P. 276 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 27501-27600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	clwwlknon1nloop 27501	If there is no loop at vertex 𝑋, the set of (closed) walks on 𝑋 of length 1 as words over the set of vertices is empty. (Contributed by AV, 11-Feb-2022.) (Revised by AV, 25-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝑋} ∉ 𝐸 → (𝑋𝐶1) = ∅)
Theorem	clwwlknon1sn 27502	The set of (closed) walks on vertex 𝑋 of length 1 as words over the set of vertices is a singleton containing the singleton word consisting of 𝑋 iff there is a loop at 𝑋. (Contributed by AV, 11-Feb-2022.) (Revised by AV, 25-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑋𝐶1) = {⟨“𝑋”⟩} ↔ {𝑋} ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	clwwlknon1le1 27503	There is at most one (closed) walk on vertex 𝑋 of length 1 as word over the set of vertices. (Contributed by AV, 11-Feb-2022.) (Revised by AV, 25-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (♯‘(𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)1)) ≤ 1
Theorem	clwwlknon2 27504*	The set of closed walks on vertex 𝑋 of length 2 in a graph 𝐺 as words over the set of vertices. (Contributed by AV, 5-Mar-2022.) (Proof revised by AV, 25-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋𝐶2) = {𝑤 ∈ (2 ClWWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑋}
Theorem	clwwlknon2x 27505*	The set of closed walks on vertex 𝑋 of length 2 in a graph 𝐺 as words over the set of vertices, definition of ClWWalksN expanded. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 25-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋𝐶2) = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ ((♯‘𝑤) = 2 ∧ {(𝑤‘0), (𝑤‘1)} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑋)}
Theorem	s2elclwwlknon2 27506	Sufficient conditions of a doubleton word to represent a closed walk on vertex 𝑋 of length 2. (Contributed by AV, 11-May-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ 𝐸) → ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩ ∈ (𝑋𝐶2))
Theorem	clwwlknon2num 27507	In a 𝐾-regular graph 𝐺, there are 𝐾 closed walks on vertex 𝑋 of length 2. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 25-Feb-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 25-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐺RegUSGraph𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺)) → (♯‘(𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)2)) = 𝐾)
Theorem	clwwlknonwwlknonb 27508	A word over vertices represents a closed walk of a fixed length 𝑁 on vertex 𝑋 iff the word concatenated with 𝑋 represents a walk of length 𝑁 on 𝑋 and 𝑋. This theorem would not hold for 𝑁 = 0 and 𝑊 = ∅, see clwwlknwwlksnb 27452. (Contributed by AV, 4-Mar-2022.) (Revised by AV, 27-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑊 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) ↔ (𝑊 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩) ∈ (𝑋(𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝑋)))
Theorem	clwwlknonex2lem1 27509	Lemma 1 for clwwlknonex2 27511: Transformation of a special half-open integer range into a union of a smaller half-open integer range and an unordered pair. This Lemma would not hold for 𝑁 = 2, i.e., (♯‘𝑊) = 0, because (0..^(((♯‘𝑊) + 2) − 1)) = (0..^((0 + 2) − 1)) = (0..^1) = {0} ≠ {-1, 0} = (∅ ∪ {-1, 0}) = ((0..^(0 − 1)) ∪ {(0 − 1), 0}) = ((0..^((♯‘𝑊) − 1)) ∪ {((♯‘𝑊) − 1), (♯‘𝑊)}). (Contributed by AV, 22-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 26-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ (♯‘𝑊) = (𝑁 − 2)) → (0..^(((♯‘𝑊) + 2) − 1)) = ((0..^((♯‘𝑊) − 1)) ∪ {((♯‘𝑊) − 1), (♯‘𝑊)}))
Theorem	clwwlknonex2lem2 27510*	Lemma 2 for clwwlknonex2 27511: Transformation of a walk and two edges into a walk extended by two vertices/edges. (Contributed by AV, 22-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 27-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) ∧ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑊) − 1)){(𝑊‘𝑖), (𝑊‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {(lastS‘𝑊), (𝑊‘0)} ∈ 𝐸) ∧ (♯‘𝑊) = (𝑁 − 2) ∧ (𝑊‘0) = 𝑋)) ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ 𝐸) → ∀𝑖 ∈ ((0..^((♯‘𝑊) − 1)) ∪ {((♯‘𝑊) − 1), (♯‘𝑊)}){(((𝑊 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩) ++ ⟨“𝑌”⟩)‘𝑖), (((𝑊 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩) ++ ⟨“𝑌”⟩)‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ 𝐸)
Theorem	clwwlknonex2 27511	Extending a closed walk 𝑊 on vertex 𝑋 by an additional edge (forth and back) results in a closed walk. (Contributed by AV, 22-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 25-Feb-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)(𝑁 − 2))) → ((𝑊 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩) ++ ⟨“𝑌”⟩) ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺))
Theorem	clwwlknonex2e 27512	Extending a closed walk 𝑊 on vertex 𝑋 by an additional edge (forth and back) results in a closed walk on vertex 𝑋. (Contributed by AV, 17-Apr-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)(𝑁 − 2))) → ((𝑊 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩) ++ ⟨“𝑌”⟩) ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁))
Theorem	clwwlknondisj 27513*	The sets of closed walks on different vertices are disjunct. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Oct-2018.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 3-Mar-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Mar-2022.)
⊢ Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁)
Theorem	clwwlknun 27514*	The set of closed walks of fixed length 𝑁 in a simple graph 𝐺 is the union of the closed walks of the fixed length 𝑁 on each of the vertices of graph 𝐺. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Oct-2018.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 3-Mar-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USGraph → (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁))
Theorem	clwwlkvbij 27515*	There is a bijection between the set of closed walks of a fixed length 𝑁 on a fixed vertex 𝑋 represented by walks (as word) and the set of closed walks (as words) of the fixed length 𝑁 on the fixed vertex 𝑋. The difference between these two representations is that in the first case the fixed vertex is repeated at the end of the word, and in the second case it is not. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 26-Apr-2021.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Nov-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((lastS‘𝑤) = (𝑤‘0) ∧ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑋)}–1-1-onto→(𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁))
Theorem	clwwlkvbijOLD 27516*	Obsolete proof of clwwlkvbij 27515 as of 12-Oct-2022. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 26-Apr-2021.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((lastS‘𝑤) = (𝑤‘0) ∧ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑋)}–1-1-onto→(𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁))
16.3.11  Examples for walks, trails and paths
Theorem	0ewlk 27517	The empty set (empty sequence of edges) is an s-walk of edges for all s. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ0*) → ∅ ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆))
Theorem	1ewlk 27518	A sequence of 1 edge is an s-walk of edges for all s. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ0* ∧ 𝐼 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺)) → ⟨“𝐼”⟩ ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆))
Theorem	0wlk 27519	A pair of an empty set (of edges) and a second set (of vertices) is a walk iff the second set contains exactly one vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑈 → (∅(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝑃:(0...0)⟶𝑉))
Theorem	is0wlk 27520	A pair of an empty set (of edges) and a sequence of one vertex is a walk (of length 0). (Contributed by AV, 3-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 = {⟨0, 𝑁⟩} ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → ∅(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	0wlkonlem1 27521	Lemma 1 for 0wlkon 27523 and 0trlon 27527. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃:(0...0)⟶𝑉 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = 𝑁) → (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉))
Theorem	0wlkonlem2 27522	Lemma 2 for 0wlkon 27523 and 0trlon 27527. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃:(0...0)⟶𝑉 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = 𝑁) → 𝑃 ∈ (𝑉 ↑pm (0...0)))
Theorem	0wlkon 27523	A walk of length 0 from a vertex to itself. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃:(0...0)⟶𝑉 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = 𝑁) → ∅(𝑁(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝑁)𝑃)
Theorem	0wlkons1 27524	A walk of length 0 from a vertex to itself. (Contributed by AV, 17-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅(𝑁(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝑁)⟨“𝑁”⟩)
Theorem	0trl 27525	A pair of an empty set (of edges) and a second set (of vertices) is a trail iff the second set contains exactly one vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑈 → (∅(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝑃:(0...0)⟶𝑉))
Theorem	is0trl 27526	A pair of an empty set (of edges) and a sequence of one vertex is a trail (of length 0). (Contributed by AV, 7-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 = {⟨0, 𝑁⟩} ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → ∅(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	0trlon 27527	A trail of length 0 from a vertex to itself. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 8-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃:(0...0)⟶𝑉 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = 𝑁) → ∅(𝑁(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝑁)𝑃)
Theorem	0pth 27528	A pair of an empty set (of edges) and a second set (of vertices) is a path iff the second set contains exactly one vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 19-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (∅(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝑃:(0...0)⟶𝑉))
Theorem	0spth 27529	A pair of an empty set (of edges) and a second set (of vertices) is a simple path iff the second set contains exactly one vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 18-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (∅(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝑃:(0...0)⟶𝑉))
Theorem	0pthon 27530	A path of length 0 from a vertex to itself. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 20-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃:(0...0)⟶𝑉 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = 𝑁) → ∅(𝑁(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝑁)𝑃)
Theorem	0pthon1 27531	A path of length 0 from a vertex to itself. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 20-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅(𝑁(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝑁){⟨0, 𝑁⟩})
Theorem	0pthonv 27532*	For each vertex there is a path of length 0 from the vertex to itself. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 21-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝑁(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝑁)𝑝)
Theorem	0clwlk 27533	A pair of an empty set (of edges) and a second set (of vertices) is a closed walk if and only if the second set contains exactly one vertex (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 → (∅(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝑃:(0...0)⟶𝑉))
Theorem	0clwlkv 27534	Any vertex (more precisely, a pair of an empty set (of edges) and a singleton function to this vertex) determines a closed walk of length 0. (Contributed by AV, 11-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 = ∅ ∧ 𝑃:{0}⟶{𝑋}) → 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	0clwlk0 27535	There is no closed walk in the empty set (i.e. the null graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 5-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (ClWalks‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	0crct 27536	A pair of an empty set (of edges) and a second set (of vertices) is a circuit if and only if the second set contains exactly one vertex (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (∅(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝑃:(0...0)⟶(Vtx‘𝐺)))
Theorem	0cycl 27537	A pair of an empty set (of edges) and a second set (of vertices) is a cycle if and only if the second set contains exactly one vertex (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (∅(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝑃:(0...0)⟶(Vtx‘𝐺)))
Theorem	1pthdlem1 27538	Lemma 1 for 1pthd 27546. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    ⇒   ⊢ Fun ◡(𝑃 ↾ (1..^(♯‘𝐹)))
Theorem	1pthdlem2 27539	Lemma 2 for 1pthd 27546. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 “ {0, (♯‘𝐹)}) ∩ (𝑃 “ (1..^(♯‘𝐹)))) = ∅
Theorem	1wlkdlem1 27540	Lemma 1 for 1wlkd 27544. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉)
Theorem	1wlkdlem2 27541	Lemma 2 for 1wlkd 27544. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝑋})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐼‘𝐽))
Theorem	1wlkdlem3 27542	Lemma 3 for 1wlkd 27544. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝑋})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼)
Theorem	1wlkdlem4 27543*	Lemma 4 for 1wlkd 27544. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝑋})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))
Theorem	1wlkd 27544	In a graph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a walk. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop). (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝑋})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	1trld 27545	In a graph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a trail. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝑋})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	1pthd 27546	In a graph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a path. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop) - in this case, however, the path is not a simple path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝑋})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	1pthond 27547	In a graph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a path from one of these vertices to the other vertex. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop) - in this case, however, the path is not a simple path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝑋})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑋(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝑌)𝑃)
Theorem	upgr1wlkdlem1 27548	Lemma 1 for upgr1wlkd 27550. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋})
Theorem	upgr1wlkdlem2 27549	Lemma 2 for upgr1wlkd 27550. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽))
Theorem	upgr1wlkd 27550	In a pseudograph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a walk. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop). (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	upgr1trld 27551	In a pseudograph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a trail. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop). (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	upgr1pthd 27552	In a pseudograph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a path. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop) - in this case, however, the path is not a simple path. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	upgr1pthond 27553	In a pseudograph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a path from one of these vertices to the other vertex. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop) - in this case, however, the path is not a simple path. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑋(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝑌)𝑃)
Theorem	lppthon 27554	A loop (which is an edge at index 𝐽) induces a path of length 1 from a vertex to itself in a hypergraph. (Contributed by AV, 1-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐽 ∈ dom 𝐼 ∧ (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝐴}) → ⟨“𝐽”⟩(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐴)⟨“𝐴𝐴”⟩)
Theorem	lp1cycl 27555	A loop (which is an edge at index 𝐽) induces a cycle of length 1 in a hypergraph. (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐽 ∈ dom 𝐼 ∧ (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝐴}) → ⟨“𝐽”⟩(Cycles‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐴”⟩)
Theorem	1pthon2v 27556*	For each pair of adjacent vertices there is a path of length 1 from one vertex to the other in a hypergraph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 {𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ 𝑒) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑝)
Theorem	1pthon2ve 27557*	For each pair of adjacent vertices there is a path of length 1 from one vertex to the other in a hypergraph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑝)
Theorem	wlk2v2elem1 27558	Lemma 1 for wlk2v2e 27560: 𝐹 is a length 2 word of over {0}, the domain of the singleton word 𝐼. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ⟨“{𝑋, 𝑌}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“00”⟩    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼
Theorem	wlk2v2elem2 27559*	Lemma 2 for wlk2v2e 27560: The values of 𝐼 after 𝐹 are edges between two vertices enumerated by 𝑃. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ⟨“{𝑋, 𝑌}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“00”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑋”⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}
Theorem	wlk2v2e 27560	In a graph with two vertices and one edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other and back to the first vertex via the same/only edge is a walk. Notice that 𝐺 is a simple graph (without loops) only if 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 8-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ⟨“{𝑋, 𝑌}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“00”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑋”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨{𝑋, 𝑌}, 𝐼⟩    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃
Theorem	ntrl2v2e 27561	A walk which is not a trail: In a graph with two vertices and one edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other and back to the first vertex via the same/only edge is a walk, see wlk2v2e 27560, but not a trail. Notice that 𝐺 is a simple graph (without loops) only if 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 8-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ⟨“{𝑋, 𝑌}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“00”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑋”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨{𝑋, 𝑌}, 𝐼⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃
Theorem	3wlkdlem1 27562	Lemma 1 for 3wlkd 27573. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (♯‘𝑃) = ((♯‘𝐹) + 1)
Theorem	3wlkdlem2 27563	Lemma 2 for 3wlkd 27573. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)) = {0, 1, 2}
Theorem	3wlkdlem3 27564	Lemma 3 for 3wlkd 27573. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑃‘0) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑃‘1) = 𝐵) ∧ ((𝑃‘2) = 𝐶 ∧ (𝑃‘3) = 𝐷)))
Theorem	3wlkdlem4 27565*	Lemma 4 for 3wlkd 27573. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑉)
Theorem	3wlkdlem5 27566*	Lemma 5 for 3wlkd 27573. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)))
Theorem	3pthdlem1 27567*	Lemma 1 for 3pthd 27577. (Contributed by AV, 9-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑃))∀𝑗 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝑘 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑃‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑃‘𝑗)))
Theorem	3wlkdlem6 27568	Lemma 6 for 3wlkd 27573. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐼‘𝐿)))
Theorem	3wlkdlem7 27569	Lemma 7 for 3wlkd 27573. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ V ∧ 𝐾 ∈ V ∧ 𝐿 ∈ V))
Theorem	3wlkdlem8 27570	Lemma 8 for 3wlkd 27573. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘0) = 𝐽 ∧ (𝐹‘1) = 𝐾 ∧ (𝐹‘2) = 𝐿))
Theorem	3wlkdlem9 27571	Lemma 9 for 3wlkd 27573. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘2))))
Theorem	3wlkdlem10 27572*	Lemma 10 for 3wlkd 27573. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)){(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))
Theorem	3wlkd 27573	Construction of a walk from two given edges in a graph. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	3wlkond 27574	A walk of length 3 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by AV, 8-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐷)𝑃)
Theorem	3trld 27575	Construction of a trail from two given edges in a graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 8-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	3trlond 27576	A trail of length 3 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by AV, 8-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐷)𝑃)
Theorem	3pthd 27577	A path of length 3 from one vertex to another vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	3pthond 27578	A path of length 3 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐷)𝑃)
Theorem	3spthd 27579	A simple path of length 3 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	3spthond 27580	A simple path of length 3 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐷)𝑃)
Theorem	3cycld 27581	Construction of a 3-cycle from three given edges in a graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	3cyclpd 27582	Construction of a 3-cycle from three given edges in a graph, containing an endpoint of one of these edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 3 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = 𝐴))
Theorem	upgr3v3e3cycl 27583*	If there is a cycle of length 3 in a pseudograph, there are three distinct vertices in the graph which are mutually connected by edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Nov-2017.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 3) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 (({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝑐} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑐, 𝑎} ∈ 𝐸) ∧ (𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑏 ≠ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ≠ 𝑎)))
Theorem	uhgr3cyclexlem 27584	Lemma for uhgr3cyclex 27585. (Contributed by AV, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐽 ∈ dom 𝐼 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} = (𝐼‘𝐽)) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ dom 𝐼 ∧ {𝐶, 𝐴} = (𝐼‘𝐾)))) → 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾)
Theorem	uhgr3cyclex 27585*	If there are three different vertices in a hypergraph which are mutually connected by edges, there is a 3-cycle in the graph containing one of these vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) ∧ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐶, 𝐴} ∈ 𝐸)) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 3 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = 𝐴))
Theorem	umgr3cyclex 27586*	If there are three (different) vertices in a multigraph which are mutually connected by edges, there is a 3-cycle in the graph containing one of these vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐶, 𝐴} ∈ 𝐸)) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 3 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = 𝐴))
Theorem	umgr3v3e3cycl 27587*	If and only if there is a 3-cycle in a multigraph, there are three (different) vertices in the graph which are mutually connected by edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 14-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UMGraph → (∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 3) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝑐} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑐, 𝑎} ∈ 𝐸)))
Theorem	upgr4cycl4dv4e 27588*	If there is a cycle of length 4 in a pseudograph, there are four (different) vertices in the graph which are mutually connected by edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 13-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 4) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑉 ((({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝑐} ∈ 𝐸) ∧ ({𝑐, 𝑑} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑑, 𝑎} ∈ 𝐸)) ∧ ((𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ 𝑑) ∧ (𝑏 ≠ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑏 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ 𝑐 ≠ 𝑑))))
16.3.12  Connected graphs
Syntax	cconngr 27589	Extend class notation with connected graphs.
class ConnGraph
Definition	df-conngr 27590*	Define the class of all connected graphs. A graph is called connected if there is a path between every pair of (distinct) vertices. The distinctness of the vertices is not necessary for the definition, because there is always a path (of length 0) from a vertex to itself, see 0pthonv 27532 and dfconngr1 27591. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ConnGraph = {𝑔 ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣]∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑣 ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑣 ∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝑘(PathsOn‘𝑔)𝑛)𝑝}
Theorem	dfconngr1 27591*	Alternative definition of the class of all connected graphs, requiring paths between distinct vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ConnGraph = {𝑔 ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣]∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑣 ∀𝑛 ∈ (𝑣 ∖ {𝑘})∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝑘(PathsOn‘𝑔)𝑛)𝑝}
Theorem	isconngr 27592*	The property of being a connected graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝑘(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝑛)𝑝))
Theorem	isconngr1 27593*	The property of being a connected graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑛 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑘})∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝑘(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝑛)𝑝))
Theorem	cusconngr 27594	A complete hypergraph is connected. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ ComplGraph) → 𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph)
Theorem	0conngr 27595	A graph without vertices is connected. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ ConnGraph
Theorem	0vconngr 27596	A graph without vertices is connected. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ (Vtx‘𝐺) = ∅) → 𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph)
Theorem	1conngr 27597	A graph with (at most) one vertex is connected. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ (Vtx‘𝐺) = {𝑁}) → 𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph)
Theorem	conngrv2edg 27598*	A vertex in a connected graph with more than one vertex is incident with at least one edge. Formerly part of proof for vdgn0frgrv2 27703. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 4-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 1 < (♯‘𝑉)) → ∃𝑒 ∈ ran 𝐼 𝑁 ∈ 𝑒)
Theorem	vdn0conngrumgrv2 27599	A vertex in a connected multigraph with more than one vertex cannot have degree 0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 4-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ UMGraph) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 1 < (♯‘𝑉))) → ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑁) ≠ 0)
16.4  Eulerian paths and the Konigsberg Bridge problem
16.4.1  Eulerian paths According to Wikipedia ("Eulerian path", 9-Mar-2021, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eulerian_path): "In graph theory, an Eulerian trail (or Eulerian path) is a trail in a finite graph that visits every edge exactly once (allowing for revisiting vertices). Similarly, an Eulerian circuit or Eulerian cycle is an Eulerian trail that starts and ends on the same vertex. ... The term Eulerian graph has two common meanings in graph theory. One meaning is a graph with an Eulerian circuit, and the other is a graph with every vertex of even degree. These definitions coincide for connected graphs. ... A graph that has an Eulerian trail but not an Eulerian circuit is called semi-Eulerian." Correspondingly, an Eulerian path is defined as "a trail containing all edges" (see definition in [Bollobas] p. 16) in df-eupth 27601 resp. iseupth 27604. (EulerPaths‘𝐺) is the set of all Eulerian paths in graph 𝐺, see eupths 27603. An Eulerian circuit (called Euler tour in the definition in [Diestel] p. 22) is "a circuit in a graph containing all the edges" (see definition in [Bollobas] p. 16), or, with other words, a circuit which is an Eulerian path. The function mapping a graph to the set of its Eulerian paths is defined as EulerPaths in df-eupth 27601, whereas there is no explicit definition for Eulerian circuits (yet): The statement "⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ is an Eulerian circuit" is formally expressed by (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃). Each Eulerian path can be made an Eulerian circuit by adding an edge which connects the endpoints of the Eulerian path (see eupth2eucrct 27621). Vice versa, removing one edge from a graph with an Eulerian circuit results in a graph with an Eulerian path, see eucrct2eupth 27651. An Eulerian path does not have to be a path in the meaning of definition df-pths 27068, because it may traverse some vertices more than once. Therefore, "Eulerian trail" would be a more appropriate name. The main result of this section is (one direction of) Euler's Theorem: "A non-trivial connected graph has an Euler[ian] circuit iff each vertex has even degree." (see part 1 of theorem 12 in [Bollobas] p. 16 and theorem 1.8.1 in [Diestel] p. 22) or, expressed with Eulerian paths: "A connected graph has an Euler[ian] trail from a vertex x to a vertex y (not equal with x) iff x and y are the only vertices of odd degree." (see part 2 of theorem 12 in [Bollobas] p. 17). In eulerpath 27645, it is shown that a pseudograph with an Eulerian path has either zero or two vertices of odd degree, and eulercrct 27646 shows that a pseudograph with an Eulerian circuit has only vertices of even degree.
Syntax	ceupth 27600	Extend class notation with Eulerian paths.
class EulerPaths