Lemma 2 for 2lgsoddprm 27534. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑅 = (𝑁 mod 8)) → (2 ∥ (((𝑁↑2) − 1) / 8) ↔ 2 ∥ (((𝑅↑2) − 1) / 8)))
Theorem	2lgsoddprmlem3a 27528	Lemma 1 for 2lgsoddprmlem3 27532. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (((1↑2) − 1) / 8) = 0
Theorem	2lgsoddprmlem3b 27529	Lemma 2 for 2lgsoddprmlem3 27532. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (((3↑2) − 1) / 8) = 1
Theorem	2lgsoddprmlem3c 27530	Lemma 3 for 2lgsoddprmlem3 27532. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (((5↑2) − 1) / 8) = 3
Theorem	2lgsoddprmlem3d 27531	Lemma 4 for 2lgsoddprmlem3 27532. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (((7↑2) − 1) / 8) = (2 · 3)
Theorem	2lgsoddprmlem3 27532	Lemma 3 for 2lgsoddprm 27534. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑅 = (𝑁 mod 8)) → (2 ∥ (((𝑅↑2) − 1) / 8) ↔ 𝑅 ∈ {1, 7}))
Theorem	2lgsoddprmlem4 27533	Lemma 4 for 2lgsoddprm 27534. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁) → (2 ∥ (((𝑁↑2) − 1) / 8) ↔ (𝑁 mod 8) ∈ {1, 7}))
Theorem	2lgsoddprm 27534	The second supplement to the law of quadratic reciprocity for odd primes (common representation, see theorem 9.5 in [ApostolNT] p. 181): The Legendre symbol for 2 at an odd prime is minus one to the power of the square of the odd prime minus one divided by eight ((2 /L 𝑃) = -1^(((P^2)-1)/8) ). (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) → (2 /L 𝑃) = (-1↑(((𝑃↑2) − 1) / 8)))
14.4.11  All primes 4n+1 are the sum of two squares
Theorem	2sqlem1 27535*	Lemma for 2sq 27548. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ[i] 𝐴 = ((abs‘𝑥)↑2))
Theorem	2sqlem2 27536*	Lemma for 2sq 27548. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝐴 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))
Theorem	mul2sq 27537	Fibonacci's identity (actually due to Diophantus). The product of two sums of two squares is also a sum of two squares. We can take advantage of Gaussian integers here to trivialize the proof. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sqlem3 27538	Lemma for 2sqlem5 27540. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 · 𝑃) = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∥ ((𝐶 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sqlem4 27539	Lemma for 2sqlem5 27540. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 · 𝑃) = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sqlem5 27540	Lemma for 2sq 27548. If a number that is a sum of two squares is divisible by a prime that is a sum of two squares, then the quotient is a sum of two squares. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sqlem6 27541*	Lemma for 2sq 27548. If a number that is a sum of two squares is divisible by a number whose prime divisors are all sums of two squares, then the quotient is a sum of two squares. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ ℙ (𝑝 ∥ 𝐵 → 𝑝 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sqlem7 27542*	Lemma for 2sq 27548. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ((𝑥 gcd 𝑦) = 1 ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑌 ⊆ (𝑆 ∩ ℕ)
Theorem	2sqlem8a 27543*	Lemma for 2sqlem8 27544. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2016.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ((𝑥 gcd 𝑦) = 1 ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ (1...(𝑀 − 1))∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑌 (𝑏 ∥ 𝑎 → 𝑏 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 gcd 𝐷) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	2sqlem8 27544*	Lemma for 2sq 27548. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ((𝑥 gcd 𝑦) = 1 ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ (1...(𝑀 − 1))∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑌 (𝑏 ∥ 𝑎 → 𝑏 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐶 / (𝐶 gcd 𝐷))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝐷 / (𝐶 gcd 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sqlem9 27545*	Lemma for 2sq 27548. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ((𝑥 gcd 𝑦) = 1 ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ (1...(𝑀 − 1))∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑌 (𝑏 ∥ 𝑎 → 𝑏 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sqlem10 27546*	Lemma for 2sq 27548. Every factor of a "proper" sum of two squares (where the summands are coprime) is a sum of two squares. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ((𝑥 gcd 𝑦) = 1 ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∥ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sqlem11 27547*	Lemma for 2sq 27548. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ((𝑥 gcd 𝑦) = 1 ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sq 27548*	All primes of the form 4𝑘 + 1 are sums of two squares. This is Metamath 100 proof #20. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝑃 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))
Theorem	2sqblem 27549	Lemma for 2sqb 27550. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℤ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((𝑋↑2) + (𝑌↑2)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 gcd 𝑌) = ((𝑃 · 𝐴) + (𝑌 · 𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 mod 4) = 1)
Theorem	2sqb 27550*	The converse to 2sq 27548. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝑃 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) ↔ (𝑃 = 2 ∨ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1)))
Theorem	2sq2 27551	2 is the sum of squares of two nonnegative integers iff the two integers are 1. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 2 ↔ (𝐴 = 1 ∧ 𝐵 = 1)))
Theorem	2sqn0 27552	If the sum of two squares is prime, none of the original number is zero. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)
Theorem	2sqcoprm 27553	If the sum of two squares is prime, the two original numbers are coprime. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1)
Theorem	2sqmod 27554	Given two decompositions of a prime as a sum of two squares, show that they are equal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2)) = 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))
