Theorem mdvval 32864

Description: The set of disjoint variable conditions, which are pairs of distinct variables. (This definition differs from appendix C, which uses unordered pairs instead. We use ordered pairs, but all sets of disjoint variable conditions of interest will be symmetric, so it does not matter.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mdvval.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)
mdvval.d	⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mdvval	⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I )

Proof of Theorem mdvval

Dummy variable 𝑡 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mdvval.d	. 2 ⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)
2		fveq2 6645	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mVR‘𝑡) = (mVR‘𝑇))
3		mdvval.v	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)
4	2, 3	eqtr4di 2851	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mVR‘𝑡) = 𝑉)
5	4	sqxpeqd 5551	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) = (𝑉 × 𝑉))
6	5	difeq1d 4049	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) ∖ I ) = ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I ))
7		df-mdv 32848	. . . 4 ⊢ mDV = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) ∖ I ))
8		fvex 6658	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (mVR‘𝑡) ∈ V
9	8, 8	xpex 7456	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) ∈ V
10		difexg 5195	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) ∈ V → (((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) ∖ I ) ∈ V)
11	9, 10	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) ∖ I ) ∈ V
12	6, 7, 11	fvmpt3i 6750	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ V → (mDV‘𝑇) = ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I ))
13		0dif 4309	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∅ ∖ I ) = ∅
14	13	eqcomi 2807	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ = (∅ ∖ I )
15		fvprc 6638	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (mDV‘𝑇) = ∅)
16		fvprc 6638	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (mVR‘𝑇) = ∅)
17	3, 16	syl5eq 2845	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → 𝑉 = ∅)
18	17	xpeq2d 5549	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (𝑉 × 𝑉) = (𝑉 × ∅))
19		xp0 5982	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑉 × ∅) = ∅
20	18, 19	eqtrdi 2849	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (𝑉 × 𝑉) = ∅)
21	20	difeq1d 4049	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I ) = (∅ ∖ I ))
22	14, 15, 21	3eqtr4a 2859	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (mDV‘𝑇) = ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I ))
23	12, 22	pm2.61i 185	. 2 ⊢ (mDV‘𝑇) = ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I )
24	1, 23	eqtri 2821	1 ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I )

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   = wceq 1538   ∈ wcel 2111  Vcvv 3441   ∖ cdif 3878  ∅c0 4243   I cid 5424   × cxp 5517  ‘cfv 6324  mVRcmvar 32821  mDVcmdv 32828

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2770  ax-sep 5167  ax-nul 5174  ax-pow 5231  ax-pr 5295  ax-un 7441

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2598  df-eu 2629  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-nfc 2938  df-ral 3111  df-rex 3112  df-rab 3115  df-v 3443  df-sbc 3721  df-dif 3884  df-un 3886  df-in 3888  df-ss 3898  df-nul 4244  df-if 4426  df-pw 4499  df-sn 4526  df-pr 4528  df-op 4532  df-uni 4801  df-br 5031  df-opab 5093  df-mpt 5111  df-id 5425  df-xp 5525  df-rel 5526  df-cnv 5527  df-co 5528  df-dm 5529  df-iota 6283  df-fun 6326  df-fv 6332  df-mdv 32848

This theorem is referenced by:  mthmpps  32942  mclsppslem  32943