Theorem suppval 8159

Description: The value of the operation constructing the support of a function. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 6-Apr-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suppval	⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑖,𝑋   𝑖,𝑍

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑖)   𝑊(𝑖)

Proof of Theorem suppval

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-supp 8158	. . 3 ⊢ supp = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}})
2	1	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → supp = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}}))
3		dmeq 5895	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → dom 𝑥 = dom 𝑋)
4	3	adantr 485	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑍) → dom 𝑥 = dom 𝑋)
5		imaeq1 6059	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) = (𝑋 “ {𝑖}))
6	5	adantr 485	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑍) → (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) = (𝑋 “ {𝑖}))
7		sneq 4600	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → {𝑧} = {𝑍})
8	7	adantl 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑍) → {𝑧} = {𝑍})
9	6, 8	neeq12d 3019	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑍) → ((𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧} ↔ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}))
10	4, 9	rabeqbidv 3434	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑍) → {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}} = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}})
11	10	adantl 486	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑍)) → {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}} = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}})
12		elex 3476	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑋 ∈ V)
13	12	adantr 485	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝑋 ∈ V)
14		elex 3476	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑍 ∈ V)
15	14	adantl 486	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝑍 ∈ V)
16		dmexg 7899	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝑋 ∈ V)
17	16	adantr 485	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → dom 𝑋 ∈ V)
18		rabexg 5309	. . 3 ⊢ (dom 𝑋 ∈ V → {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}} ∈ V)
19	17, 18	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}} ∈ V)
20	2, 11, 13, 15, 19	ovmpod 7564	1 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143   ≠ wne 2958  {crab 3416  Vcvv 3455  {csn 4590  dom cdm 5663   “ cima 5666  (class class class)co 7412   ∈ cmpo 7414   supp csupp 8157

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5258  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7734

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3746  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4591  df-pr 4593  df-op 4597  df-uni 4874  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fv 6546  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-supp 8158

This theorem is referenced by:  suppvalbr  8161  supp0  8162  suppval1  8163  suppssdm  8174  suppsnop  8175  ressuppss  8180  ressuppssdif  8182