Theorem	2sqmo 27555*	There exists at most one decomposition of a prime as a sum of two squares. See 2sqb 27550 for the existence of such a decomposition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ∃*𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqnn0 27556*	All primes of the form 4𝑘 + 1 are sums of squares of two nonnegative integers. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 𝑃 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))
Theorem	2sqnn 27557*	All primes of the form 4𝑘 + 1 are sums of squares of two positive integers. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ 𝑃 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))
Theorem	addsq2reu 27558*	For each complex number 𝐶, there exists a unique complex number 𝑎 added to the square of a unique another complex number 𝑏 resulting in the given complex number 𝐶. The unique complex number 𝑎 is 𝐶, and the unique another complex number 𝑏 is 0. Remark: This, together with addsqnreup 27561, is an example showing that the pattern ∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 does not necessarily mean "There are unique sets 𝑎 and 𝑏 fulfilling 𝜑). See also comments for df-eu 2599 and 2eu4 2684. For more details see comment for addsqnreup 27561. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	addsqn2reu 27559*	For each complex number 𝐶, there does not exist a unique complex number 𝑏, squared and added to a unique another complex number 𝑎 resulting in the given complex number 𝐶. Actually, for each complex number 𝑏, 𝑎 = (𝐶 − (𝑏↑2)) is unique. Remark: This, together with addsq2reu 27558, shows that commutation of two unique quantifications need not be equivalent, and provides an evident justification of the fact that considering the pair of variables is necessary to obtain what we intuitively understand as "double unique existence". (Proposed by GL, 23-Jun-2023.). (Contributed by AV, 23-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	addsqrexnreu 27560*	For each complex number, there exists a complex number to which the square of more than one (or no) other complex numbers can be added to result in the given complex number. Remark: This theorem, together with addsq2reu 27558, shows that there are cases in which there is a set together with a not unique other set fulfilling a wff, although there is a unique set fulfilling the wff together with another unique set (see addsq2reu 27558). For more details see comment for addsqnreup 27561. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑎 ∈ ℂ ¬ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	addsqnreup 27561*	There is no unique decomposition of a complex number as a sum of a complex number and a square of a complex number. Remark: This theorem, together with addsq2reu 27558, is a real life example (about a numerical property) showing that the pattern ∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 does not necessarily mean "There are unique sets 𝑎 and 𝑏 fulfilling 𝜑"). See also comments for df-eu 2599 and 2eu4 2684. In the case of decompositions of complex numbers as a sum of a complex number and a square of a complex number, the only/unique complex number to which the square of a unique complex number is added yields in the given complex number is the given number itself, and the unique complex number to be squared is 0 (see comment for addsq2reu 27558). There are, however, complex numbers to which the square of more than one other complex numbers can be added to yield the given complex number (see addsqrexnreu 27560). For example, ⟨1, (√‘(𝐶 − 1))⟩ and ⟨1, -(√‘(𝐶 − 1))⟩ are two different decompositions of 𝐶 (if 𝐶 ≠ 1). Therefore, there is no unique decomposition of any complex number as a sum of a complex number and a square of a complex number, as generally proved by this theorem. As a consequence, a theorem must claim the existence of a unique pair of sets to express "There are unique 𝑎 and 𝑏 so that .." (more formally ∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 with 𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩), or by showing (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑) (see 2reu4 4481 resp. 2eu4 2684). These two representations are equivalent (see opreu2reurex 6284). An analogon of this theorem using the latter variant is given in addsqn2reurex2 27563. In some cases, however, the variant with (ordered!) pairs may be possible only for ordered sets (like ℝ or ℙ) and claiming that the first component is less than or equal to the second component (see, for example, 2sqreunnltb 27579 and 2sqreuopb 27586). Alternatively, (proper) unordered pairs can be used: ∃!𝑝𝑒𝒫 𝐴((♯‘𝑝) = 2 ∧ 𝜑), or, using the definition of proper pairs: ∃!𝑝 ∈ (Pairsproper‘𝐴)𝜑 (see, for example, inlinecirc02preu 49420). (Contributed by AV, 21-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℂ × ℂ)((1st ‘𝑝) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	addsq2nreurex 27562*	For each complex number 𝐶, there is no unique complex number 𝑎 added to the square of another complex number 𝑏 resulting in the given complex number 𝐶. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	addsqn2reurex2 27563*	For each complex number 𝐶, there does not uniquely exist two complex numbers 𝑎 and 𝑏, with 𝑏 squared and added to 𝑎 resulting in the given complex number 𝐶. Remark: This, together with addsq2reu 27558, is an example showing that the pattern ∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 does not necessarily mean "There are unique sets 𝑎 and 𝑏 fulfilling 𝜑), as it is the case with the pattern (∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴𝜑. See also comments for df-eu 2599 and 2eu4 2684. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶))
Theorem	2sqreulem1 27564*	Lemma 1 for 2sqreu 27574. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreultlem 27565*	Lemma for 2sqreult 27576. (Contributed by AV, 8-Jun-2023.) (Proposed by GL, 8-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreultblem 27566*	Lemma for 2sqreultb 27577. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jun-2023.) The prime needs not be odd, as observed by WL. (Revised by AV, 18-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)))
