Theorem suppval 8114

Description: The value of the operation constructing the support of a function. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 6-Apr-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suppval	⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑖,𝑋   𝑖,𝑍

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑖)   𝑊(𝑖)

Proof of Theorem suppval

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-supp 8113	. . 3 ⊢ supp = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}})
2	1	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → supp = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}}))
3		dmeq 5860	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → dom 𝑥 = dom 𝑋)
4	3	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑍) → dom 𝑥 = dom 𝑋)
5		imaeq1 6022	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) = (𝑋 “ {𝑖}))
6	5	adantr 480	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑍) → (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) = (𝑋 “ {𝑖}))
7		sneq 4592	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → {𝑧} = {𝑍})
8	7	adantl 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑍) → {𝑧} = {𝑍})
9	6, 8	neeq12d 2994	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑍) → ((𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧} ↔ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}))
10	4, 9	rabeqbidv 3419	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑍) → {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}} = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}})
11	10	adantl 481	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑍)) → {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}} = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}})
12		elex 3463	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑋 ∈ V)
13	12	adantr 480	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝑋 ∈ V)
14		elex 3463	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑍 ∈ V)
15	14	adantl 481	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝑍 ∈ V)
16		dmexg 7853	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝑋 ∈ V)
17	16	adantr 480	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → dom 𝑋 ∈ V)
18		rabexg 5284	. . 3 ⊢ (dom 𝑋 ∈ V → {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}} ∈ V)
19	17, 18	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}} ∈ V)
20	2, 11, 13, 15, 19	ovmpod 7520	1 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114   ≠ wne 2933  {crab 3401  Vcvv 3442  {csn 4582  dom cdm 5632   “ cima 5635  (class class class)co 7368   ∈ cmpo 7370   supp csupp 8112

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5243  ax-pr 5379  ax-un 7690

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-rab 3402  df-v 3444  df-sbc 3743  df-dif 3906  df-un 3908  df-in 3910  df-ss 3920  df-nul 4288  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589  df-uni 4866  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-id 5527  df-xp 5638  df-rel 5639  df-cnv 5640  df-co 5641  df-dm 5642  df-rn 5643  df-res 5644  df-ima 5645  df-iota 6456  df-fun 6502  df-fv 6508  df-ov 7371  df-oprab 7372  df-mpo 7373  df-supp 8113

This theorem is referenced by:  suppvalbr  8116  supp0  8117  suppval1  8118  suppssdm  8129  suppsnop  8130  ressuppss  8135  ressuppssdif  8137