Theorem suppval 8112

Description: The value of the operation constructing the support of a function. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 6-Apr-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suppval	⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑖,𝑋   𝑖,𝑍

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑖)   𝑊(𝑖)

Proof of Theorem suppval

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-supp 8111	. . 3 ⊢ supp = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}})
2	1	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → supp = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}}))
3		dmeq 5858	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → dom 𝑥 = dom 𝑋)
4	3	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑍) → dom 𝑥 = dom 𝑋)
5		imaeq1 6020	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) = (𝑋 “ {𝑖}))
6	5	adantr 480	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑍) → (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) = (𝑋 “ {𝑖}))
7		sneq 4577	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → {𝑧} = {𝑍})
8	7	adantl 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑍) → {𝑧} = {𝑍})
9	6, 8	neeq12d 2993	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑍) → ((𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧} ↔ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}))
10	4, 9	rabeqbidv 3407	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑍) → {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}} = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}})
11	10	adantl 481	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑍)) → {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}} = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}})
12		elex 3450	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑋 ∈ V)
13	12	adantr 480	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝑋 ∈ V)
14		elex 3450	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑍 ∈ V)
15	14	adantl 481	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝑍 ∈ V)
16		dmexg 7852	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝑋 ∈ V)
17	16	adantr 480	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → dom 𝑋 ∈ V)
18		rabexg 5278	. . 3 ⊢ (dom 𝑋 ∈ V → {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}} ∈ V)
19	17, 18	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}} ∈ V)
20	2, 11, 13, 15, 19	ovmpod 7519	1 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114   ≠ wne 2932  {crab 3389  Vcvv 3429  {csn 4567  dom cdm 5631   “ cima 5634  (class class class)co 7367   ∈ cmpo 7369   supp csupp 8110

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5231  ax-pr 5375  ax-un 7689

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3062  df-rab 3390  df-v 3431  df-sbc 3729  df-dif 3892  df-un 3894  df-in 3896  df-ss 3906  df-nul 4274  df-if 4467  df-pw 4543  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-uni 4851  df-br 5086  df-opab 5148  df-id 5526  df-xp 5637  df-rel 5638  df-cnv 5639  df-co 5640  df-dm 5641  df-rn 5642  df-res 5643  df-ima 5644  df-iota 6454  df-fun 6500  df-fv 6506  df-ov 7370  df-oprab 7371  df-mpo 7372  df-supp 8111

This theorem is referenced by:  suppvalbr  8114  supp0  8115  suppval1  8116  suppssdm  8127  suppsnop  8128  ressuppss  8133  ressuppssdif  8135