| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > wwlksn | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: The set of walks (in an undirected graph) of a fixed length as words over the set of vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 8-Apr-2021.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| wwlksn | ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)}) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | fveq2 6831 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (WWalks‘𝑔) = (WWalks‘𝐺)) | |
| 2 | 1 | adantl 483 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (WWalks‘𝑔) = (WWalks‘𝐺)) |
| 3 | oveq1 7367 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → (𝑛 + 1) = (𝑁 + 1)) | |
| 4 | 3 | eqeq2d 2752 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → ((♯‘𝑤) = (𝑛 + 1) ↔ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1))) |
| 5 | 4 | adantr 482 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → ((♯‘𝑤) = (𝑛 + 1) ↔ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1))) |
| 6 | 2, 5 | rabeqbidv 3411 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝑔) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑛 + 1)} = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)}) |
| 7 | df-wwlksn 29921 | . . . 4 ⊢ WWalksN = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝑔) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑛 + 1)}) | |
| 8 | fvex 6844 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∈ V | |
| 9 | 8 | rabex 5270 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)} ∈ V |
| 10 | 6, 7, 9 | ovmpoa 7515 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V) → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)}) |
| 11 | 10 | expcom 415 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ V → (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)})) |
| 12 | 7 | reldmmpo 7494 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Rel dom WWalksN |
| 13 | 12 | ovprc2 7400 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = ∅) |
| 14 | fvprc 6823 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → (WWalks‘𝐺) = ∅) | |
| 15 | 14 | rabeqdv 3408 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)} = {𝑤 ∈ ∅ ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)}) |
| 16 | rab0 4317 | . . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ ∅ ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)} = ∅ | |
| 17 | 15, 16 | eqtrdi 2792 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)} = ∅) |
| 18 | 13, 17 | eqtr4d 2779 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)}) |
| 19 | 18 | a1d 25 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)})) |
| 20 | 11, 19 | pm2.61i 183 | 1 ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)}) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 208 ∧ wa 397 = wceq 1548 ∈ wcel 2121 {crab 3393 Vcvv 3433 ∅c0 4264 ‘cfv 6489 (class class class)co 7360 1c1 11034 + caddc 11036 ℕ0cn0 12432 ♯chash 14287 WWalkscwwlks 29915 WWalksN cwwlksn 29916 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1803 ax-4 1817 ax-5 1918 ax-6 1975 ax-7 2016 ax-8 2123 ax-9 2131 ax-10 2154 ax-11 2170 ax-12 2191 ax-ext 2713 ax-sep 5221 ax-nul 5231 ax-pr 5365 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 398 df-or 855 df-3an 1095 df-tru 1551 df-fal 1561 df-ex 1788 df-nf 1792 df-sb 2075 df-mo 2545 df-eu 2575 df-clab 2720 df-cleq 2733 df-clel 2816 df-nfc 2890 df-ne 2937 df-ral 3056 df-rex 3066 df-rab 3394 df-v 3435 df-sbc 3726 df-dif 3888 df-un 3890 df-in 3892 df-ss 3902 df-nul 4265 df-if 4458 df-pw 4534 df-sn 4559 df-pr 4561 df-op 4565 df-uni 4842 df-br 5076 df-opab 5138 df-id 5516 df-xp 5627 df-rel 5628 df-cnv 5629 df-co 5630 df-dm 5631 df-iota 6445 df-fun 6491 df-fv 6497 df-ov 7363 df-oprab 7364 df-mpo 7365 df-wwlksn 29921 |
| This theorem is referenced by: iswwlksn 29928 wwlksn0s 29951 0enwwlksnge1 29954 wlknwwlksnbij 29978 wwlksnfi 29996 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |