P. 276 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 27501-27600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	negs0s 27501	Negative surreal zero is surreal zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ( -us ‘ 0s ) = 0s
Theorem	negsproplem1 27502*	Lemma for surreal negation. We prove a pair of properties of surreal negation simultaneously. First, we instantiate some quantifiers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( bday ‘𝑋) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝑋) ∈ No ∧ (𝑋 <s 𝑌 → ( -us ‘𝑌) <s ( -us ‘𝑋))))
Theorem	negsproplem2 27503*	Lemma for surreal negation. Show that the cut that defines negation is legitimate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	negsproplem3 27504*	Lemma for surreal negation. Give the cut properties of surreal negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
Theorem	negsproplem4 27505*	Lemma for surreal negation. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis when 𝐴 is simpler than 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))
Theorem	negsproplem5 27506*	Lemma for surreal negation. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis when 𝐵 is simpler than 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))
Theorem	negsproplem6 27507*	Lemma for surreal negation. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis when 𝐴 is the same age as 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))
Theorem	negsproplem7 27508*	Lemma for surreal negation. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis unconditionally. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))
Theorem	negsprop 27509	Show closure and ordering properties of negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ (𝐴 <s 𝐵 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))))
Theorem	negscl 27510	The surreals are closed under negation. Theorem 6(ii) of [Conway] p. 18. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No )
Theorem	negscld 27511	The surreals are closed under negation. Theorem 6(ii) of [Conway] p. 18. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No )
Theorem	sltnegim 27512	The forward direction of the ordering properties of negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	negscut 27513	The cut properties of surreal negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
Theorem	negscut2 27514	The cut that defines surreal negation is legitimate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	negsid 27515	Surreal addition of a number and its negative. Theorem 4(iii) of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 +s ( -us ‘𝐴)) = 0s )
Theorem	negsidd 27516	Surreal addition of a number and its negative. Theorem 4(iii) of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +s ( -us ‘𝐴)) = 0s )
Theorem	negsex 27517*	Every surreal has a negative. Note that this theorem, addscl 27465, addscom 27450, addsass 27488, addsrid 27448, and sltadd1im 27468 are the ordered Abelian group axioms. However, the surreals cannot be said to be an ordered Abelian group because No is a proper class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ∃𝑥 ∈ No (𝐴 +s 𝑥) = 0s )
Theorem	negnegs 27518	A surreal is equal to the negative of its negative. Theorem 4(ii) of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( -us ‘( -us ‘𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	sltneg 27519	Negative of both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	sleneg 27520	Negative of both sides of surreal less-than or equal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 ≤s 𝐵 ↔ ( -us ‘𝐵) ≤s ( -us ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	sltnegd 27521	Negative of both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	slenegd 27522	Negative of both sides of surreal less-than or equal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤s 𝐵 ↔ ( -us ‘𝐵) ≤s ( -us ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	negs11 27523	Surreal negation is one-to-one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (( -us ‘𝐴) = ( -us ‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	negsdi 27524	Distribution of surreal negative over addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → ( -us ‘(𝐴 +s 𝐵)) = (( -us ‘𝐴) +s ( -us ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	slt0neg2d 27525	Comparison of a surreal and its negative to zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0s <s 𝐴 ↔ ( -us ‘𝐴) <s 0s ))
Theorem	negsf 27526	Function statement for surreal negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ -us : No ⟶ No
Theorem	negsfo 27527	Function statement for surreal negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ -us : No –onto→ No
Theorem	negsf1o 27528	Surreal negation is a bijection. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ -us : No –1-1-onto→ No
Theorem	negsunif 27529	Uniformity property for surreal negation. If 𝐿 and 𝑅 are any cut that represents 𝐴, then they may be used instead of ( L ‘𝐴) and ( R ‘𝐴) in the definition of negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐿 |s 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐴) = (( -us “ 𝑅) |s ( -us “ 𝐿)))
Theorem	negsbdaylem 27530	Lemma for negsbday 27531. Bound the birthday of the negative of a surreal number above. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( bday ‘( -us ‘𝐴)) ⊆ ( bday ‘𝐴))
Theorem	negsbday 27531	Negation of a surreal number preserves birthday. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( bday ‘( -us ‘𝐴)) = ( bday ‘𝐴))
Theorem	subsval 27532	The value of surreal subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 -s 𝐵) = (𝐴 +s ( -us ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	subsvald 27533	The value of surreal subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 -s 𝐵) = (𝐴 +s ( -us ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	subscl 27534	Closure law for surreal subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 -s 𝐵) ∈ No )
Theorem	subscld 27535	Closure law for surreal subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 -s 𝐵) ∈ No )
