| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > wwlksn | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: The set of walks (in an undirected graph) of a fixed length as words over the set of vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 8-Apr-2021.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| wwlksn | ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)}) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | fveq2 6858 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (WWalks‘𝑔) = (WWalks‘𝐺)) | |
| 2 | 1 | adantl 481 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (WWalks‘𝑔) = (WWalks‘𝐺)) |
| 3 | oveq1 7394 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → (𝑛 + 1) = (𝑁 + 1)) | |
| 4 | 3 | eqeq2d 2740 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → ((♯‘𝑤) = (𝑛 + 1) ↔ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1))) |
| 5 | 4 | adantr 480 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → ((♯‘𝑤) = (𝑛 + 1) ↔ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1))) |
| 6 | 2, 5 | rabeqbidv 3424 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝑔) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑛 + 1)} = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)}) |
| 7 | df-wwlksn 29761 | . . . 4 ⊢ WWalksN = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝑔) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑛 + 1)}) | |
| 8 | fvex 6871 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∈ V | |
| 9 | 8 | rabex 5294 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)} ∈ V |
| 10 | 6, 7, 9 | ovmpoa 7544 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V) → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)}) |
| 11 | 10 | expcom 413 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ V → (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)})) |
| 12 | 7 | reldmmpo 7523 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Rel dom WWalksN |
| 13 | 12 | ovprc2 7427 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = ∅) |
| 14 | fvprc 6850 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → (WWalks‘𝐺) = ∅) | |
| 15 | 14 | rabeqdv 3421 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)} = {𝑤 ∈ ∅ ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)}) |
| 16 | rab0 4349 | . . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ ∅ ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)} = ∅ | |
| 17 | 15, 16 | eqtrdi 2780 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)} = ∅) |
| 18 | 13, 17 | eqtr4d 2767 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)}) |
| 19 | 18 | a1d 25 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)})) |
| 20 | 11, 19 | pm2.61i 182 | 1 ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)}) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1540 ∈ wcel 2109 {crab 3405 Vcvv 3447 ∅c0 4296 ‘cfv 6511 (class class class)co 7387 1c1 11069 + caddc 11071 ℕ0cn0 12442 ♯chash 14295 WWalkscwwlks 29755 WWalksN cwwlksn 29756 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1910 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2008 ax-8 2111 ax-9 2119 ax-10 2142 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2178 ax-ext 2701 ax-sep 5251 ax-nul 5261 ax-pr 5387 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1543 df-fal 1553 df-ex 1780 df-nf 1784 df-sb 2066 df-mo 2533 df-eu 2562 df-clab 2708 df-cleq 2721 df-clel 2803 df-nfc 2878 df-ne 2926 df-ral 3045 df-rex 3054 df-rab 3406 df-v 3449 df-sbc 3754 df-dif 3917 df-un 3919 df-in 3921 df-ss 3931 df-nul 4297 df-if 4489 df-pw 4565 df-sn 4590 df-pr 4592 df-op 4596 df-uni 4872 df-br 5108 df-opab 5170 df-id 5533 df-xp 5644 df-rel 5645 df-cnv 5646 df-co 5647 df-dm 5648 df-iota 6464 df-fun 6513 df-fv 6519 df-ov 7390 df-oprab 7391 df-mpo 7392 df-wwlksn 29761 |
| This theorem is referenced by: iswwlksn 29768 wwlksn0s 29791 0enwwlksnge1 29794 wlknwwlksnbij 29818 wwlksnfi 29836 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |