Theorem fsneqrn 46145

Description: Equality condition for two functions defined on a singleton. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 3-Mar-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
fsneqrn.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
fsneqrn.b	⊢ 𝐵 = {𝐴}
fsneqrn.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐵)
fsneqrn.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fsneqrn	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐺))

Proof of Theorem fsneqrn

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fsneqrn.f	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐵)
2		dffn3 6710	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐵 ↔ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ran 𝐹)
3	1, 2	sylib 221	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ran 𝐹)
4		fsneqrn.a	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
5		snidg 4620	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴})
6	4, 5	syl 18	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴})
7		fsneqrn.b	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝐴}
8	7	a1i 11	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = {𝐴})
9	8	eqcomd 2766	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴} = 𝐵)
10	6, 9	eleqtrd 2862	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
11	3, 10	ffvelcdmd 7073	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹)
12	11	adantr 486	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹)
13		simpr 490	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺) → 𝐹 = 𝐺)
14	13	rneqd 5916	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺) → ran 𝐹 = ran 𝐺)
15	12, 14	eleqtrd 2862	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐺)
16	15	ex 418	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = 𝐺 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐺))
17		simpr 490	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐺) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐺)
18		fsneqrn.g	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)
19		dffn2 6699	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐺 Fn 𝐵 ↔ 𝐺:𝐵⟶V)
20	18, 19	sylib 221	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶V)
21	8	feq2d 6681	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺:𝐵⟶V ↔ 𝐺:{𝐴}⟶V))
22	20, 21	mpbid 235	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:{𝐴}⟶V)
23	4, 22	rnsnf 46120	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐺 = {(𝐺‘𝐴)})
24	23	adantr 486	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐺) → ran 𝐺 = {(𝐺‘𝐴)})
25	17, 24	eleqtrd 2862	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐺) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ {(𝐺‘𝐴)})
26		elsni 4600	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ {(𝐺‘𝐴)} → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴))
27	25, 26	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐺) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴))
28	4	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐺) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
29	1	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐺) → 𝐹 Fn 𝐵)
30	18	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐺) → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)
31	28, 7, 29, 30	fsneq 7022	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐺) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴)))
32	27, 31	mpbird 260	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐺) → 𝐹 = 𝐺)
33	32	ex 418	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐺 → 𝐹 = 𝐺))
34	16, 33	impbid 215	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐺))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  Vcvv 3450  {csn 4583  ran crn 5648   Fn wfn 6522  ⟶wf 6523  ‘cfv 6527

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pr 5390

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-csb 3847  df-dif 3901  df-un 3903  df-in 3905  df-ss 3915  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-sn 4584  df-pr 4586  df-op 4590  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-mpt 5186  df-id 5542  df-xp 5653  df-rel 5654  df-cnv 5655  df-co 5656  df-dm 5657  df-rn 5658  df-res 5659  df-ima 5660  df-iota 6483  df-fun 6529  df-fn 6530  df-f 6531  df-f1 6532  df-fo 6533  df-f1o 6534  df-fv 6535

This theorem is used by:  ssmapsn  46150