Theorem tgcolg 28238

Description: We choose the notation (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) instead of "colinear" in order to avoid defining an additional symbol for colinearity because LineG is a common structure slot for other axiomatizations of geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tglngval.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
tglngval.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
tglngval.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
tglngval.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
tglngval.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
tglngval.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
tgcolg.z	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tgcolg	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))

Proof of Theorem tgcolg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		animorr 976	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
2		tglngval.p	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
3		eqid 2731	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dist‘𝐺) = (dist‘𝐺)
4		tglngval.i	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
5		tglngval.g	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
6	5	adantr 480	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
7		tgcolg.z	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
8	7	adantr 480	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
9		tglngval.x	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
10	9	adantr 480	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
11	2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10	tgbtwntriv2 28171	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋))
12		simpr 484	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)
13	12	oveq2d 7428	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝑍𝐼𝑋) = (𝑍𝐼𝑌))
14	11, 13	eleqtrd 2834	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌))
15	14	3mix2d 1336	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))
16	1, 15	2thd 265	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
17		simpr 484	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
18	17	neneqd 2944	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → ¬ 𝑋 = 𝑌)
19		biorf 934	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑋 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))))
20	18, 19	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑋 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))))
21		orcom 867	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑋 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌)) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
22	20, 21	bitrdi 287	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌)))
23		tglngval.l	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
24	5	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
25	9	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
26		tglngval.y	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
27	26	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
28	7	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
29	2, 23, 4, 24, 25, 27, 17, 28	tgellng 28237	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
30	22, 29	bitr3d 281	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
31	16, 30	pm2.61dane 3028	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   ∨ wo 844   ∨ w3o 1085   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2105   ≠ wne 2939  ‘cfv 6543  (class class class)co 7412  Basecbs 17151  distcds 17213  TarskiGcstrkg 28111  Itvcitv 28117  LineGclng 28118

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2136  ax-11 2153  ax-12 2170  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5299  ax-nul 5306  ax-pr 5427

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2067  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2809  df-nfc 2884  df-ne 2940  df-ral 3061  df-rex 3070  df-rab 3432  df-v 3475  df-sbc 3778  df-dif 3951  df-un 3953  df-in 3955  df-ss 3965  df-nul 4323  df-if 4529  df-sn 4629  df-pr 4631  df-op 4635  df-uni 4909  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-id 5574  df-xp 5682  df-rel 5683  df-cnv 5684  df-co 5685  df-dm 5686  df-iota 6495  df-fun 6545  df-fv 6551  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-trkgc 28132  df-trkgcb 28134  df-trkg 28137

This theorem is referenced by:  btwncolg1  28239  btwncolg2  28240  btwncolg3  28241  colcom  28242  colrot1  28243  lnxfr  28250  lnext  28251  tgfscgr  28252  tglowdim2l  28334  outpasch  28439