Theorem tgcolg 28481

Description: We choose the notation (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) instead of "colinear" in order to avoid defining an additional symbol for colinearity because LineG is a common structure slot for other axiomatizations of geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tglngval.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
tglngval.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
tglngval.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
tglngval.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
tglngval.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
tglngval.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
tgcolg.z	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tgcolg	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))

Proof of Theorem tgcolg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		animorr 980	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
2		tglngval.p	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
3		eqid 2729	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dist‘𝐺) = (dist‘𝐺)
4		tglngval.i	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
5		tglngval.g	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
6	5	adantr 480	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
7		tgcolg.z	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
8	7	adantr 480	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
9		tglngval.x	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
10	9	adantr 480	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
11	2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10	tgbtwntriv2 28414	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋))
12		simpr 484	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)
13	12	oveq2d 7403	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝑍𝐼𝑋) = (𝑍𝐼𝑌))
14	11, 13	eleqtrd 2830	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌))
15	14	3mix2d 1338	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))
16	1, 15	2thd 265	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
17		simpr 484	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
18	17	neneqd 2930	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → ¬ 𝑋 = 𝑌)
19		biorf 936	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑋 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))))
20	18, 19	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑋 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))))
21		orcom 870	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑋 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌)) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
22	20, 21	bitrdi 287	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌)))
23		tglngval.l	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
24	5	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
25	9	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
26		tglngval.y	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
27	26	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
28	7	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
29	2, 23, 4, 24, 25, 27, 17, 28	tgellng 28480	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
30	22, 29	bitr3d 281	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
31	16, 30	pm2.61dane 3012	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∨ wo 847   ∨ w3o 1085   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109   ≠ wne 2925  ‘cfv 6511  (class class class)co 7387  Basecbs 17179  distcds 17229  TarskiGcstrkg 28354  Itvcitv 28360  LineGclng 28361

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pr 5387

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-sbc 3754  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-id 5533  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fv 6519  df-ov 7390  df-oprab 7391  df-mpo 7392  df-trkgc 28375  df-trkgcb 28377  df-trkg 28380

This theorem is referenced by:  btwncolg1  28482  btwncolg2  28483  btwncolg3  28484  colcom  28485  colrot1  28486  lnxfr  28493  lnext  28494  tgfscgr  28495  tglowdim2l  28577  outpasch  28682