MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  suppval Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem suppval 7821
Description: The value of the operation constructing the support of a function. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 6-Apr-2019.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
suppval ((𝑋𝑉𝑍𝑊) → (𝑋 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}})
Distinct variable groups:   𝑖,𝑋   𝑖,𝑍
Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑖)   𝑊(𝑖)

Proof of Theorem suppval
Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-supp 7820 . . 3 supp = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}})
21a1i 11 . 2 ((𝑋𝑉𝑍𝑊) → supp = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}}))
3 dmeq 5765 . . . . 5 (𝑥 = 𝑋 → dom 𝑥 = dom 𝑋)
43adantr 481 . . . 4 ((𝑥 = 𝑋𝑧 = 𝑍) → dom 𝑥 = dom 𝑋)
5 imaeq1 5917 . . . . . 6 (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) = (𝑋 “ {𝑖}))
65adantr 481 . . . . 5 ((𝑥 = 𝑋𝑧 = 𝑍) → (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) = (𝑋 “ {𝑖}))
7 sneq 4567 . . . . . 6 (𝑧 = 𝑍 → {𝑧} = {𝑍})
87adantl 482 . . . . 5 ((𝑥 = 𝑋𝑧 = 𝑍) → {𝑧} = {𝑍})
96, 8neeq12d 3074 . . . 4 ((𝑥 = 𝑋𝑧 = 𝑍) → ((𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧} ↔ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}))
104, 9rabeqbidv 3483 . . 3 ((𝑥 = 𝑋𝑧 = 𝑍) → {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}} = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}})
1110adantl 482 . 2 (((𝑋𝑉𝑍𝑊) ∧ (𝑥 = 𝑋𝑧 = 𝑍)) → {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}} = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}})
12 elex 3510 . . 3 (𝑋𝑉𝑋 ∈ V)
1312adantr 481 . 2 ((𝑋𝑉𝑍𝑊) → 𝑋 ∈ V)
14 elex 3510 . . 3 (𝑍𝑊𝑍 ∈ V)
1514adantl 482 . 2 ((𝑋𝑉𝑍𝑊) → 𝑍 ∈ V)
16 dmexg 7602 . . . 4 (𝑋𝑉 → dom 𝑋 ∈ V)
1716adantr 481 . . 3 ((𝑋𝑉𝑍𝑊) → dom 𝑋 ∈ V)
18 rabexg 5225 . . 3 (dom 𝑋 ∈ V → {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}} ∈ V)
1917, 18syl 17 . 2 ((𝑋𝑉𝑍𝑊) → {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}} ∈ V)
202, 11, 13, 15, 19ovmpod 7291 1 ((𝑋𝑉𝑍𝑊) → (𝑋 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}})
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 396   = wceq 1528  wcel 2105  wne 3013  {crab 3139  Vcvv 3492  {csn 4557  dom cdm 5548  cima 5551  (class class class)co 7145  cmpo 7147   supp csupp 7819
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1787  ax-4 1801  ax-5 1902  ax-6 1961  ax-7 2006  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2136  ax-11 2151  ax-12 2167  ax-ext 2790  ax-sep 5194  ax-nul 5201  ax-pr 5320  ax-un 7450
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 842  df-3an 1081  df-tru 1531  df-ex 1772  df-nf 1776  df-sb 2061  df-mo 2615  df-eu 2647  df-clab 2797  df-cleq 2811  df-clel 2890  df-nfc 2960  df-ne 3014  df-ral 3140  df-rex 3141  df-rab 3144  df-v 3494  df-sbc 3770  df-dif 3936  df-un 3938  df-in 3940  df-ss 3949  df-nul 4289  df-if 4464  df-sn 4558  df-pr 4560  df-op 4564  df-uni 4831  df-br 5058  df-opab 5120  df-id 5453  df-xp 5554  df-rel 5555  df-cnv 5556  df-co 5557  df-dm 5558  df-rn 5559  df-res 5560  df-ima 5561  df-iota 6307  df-fun 6350  df-fv 6356  df-ov 7148  df-oprab 7149  df-mpo 7150  df-supp 7820
This theorem is referenced by:  suppvalbr  7823  supp0  7824  suppval1  7825  suppssdm  7832  suppsnop  7833  ressuppss  7838  ressuppssdif  7840
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator