MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  tgcolg Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem tgcolg 28562
Description: We choose the notation (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) instead of "colinear" in order to avoid defining an additional symbol for colinearity because LineG is a common structure slot for other axiomatizations of geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
tglngval.p 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
tglngval.l 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
tglngval.i 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
tglngval.g (𝜑𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
tglngval.x (𝜑𝑋𝑃)
tglngval.y (𝜑𝑌𝑃)
tgcolg.z (𝜑𝑍𝑃)
Assertion
Ref Expression
tgcolg (𝜑 → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))

Proof of Theorem tgcolg
StepHypRef Expression
1 animorr 981 . . 3 ((𝜑𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
2 tglngval.p . . . . . 6 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
3 eqid 2737 . . . . . 6 (dist‘𝐺) = (dist‘𝐺)
4 tglngval.i . . . . . 6 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
5 tglngval.g . . . . . . 7 (𝜑𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
65adantr 480 . . . . . 6 ((𝜑𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
7 tgcolg.z . . . . . . 7 (𝜑𝑍𝑃)
87adantr 480 . . . . . 6 ((𝜑𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑍𝑃)
9 tglngval.x . . . . . . 7 (𝜑𝑋𝑃)
109adantr 480 . . . . . 6 ((𝜑𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋𝑃)
112, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10tgbtwntriv2 28495 . . . . 5 ((𝜑𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋))
12 simpr 484 . . . . . 6 ((𝜑𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)
1312oveq2d 7447 . . . . 5 ((𝜑𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝑍𝐼𝑋) = (𝑍𝐼𝑌))
1411, 13eleqtrd 2843 . . . 4 ((𝜑𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌))
15143mix2d 1338 . . 3 ((𝜑𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))
161, 152thd 265 . 2 ((𝜑𝑋 = 𝑌) → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
17 simpr 484 . . . . . 6 ((𝜑𝑋𝑌) → 𝑋𝑌)
1817neneqd 2945 . . . . 5 ((𝜑𝑋𝑌) → ¬ 𝑋 = 𝑌)
19 biorf 937 . . . . 5 𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑋 = 𝑌𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))))
2018, 19syl 17 . . . 4 ((𝜑𝑋𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑋 = 𝑌𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))))
21 orcom 871 . . . 4 ((𝑋 = 𝑌𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌)) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
2220, 21bitrdi 287 . . 3 ((𝜑𝑋𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌)))
23 tglngval.l . . . 4 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
245adantr 480 . . . 4 ((𝜑𝑋𝑌) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
259adantr 480 . . . 4 ((𝜑𝑋𝑌) → 𝑋𝑃)
26 tglngval.y . . . . 5 (𝜑𝑌𝑃)
2726adantr 480 . . . 4 ((𝜑𝑋𝑌) → 𝑌𝑃)
287adantr 480 . . . 4 ((𝜑𝑋𝑌) → 𝑍𝑃)
292, 23, 4, 24, 25, 27, 17, 28tgellng 28561 . . 3 ((𝜑𝑋𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
3022, 29bitr3d 281 . 2 ((𝜑𝑋𝑌) → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
3116, 30pm2.61dane 3029 1 (𝜑 → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4  wb 206  wa 395  wo 848  w3o 1086   = wceq 1540  wcel 2108  wne 2940  cfv 6561  (class class class)co 7431  Basecbs 17247  distcds 17306  TarskiGcstrkg 28435  Itvcitv 28441  LineGclng 28442
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5296  ax-nul 5306  ax-pr 5432
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2892  df-ne 2941  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3437  df-v 3482  df-sbc 3789  df-dif 3954  df-un 3956  df-in 3958  df-ss 3968  df-nul 4334  df-if 4526  df-pw 4602  df-sn 4627  df-pr 4629  df-op 4633  df-uni 4908  df-br 5144  df-opab 5206  df-id 5578  df-xp 5691  df-rel 5692  df-cnv 5693  df-co 5694  df-dm 5695  df-iota 6514  df-fun 6563  df-fv 6569  df-ov 7434  df-oprab 7435  df-mpo 7436  df-trkgc 28456  df-trkgcb 28458  df-trkg 28461
This theorem is referenced by:  btwncolg1  28563  btwncolg2  28564  btwncolg3  28565  colcom  28566  colrot1  28567  lnxfr  28574  lnext  28575  tgfscgr  28576  tglowdim2l  28658  outpasch  28763
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator