Theorem tgcolg 28488

Description: We choose the notation (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) instead of "colinear" in order to avoid defining an additional symbol for colinearity because LineG is a common structure slot for other axiomatizations of geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tglngval.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
tglngval.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
tglngval.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
tglngval.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
tglngval.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
tglngval.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
tgcolg.z	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tgcolg	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))

Proof of Theorem tgcolg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		animorr 980	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
2		tglngval.p	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
3		eqid 2730	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dist‘𝐺) = (dist‘𝐺)
4		tglngval.i	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
5		tglngval.g	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
6	5	adantr 480	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
7		tgcolg.z	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
8	7	adantr 480	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
9		tglngval.x	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
10	9	adantr 480	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
11	2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10	tgbtwntriv2 28421	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋))
12		simpr 484	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)
13	12	oveq2d 7406	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝑍𝐼𝑋) = (𝑍𝐼𝑌))
14	11, 13	eleqtrd 2831	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌))
15	14	3mix2d 1338	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))
16	1, 15	2thd 265	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
17		simpr 484	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
18	17	neneqd 2931	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → ¬ 𝑋 = 𝑌)
19		biorf 936	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑋 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))))
20	18, 19	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑋 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))))
21		orcom 870	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑋 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌)) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
22	20, 21	bitrdi 287	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌)))
23		tglngval.l	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
24	5	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
25	9	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
26		tglngval.y	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
27	26	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
28	7	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
29	2, 23, 4, 24, 25, 27, 17, 28	tgellng 28487	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
30	22, 29	bitr3d 281	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
31	16, 30	pm2.61dane 3013	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∨ wo 847   ∨ w3o 1085   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109   ≠ wne 2926  ‘cfv 6514  (class class class)co 7390  Basecbs 17186  distcds 17236  TarskiGcstrkg 28361  Itvcitv 28367  LineGclng 28368

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5254  ax-nul 5264  ax-pr 5390

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ne 2927  df-ral 3046  df-rex 3055  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3757  df-dif 3920  df-un 3922  df-in 3924  df-ss 3934  df-nul 4300  df-if 4492  df-pw 4568  df-sn 4593  df-pr 4595  df-op 4599  df-uni 4875  df-br 5111  df-opab 5173  df-id 5536  df-xp 5647  df-rel 5648  df-cnv 5649  df-co 5650  df-dm 5651  df-iota 6467  df-fun 6516  df-fv 6522  df-ov 7393  df-oprab 7394  df-mpo 7395  df-trkgc 28382  df-trkgcb 28384  df-trkg 28387

This theorem is referenced by:  btwncolg1  28489  btwncolg2  28490  btwncolg3  28491  colcom  28492  colrot1  28493  lnxfr  28500  lnext  28501  tgfscgr  28502  tglowdim2l  28584  outpasch  28689