Theorem mdvval 35686

Description: The set of disjoint variable conditions, which are pairs of distinct variables. (This definition differs from appendix C, which uses unordered pairs instead. We use ordered pairs, but all sets of disjoint variable conditions of interest will be symmetric, so it does not matter.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mdvval.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)
mdvval.d	⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mdvval	⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I )

Proof of Theorem mdvval

Dummy variable 𝑡 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mdvval.d	. 2 ⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)
2		fveq2 6840	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mVR‘𝑡) = (mVR‘𝑇))
3		mdvval.v	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)
4	2, 3	eqtr4di 2789	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mVR‘𝑡) = 𝑉)
5	4	sqxpeqd 5663	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) = (𝑉 × 𝑉))
6	5	difeq1d 4065	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) ∖ I ) = ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I ))
7		df-mdv 35670	. . . 4 ⊢ mDV = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) ∖ I ))
8		fvex 6853	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (mVR‘𝑡) ∈ V
9	8, 8	xpex 7707	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) ∈ V
10		difexg 5270	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) ∈ V → (((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) ∖ I ) ∈ V)
11	9, 10	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) ∖ I ) ∈ V
12	6, 7, 11	fvmpt3i 6953	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ V → (mDV‘𝑇) = ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I ))
13		0dif 4345	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∅ ∖ I ) = ∅
14	13	eqcomi 2745	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ = (∅ ∖ I )
15		fvprc 6832	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (mDV‘𝑇) = ∅)
16		fvprc 6832	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (mVR‘𝑇) = ∅)
17	3, 16	eqtrid 2783	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → 𝑉 = ∅)
18	17	xpeq2d 5661	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (𝑉 × 𝑉) = (𝑉 × ∅))
19		xp0 5731	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑉 × ∅) = ∅
20	18, 19	eqtrdi 2787	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (𝑉 × 𝑉) = ∅)
21	20	difeq1d 4065	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I ) = (∅ ∖ I ))
22	14, 15, 21	3eqtr4a 2797	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (mDV‘𝑇) = ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I ))
23	12, 22	pm2.61i 182	. 2 ⊢ (mDV‘𝑇) = ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I )
24	1, 23	eqtri 2759	1 ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I )

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  Vcvv 3429   ∖ cdif 3886  ∅c0 4273   I cid 5525   × cxp 5629  ‘cfv 6498  mVRcmvar 35643  mDVcmdv 35650

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5231  ax-nul 5241  ax-pow 5307  ax-pr 5375  ax-un 7689

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3062  df-rab 3390  df-v 3431  df-dif 3892  df-un 3894  df-in 3896  df-ss 3906  df-nul 4274  df-if 4467  df-pw 4543  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-uni 4851  df-br 5086  df-opab 5148  df-mpt 5167  df-id 5526  df-xp 5637  df-rel 5638  df-cnv 5639  df-co 5640  df-dm 5641  df-iota 6454  df-fun 6500  df-fv 6506  df-mdv 35670

This theorem is referenced by:  mthmpps  35764  mclsppslem  35765