Theorem	2sqreunnlem1 27567*	Lemma 1 for 2sqreunn 27575. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreunnltlem 27568*	Lemma for 2sqreunnlt 27578. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2023.) Specialization to different integers, proposed by GL. (Revised by AV, 11-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreunnltblem 27569*	Lemma for 2sqreunnltb 27579. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2023.) The prime needs not be odd, as observed by WL. (Revised by AV, 18-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)))
Theorem	2sqreulem2 27570	Lemma 2 for 2sqreu 27574 etc. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐶↑2)) → 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	2sqreulem3 27571	Lemma 3 for 2sqreu 27574 etc. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0)) → (((𝜑 ∧ ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 𝑃) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐶↑2)) = 𝑃)) → 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	2sqreulem4 27572*	Lemma 4 for 2sqreu 27574 et. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃*𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑
Theorem	2sqreunnlem2 27573*	Lemma 2 for 2sqreunn 27575. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃*𝑏 ∈ ℕ 𝜑
Theorem	2sqreu 27574*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two nonnegative integers. See 2sqnn0 27556 for the existence of such a decomposition. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2023.) (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑))
Theorem	2sqreunn 27575*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two positive integers. See 2sqnn 27557 for the existence of such a decomposition. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2023.) (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ 𝜑))
Theorem	2sqreult 27576*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different nonnegative integers. (Contributed by AV, 8-Jun-2023.) (Proposed by GL, 8-Jun-2023.) (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑))
Theorem	2sqreultb 27577*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different nonnegative integers iff 𝑃≡1 (mod 4). (Contributed by AV, 10-Jun-2023.) The prime needs not be odd, as observed by WL. (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑)))
Theorem	2sqreunnlt 27578*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two different positive integers. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2023.) Specialization to different integers, proposed by GL. (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ 𝜑))
Theorem	2sqreunnltb 27579*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different positive integers iff the prime is of the form 4𝑘 + 1. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2023.) The prime needs not be odd, as observed by WL. (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ 𝜑)))
Theorem	2sqreuop 27580*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two nonnegative integers. Ordered pair variant of 2sqreu 27574. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ0 × ℕ0)((1st ‘𝑝) ≤ (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreuopnn 27581*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two positive integers. Ordered pair variant of 2sqreunn 27575. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ × ℕ)((1st ‘𝑝) ≤ (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreuoplt 27582*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different nonnegative integers. Ordered pair variant of 2sqreult 27576. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ0 × ℕ0)((1st ‘𝑝) < (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreuopltb 27583*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different nonnegative integers iff 𝑃≡1 (mod 4). Ordered pair variant of 2sqreultb 27577. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ0 × ℕ0)((1st ‘𝑝) < (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃)))
Theorem	2sqreuopnnlt 27584*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two different positive integers. Ordered pair variant of 2sqreunnlt 27578. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ × ℕ)((1st ‘𝑝) < (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreuopnnltb 27585*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different positive integers iff the prime is of the form 4𝑘 + 1. Ordered pair variant of 2sqreunnltb 27579. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ × ℕ)((1st ‘𝑝) < (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃)))
Theorem	2sqreuopb 27586*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different positive integers iff the prime is of the form 4𝑘 + 1. Alternate ordered pair variant of 2sqreunnltb 27579. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ × ℕ)∃𝑎∃𝑏(𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∧ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))))
14.4.12  Chebyshev's Weak Prime Number Theorem, Dirichlet's Theorem
Theorem	chebbnd1lem1 27587	Lemma for chebbnd1 27590: show a lower bound on π(𝑥) at even integers using similar techniques to those used to prove bpos 27411. (Note that the expression 𝐾 is actually equal to 2 · 𝑁, but proving that is not necessary for the proof, and it's too much work.) The key to the proof is bposlem1 27402, which shows that each term in the expansion ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁) = ∏𝑝 ∈ ℙ (𝑝↑(𝑝 pCnt ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁))) is at most 2 · 𝑁, so that the sum really only has nonzero elements up to 2 · 𝑁, and since each term is at most 2 · 𝑁, after taking logs we get the inequality π(2 · 𝑁) · log(2 · 𝑁) ≤ log((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁), and bclbnd 27398 finishes the proof. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Apr-2016.)