Theorem	subsid1 27536	Identity law for subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 -s 0s ) = 𝐴)
Theorem	subsid 27537	Subtraction of a surreal from itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 -s 𝐴) = 0s )
Theorem	subadds 27538	Relationship between addition and subtraction for surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → ((𝐴 -s 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 +s 𝐶) = 𝐴))
Theorem	subaddsd 27539	Relationship between addition and subtraction for surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 +s 𝐶) = 𝐴))
Theorem	pncans 27540	Cancellation law for surreal subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) -s 𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	pncan3s 27541	Subtraction and addition of equals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 +s (𝐵 -s 𝐴)) = 𝐵)
Theorem	npcans 27542	Cancellation law for surreal subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → ((𝐴 -s 𝐵) +s 𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	sltsub1 27543	Subtraction from both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 -s 𝐶) <s (𝐵 -s 𝐶)))
Theorem	sltsub2 27544	Subtraction from both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 -s 𝐵) <s (𝐶 -s 𝐴)))
Theorem	sltsub1d 27545	Subtraction from both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 -s 𝐶) <s (𝐵 -s 𝐶)))
Theorem	sltsub2d 27546	Subtraction from both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 -s 𝐵) <s (𝐶 -s 𝐴)))
Theorem	negsubsdi2d 27547	Distribution of negative over subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘(𝐴 -s 𝐵)) = (𝐵 -s 𝐴))
Theorem	addsubsassd 27548	Associative-type law for surreal addition and subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) -s 𝐶) = (𝐴 +s (𝐵 -s 𝐶)))
Theorem	addsubsd 27549	Law for surreal addition and subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) -s 𝐶) = ((𝐴 -s 𝐶) +s 𝐵))
Theorem	sltsubsubbd 27550	Equivalence for the surreal less-than relationship between differences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐶) <s (𝐵 -s 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 -s 𝐵) <s (𝐶 -s 𝐷)))
Theorem	sltsubsub2bd 27551	Equivalence for the surreal less-than relationship between differences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐵) <s (𝐶 -s 𝐷) ↔ (𝐷 -s 𝐶) <s (𝐵 -s 𝐴)))
Theorem	sltsubsub3bd 27552	Equivalence for the surreal less-than relationship between differences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐶) <s (𝐵 -s 𝐷) ↔ (𝐷 -s 𝐶) <s (𝐵 -s 𝐴)))
Theorem	slesubsubbd 27553	Equivalence for the surreal less-than or equal relationship between differences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐶) ≤s (𝐵 -s 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 -s 𝐵) ≤s (𝐶 -s 𝐷)))
Theorem	slesubsub2bd 27554	Equivalence for the surreal less-than or equal relationship between differences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐵) ≤s (𝐶 -s 𝐷) ↔ (𝐷 -s 𝐶) ≤s (𝐵 -s 𝐴)))
Theorem	slesubsub3bd 27555	Equivalence for the surreal less-than or equal relationship between differences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐶) ≤s (𝐵 -s 𝐷) ↔ (𝐷 -s 𝐶) ≤s (𝐵 -s 𝐴)))
Theorem	sltsubaddd 27556	Surreal less-than relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐵) <s 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 <s (𝐶 +s 𝐵)))
Theorem	sltsubadd2d 27557	Surreal less-than relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐵) <s 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 <s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	sltaddsubd 27558	Surreal less-than relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) <s 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 <s (𝐶 -s 𝐵)))
Theorem	sltaddsub2d 27559	Surreal less-than relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) <s 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 <s (𝐶 -s 𝐴)))
Theorem	subsubs4d 27560	Law for double surreal subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐵) -s 𝐶) = (𝐴 -s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	posdifsd 27561	Comparison of two surreals whose difference is positive. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ 0s <s (𝐵 -s 𝐴)))
15.5.3  Multiplication
Syntax	cmuls 27562	Set up the syntax for surreal multiplication.
class ·s
Definition	df-muls 27563*	Define surreal multiplication. Definition from [Conway] p. 5. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ·s = norec2 ((𝑧 ∈ V, 𝑚 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦⦌(({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( L ‘𝑥)∃𝑞 ∈ ( L ‘𝑦)𝑎 = (((𝑝𝑚𝑦) +s (𝑥𝑚𝑞)) -s (𝑝𝑚𝑞))} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝑥)∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝑦)𝑏 = (((𝑟𝑚𝑦) +s (𝑥𝑚𝑠)) -s (𝑟𝑚𝑠))}) |s ({𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ( L ‘𝑥)∃𝑢 ∈ ( R ‘𝑦)𝑐 = (((𝑡𝑚𝑦) +s (𝑥𝑚𝑢)) -s (𝑡𝑚𝑢))} ∪ {𝑑 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ( R ‘𝑥)∃𝑤 ∈ ( L ‘𝑦)𝑑 = (((𝑣𝑚𝑦) +s (𝑥𝑚𝑤)) -s (𝑣𝑚𝑤))}))))
Theorem	mulsfn 27564	Surreal multiplication is a function over surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ·s Fn ( No × No )
Theorem	mulsval 27565*	The value of surreal multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) = (({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑞 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑎 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑏 = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) |s ({𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑢 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑐 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑑 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑤 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑑 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))})))
Theorem	mulsval2lem 27566*	Lemma for mulsval2 27567. Change bound variables in one of the cases. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Mar-2025.)
