Theorem isabv 21119

Description: Elementhood in the set of absolute values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
abvfval.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅)
abvfval.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
abvfval.p	⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅)
abvfval.t	⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅)
abvfval.z	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isabv	⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶(0[,)+∞) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (((𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 0 ) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) · (𝐹‘𝑦)) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑥) + (𝐹‘𝑦)))))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐵   𝑥,𝐹,𝑦   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥, 𝑦)   + (𝑥, 𝑦)   · (𝑥, 𝑦)   0 (𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem isabv

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		abvfval.a	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅)
2		abvfval.b	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
3		abvfval.p	. . . 4 ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅)
4		abvfval.t	. . . 4 ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅)
5		abvfval.z	. . . 4 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	abvfval 21118	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∈ ((0[,)+∞) ↑m 𝐵) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (((𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 0 ) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) · (𝑓‘𝑦)) ∧ (𝑓‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) ≤ ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦))))})
7	6	eleq2d 2850	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑓 ∈ ((0[,)+∞) ↑m 𝐵) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (((𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 0 ) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) · (𝑓‘𝑦)) ∧ (𝑓‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) ≤ ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦))))}))
8		fveq1 6915	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
9	8	eqeq1d 2765	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0))
10	9	bibi1d 346	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (((𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 0 ) ↔ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 0 )))
11		fveq1 6915	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = (𝐹‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)))
12		fveq1 6915	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑦))
13	8, 12	oveq12d 7469	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓‘𝑥) · (𝑓‘𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) · (𝐹‘𝑦)))
14	11, 13	eqeq12d 2779	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) · (𝑓‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝐹‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) · (𝐹‘𝑦))))
15		fveq1 6915	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) = (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)))
16	8, 12	oveq12d 7469	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) + (𝐹‘𝑦)))
17	15, 16	breq12d 5121	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) ≤ ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑥) + (𝐹‘𝑦))))
18	14, 17	anbi12d 644	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (((𝑓‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) · (𝑓‘𝑦)) ∧ (𝑓‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) ≤ ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦))) ↔ ((𝐹‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) · (𝐹‘𝑦)) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑥) + (𝐹‘𝑦)))))
19	18	ralbidv 3189	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) · (𝑓‘𝑦)) ∧ (𝑓‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) ≤ ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦))) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) · (𝐹‘𝑦)) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑥) + (𝐹‘𝑦)))))
20	10, 19	anbi12d 644	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((((𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 0 ) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) · (𝑓‘𝑦)) ∧ (𝑓‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) ≤ ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦)))) ↔ (((𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 0 ) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) · (𝐹‘𝑦)) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑥) + (𝐹‘𝑦))))))
21	20	ralbidv 3189	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (((𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 0 ) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) · (𝑓‘𝑦)) ∧ (𝑓‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) ≤ ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦)))) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (((𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 0 ) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) · (𝐹‘𝑦)) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑥) + (𝐹‘𝑦))))))
22	21	elrab 3648	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ {𝑓 ∈ ((0[,)+∞) ↑m 𝐵) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (((𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 0 ) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) · (𝑓‘𝑦)) ∧ (𝑓‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) ≤ ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦))))} ↔ (𝐹 ∈ ((0[,)+∞) ↑m 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (((𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 0 ) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) · (𝐹‘𝑦)) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑥) + (𝐹‘𝑦))))))
23		ovex 7484	. . . . 5 ⊢ (0[,)+∞) ∈ V
24	2	fvexi 6930	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
25	23, 24	elmap 8937	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ((0[,)+∞) ↑m 𝐵) ↔ 𝐹:𝐵⟶(0[,)+∞))
26	25	anbi1i 636	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ ((0[,)+∞) ↑m 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (((𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 0 ) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) · (𝐹‘𝑦)) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑥) + (𝐹‘𝑦))))) ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶(0[,)+∞) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (((𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 0 ) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) · (𝐹‘𝑦)) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑥) + (𝐹‘𝑦))))))
27	22, 26	bitri 278	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ {𝑓 ∈ ((0[,)+∞) ↑m 𝐵) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (((𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 0 ) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) · (𝑓‘𝑦)) ∧ (𝑓‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) ≤ ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦))))} ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶(0[,)+∞) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (((𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 0 ) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) · (𝐹‘𝑦)) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑥) + (𝐹‘𝑦))))))
28	7, 27	bitrdi 290	1 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶(0[,)+∞) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (((𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 0 ) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) · (𝐹‘𝑦)) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑥) + (𝐹‘𝑦)))))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ∀wral 3080  {crab 3416   class class class wbr 5108  ⟶wf 6562  ‘cfv 6566  (class class class)co 7451   ↑_m cmap 8885  0cc0 11239   + caddc 11242   · cmul 11244  +∞cpnf 11379   ≤ cle 11383  [,)cico 13518  Basecbs 17431  +_gcplusg 17472  ._rcmulr 17473  0_gc0g 17660  Ringcrg 20510  AbsValcabv 21116

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5266  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7783

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-uni 4873  df-br 5109  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5553  df-xp 5664  df-rel 5665  df-cnv 5666  df-co 5667  df-dm 5668  df-rn 5669  df-iota 6520  df-fun 6568  df-fn 6569  df-f 6570  df-fv 6574  df-ov 7454  df-oprab 7455  df-mpo 7456  df-map 8887  df-abv 21117

This theorem is used by:  isabvd  21120  abvfge0  21122  abveq0  21126  abvmul  21129  abvtri  21130  abvpropd  21143