Theorem mdvval 35698

Description: The set of disjoint variable conditions, which are pairs of distinct variables. (This definition differs from appendix C, which uses unordered pairs instead. We use ordered pairs, but all sets of disjoint variable conditions of interest will be symmetric, so it does not matter.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mdvval.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)
mdvval.d	⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mdvval	⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I )

Proof of Theorem mdvval

Dummy variable 𝑡 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mdvval.d	. 2 ⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)
2		fveq2 6834	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mVR‘𝑡) = (mVR‘𝑇))
3		mdvval.v	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)
4	2, 3	eqtr4di 2789	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mVR‘𝑡) = 𝑉)
5	4	sqxpeqd 5656	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) = (𝑉 × 𝑉))
6	5	difeq1d 4077	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) ∖ I ) = ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I ))
7		df-mdv 35682	. . . 4 ⊢ mDV = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) ∖ I ))
8		fvex 6847	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (mVR‘𝑡) ∈ V
9	8, 8	xpex 7698	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) ∈ V
10		difexg 5274	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) ∈ V → (((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) ∖ I ) ∈ V)
11	9, 10	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) ∖ I ) ∈ V
12	6, 7, 11	fvmpt3i 6946	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ V → (mDV‘𝑇) = ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I ))
13		0dif 4357	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∅ ∖ I ) = ∅
14	13	eqcomi 2745	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ = (∅ ∖ I )
15		fvprc 6826	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (mDV‘𝑇) = ∅)
16		fvprc 6826	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (mVR‘𝑇) = ∅)
17	3, 16	eqtrid 2783	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → 𝑉 = ∅)
18	17	xpeq2d 5654	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (𝑉 × 𝑉) = (𝑉 × ∅))
19		xp0 5724	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑉 × ∅) = ∅
20	18, 19	eqtrdi 2787	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (𝑉 × 𝑉) = ∅)
21	20	difeq1d 4077	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I ) = (∅ ∖ I ))
22	14, 15, 21	3eqtr4a 2797	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (mDV‘𝑇) = ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I ))
23	12, 22	pm2.61i 182	. 2 ⊢ (mDV‘𝑇) = ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I )
24	1, 23	eqtri 2759	1 ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I )

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2113  Vcvv 3440   ∖ cdif 3898  ∅c0 4285   I cid 5518   × cxp 5622  ‘cfv 6492  mVRcmvar 35655  mDVcmdv 35662

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2146  ax-11 2162  ax-12 2184  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5241  ax-nul 5251  ax-pow 5310  ax-pr 5377  ax-un 7680

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rab 3400  df-v 3442  df-dif 3904  df-un 3906  df-in 3908  df-ss 3918  df-nul 4286  df-if 4480  df-pw 4556  df-sn 4581  df-pr 4583  df-op 4587  df-uni 4864  df-br 5099  df-opab 5161  df-mpt 5180  df-id 5519  df-xp 5630  df-rel 5631  df-cnv 5632  df-co 5633  df-dm 5634  df-iota 6448  df-fun 6494  df-fv 6500  df-mdv 35682

This theorem is referenced by:  mthmpps  35776  mclsppslem  35777