⊢ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑌 𝑎 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} = {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝑌 𝑏 = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}
Theorem	mulsval2 27567*	The value of surreal multiplication, expressed with fewer distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Mar-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) = (({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑞 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑎 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑏 = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) |s ({𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑢 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑐 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑑 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑤 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑑 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))})))
Theorem	muls01 27568	Surreal multiplication by zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 ·s 0s ) = 0s )
Theorem	mulsrid 27569	Surreal one is a right identity element for multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 ·s 1s ) = 𝐴)
Theorem	mulsridd 27570	Surreal one is a right identity element for multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 1s ) = 𝐴)
Theorem	mulsproplemcbv 27571*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Change some bound variables for later use. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑔 ∈ No ∀ℎ ∈ No ∀𝑖 ∈ No ∀𝑗 ∈ No ∀𝑘 ∈ No ∀𝑙 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑔) +no ( bday ‘ℎ)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑖) +no ( bday ‘𝑘)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑗) +no ( bday ‘𝑙))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑖) +no ( bday ‘𝑙)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑗) +no ( bday ‘𝑘))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑔 ·s ℎ) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑖 <s 𝑗 ∧ 𝑘 <s 𝑙) → ((𝑖 ·s 𝑙) -s (𝑖 ·s 𝑘)) <s ((𝑗 ·s 𝑙) -s (𝑗 ·s 𝑘))))))
Theorem	mulsproplem1 27572*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Instantiate some variables. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑍) +no ( bday ‘𝑇)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑊) +no ( bday ‘𝑈))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑍) +no ( bday ‘𝑈)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑊) +no ( bday ‘𝑇))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 ·s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑍 <s 𝑊 ∧ 𝑇 <s 𝑈) → ((𝑍 ·s 𝑈) -s (𝑍 ·s 𝑇)) <s ((𝑊 ·s 𝑈) -s (𝑊 ·s 𝑇)))))
Theorem	mulsproplem2 27573*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Under the inductive hypothesis, the product of a member of the old set of 𝐴 and 𝐵 itself is a surreal number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐴)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No )
Theorem	mulsproplem3 27574*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Under the inductive hypothesis, the product of 𝐴 itself and a member of the old set of 𝐵 is a surreal number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝑌) ∈ No )
Theorem	mulsproplem4 27575*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Under the inductive hypothesis, the product of a member of the old set of 𝐴 and a member of the old set of 𝐵 is a surreal number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐴)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ·s 𝑌) ∈ No )
Theorem	mulsproplem5 27576*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Show one of the inequalities involved in surreal multiplication's cuts. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑃 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑄)) -s (𝑃 ·s 𝑄)) <s (((𝑇 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑈)) -s (𝑇 ·s 𝑈)))
Theorem	mulsproplem6 27577*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Show one of the inequalities involved in surreal multiplication's cuts. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑃 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑄)) -s (𝑃 ·s 𝑄)) <s (((𝑉 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑊)) -s (𝑉 ·s 𝑊)))
Theorem	mulsproplem7 27578*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Show one of the inequalities involved in surreal multiplication's cuts. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑅 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑆)) -s (𝑅 ·s 𝑆)) <s (((𝑇 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑈)) -s (𝑇 ·s 𝑈)))
Theorem	mulsproplem8 27579*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Show one of the inequalities involved in surreal multiplication's cuts. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑅 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑆)) -s (𝑅 ·s 𝑆)) <s (((𝑉 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑊)) -s (𝑉 ·s 𝑊)))
Theorem	mulsproplem9 27580*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Show that the cut involved in surreal multiplication makes sense. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑞 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑔 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)ℎ = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) <<s ({𝑖 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑢 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑖 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑗 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑤 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑗 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))}))
Theorem	mulsproplem10 27581*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. State the cut properties of surreal multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑞 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑔 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)ℎ = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) <<s {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} <<s ({𝑖 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑢 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑖 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑗 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑤 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑗 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))})))
Theorem	mulsproplem11 27582*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Under the inductive hypothesis, demonstrate closure of surreal multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No )
Theorem	mulsproplem12 27583*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Demonstrate the second half of the inductive statement assuming 𝐶 and 𝐷 are not the same age and 𝐸 and 𝐹 are not the same age. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 <s 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 <s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( bday ‘𝐶) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐷) ∨ ( bday ‘𝐷) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐶)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( bday ‘𝐸) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐹) ∨ ( bday ‘𝐹) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐸)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ·s 𝐹) -s (𝐶 ·s 𝐸)) <s ((𝐷 ·s 𝐹) -s (𝐷 ·s 𝐸)))
Theorem	mulsproplem13 27584*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Remove the restriction on 𝐶 and 𝐷 from mulsproplem12 27583. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 <s 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 <s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( bday ‘𝐸) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐹) ∨ ( bday ‘𝐹) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐸)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ·s 𝐹) -s (𝐶 ·s 𝐸)) <s ((𝐷 ·s 𝐹) -s (𝐷 ·s 𝐸)))
Theorem	mulsproplem14 27585*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Finally, we remove the restriction on 𝐸 and 𝐹 from mulsproplem12 27583 and mulsproplem13 27584. This completes the induction on surreal multiplication. mulsprop 27586 brings all this together technically. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 <s 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 <s 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ·s 𝐹) -s (𝐶 ·s 𝐸)) <s ((𝐷 ·s 𝐹) -s (𝐷 ·s 𝐸)))
Theorem	mulsprop 27586	Surreals are closed under multiplication and obey a particular ordering law. Theorem 3.4 of [Gonshor] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ No ∧ 𝐷 ∈ No ) ∧ (𝐸 ∈ No ∧ 𝐹 ∈ No )) → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ ((𝐶 <s 𝐷 ∧ 𝐸 <s 𝐹) → ((𝐶 ·s 𝐹) -s (𝐶 ·s 𝐸)) <s ((𝐷 ·s 𝐹) -s (𝐷 ·s 𝐸)))))
Theorem	mulscutlem 27587*	Lemma for mulscut 27588. State the theorem with extra DV conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑞 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑎 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑏 = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) <<s {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} <<s ({𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑢 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑐 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑑 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑤 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑑 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))})))
Theorem	mulscut 27588*	Show the cut properties of surreal multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑞 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑎 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑏 = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) <<s {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} <<s ({𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑢 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑐 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑑 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑤 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑑 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))})))
Theorem	mulscut2 27589*	Show that the cut involved in surreal multiplication is actually a cut. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑞 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑎 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑏 = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) <<s ({𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑢 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑐 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑑 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑤 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑑 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))}))
Theorem	mulscl 27590	The surreals are closed under multiplication. Theorem 8(i) of [Conway] p. 19. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No )
Theorem	mulscld 27591	The surreals are closed under multiplication. Theorem 8(i) of [Conway] p. 19. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No )
Theorem	sltmul 27592	An ordering relationship for surreal multiplication. Compare theorem 8(iii) of [Conway] p. 19. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ No ∧ 𝐷 ∈ No )) → ((𝐴 <s 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 <s 𝐷) → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐷) -s (𝐴 ·s 𝐶)) <s ((𝐵 ·s 𝐷) -s (𝐵 ·s 𝐶))))
Theorem	sltmuld 27593	An ordering relationship for surreal multiplication. Compare theorem 8(iii) of [Conway] p. 19. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 <s 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐷) -s (𝐴 ·s 𝐶)) <s ((𝐵 ·s 𝐷) -s (𝐵 ·s 𝐶)))
Theorem	slemuld 27594	An ordering relationship for surreal multiplication. Compare theorem 8(iii) of [Conway] p. 19. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤s 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐷) -s (𝐴 ·s 𝐶)) ≤s ((𝐵 ·s 𝐷) -s (𝐵 ·s 𝐶)))
Theorem	mulscom 27595	Surreal multiplication commutes. Part of theorem 7 of [Conway] p. 19. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Mar-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) = (𝐵 ·s 𝐴))
Theorem	mulscomd 27596	Surreal multiplication commutes. Part of theorem 7 of [Conway] p. 19. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) = (𝐵 ·s 𝐴))
Theorem	muls02 27597	Surreal multiplication by zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( 0s ·s 𝐴) = 0s )
Theorem	mulslid 27598	Surreal one is a left identity element for multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( 1s ·s 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	mulslidd 27599	Surreal one is a left identity element for multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1s ·s 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	mulsgt0 27600	The product of two positive surreals is positive. Theorem 9 of [Conway] p. 20. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 0s <s 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 0s <s 𝐵)) → 0s <s (𝐴 ·s 𝐵))