⊢ 𝐾 = if((2 · 𝑁) ≤ ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁), (2 · 𝑁), ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘4) → (log‘((4↑𝑁) / 𝑁)) < ((π‘(2 · 𝑁)) · (log‘(2 · 𝑁))))
Theorem	chebbnd1lem2 27588	Lemma for chebbnd1 27590: Show that log(𝑁) / 𝑁 does not change too much between 𝑁 and 𝑀 = ⌊(𝑁 / 2). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (⌊‘(𝑁 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℝ ∧ 8 ≤ 𝑁) → ((log‘(2 · 𝑀)) / (2 · 𝑀)) < (2 · ((log‘𝑁) / 𝑁)))
Theorem	chebbnd1lem3 27589	Lemma for chebbnd1 27590: get a lower bound on π(𝑁) / (𝑁 / log(𝑁)) that is independent of 𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (⌊‘(𝑁 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℝ ∧ 8 ≤ 𝑁) → (((log‘2) − (1 / (2 · e))) / 2) < ((π‘𝑁) · ((log‘𝑁) / 𝑁)))
Theorem	chebbnd1 27590	The Chebyshev bound: The function π(𝑥) is eventually lower bounded by a positive constant times 𝑥 / log(𝑥). Alternatively stated, the function (𝑥 / log(𝑥)) / π(𝑥) is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞) ↦ ((𝑥 / (log‘𝑥)) / (π‘𝑥))) ∈ 𝑂(1)
Theorem	chtppilimlem1 27591	Lemma for chtppilim 27593. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (2[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁↑𝑐𝐴) / (π‘𝑁)) < (1 − 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) · ((π‘𝑁) · (log‘𝑁))) < (θ‘𝑁))
Theorem	chtppilimlem2 27592*	Lemma for chtppilim 27593. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞)(𝑧 ≤ 𝑥 → ((𝐴↑2) · ((π‘𝑥) · (log‘𝑥))) < (θ‘𝑥)))
Theorem	chtppilim 27593	The θ function is asymptotic to π(𝑥)log(𝑥), so it is sufficient to prove θ(𝑥) / 𝑥 ⇝𝑟 1 to establish the PNT. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞) ↦ ((θ‘𝑥) / ((π‘𝑥) · (log‘𝑥)))) ⇝𝑟 1
Theorem	chto1ub 27594	The θ function is upper bounded by a linear term. Corollary of chtub 27330. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ ((θ‘𝑥) / 𝑥)) ∈ 𝑂(1)
Theorem	chebbnd2 27595	The Chebyshev bound, part 2: The function π(𝑥) is eventually upper bounded by a positive constant times 𝑥 / log(𝑥). Alternatively stated, the function π(𝑥) / (𝑥 / log(𝑥)) is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞) ↦ ((π‘𝑥) / (𝑥 / (log‘𝑥)))) ∈ 𝑂(1)
Theorem	chto1lb 27596	The θ function is lower bounded by a linear term. Corollary of chebbnd1 27590. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞) ↦ (𝑥 / (θ‘𝑥))) ∈ 𝑂(1)
Theorem	chpchtlim 27597	The ψ and θ functions are asymptotic to each other, so is sufficient to prove either θ(𝑥) / 𝑥 ⇝𝑟 1 or ψ(𝑥) / 𝑥 ⇝𝑟 1 to establish the PNT. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞) ↦ ((ψ‘𝑥) / (θ‘𝑥))) ⇝𝑟 1
Theorem	chpo1ub 27598	The ψ function is upper bounded by a linear term. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ ((ψ‘𝑥) / 𝑥)) ∈ 𝑂(1)
Theorem	chpo1ubb 27599*	The ψ function is upper bounded by a linear term. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2016.)
⊢ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ (ψ‘𝑥) ≤ (𝑐 · 𝑥)
Theorem	vmadivsum 27600*	The sum of the von Mangoldt function over 𝑛 is asymptotic to log𝑥 + 𝑂(1). Equation 9.2.13 of [Shapiro], p. 331. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛) − (log‘𝑥))) ∈ 𝑂(1)