Theorem wwlksn 30291

Description: The set of walks (in an undirected graph) of a fixed length as words over the set of vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 8-Apr-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wwlksn	⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑤,𝐺   𝑤,𝑁

Proof of Theorem wwlksn

Dummy variables 𝑔 𝑛 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq2 6882	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (WWalks‘𝑔) = (WWalks‘𝐺))
2	1	adantl 487	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (WWalks‘𝑔) = (WWalks‘𝐺))
3		oveq1 7423	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → (𝑛 + 1) = (𝑁 + 1))
4	3	eqeq2d 2773	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → ((♯‘𝑤) = (𝑛 + 1) ↔ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)))
5	4	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → ((♯‘𝑤) = (𝑛 + 1) ↔ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)))
6	2, 5	rabeqbidv 3432	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝑔) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑛 + 1)} = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)})
7		df-wwlksn 30285	. . . 4 ⊢ WWalksN = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝑔) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑛 + 1)})
8		fvex 6895	. . . . 5 ⊢ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∈ V
9	8	rabex 5307	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)} ∈ V
10	6, 7, 9	ovmpoa 7571	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V) → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)})
11	10	expcom 419	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ V → (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)}))
12	7	reldmmpo 7550	. . . . 5 ⊢ Rel dom WWalksN
13	12	ovprc2 7456	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = ∅)
14		fvprc 6874	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → (WWalks‘𝐺) = ∅)
15	14	rabeqdv 3429	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)} = {𝑤 ∈ ∅ ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)})
16		rab0 4338	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ ∅ ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)} = ∅
17	15, 16	eqtrdi 2813	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)} = ∅)
18	13, 17	eqtr4d 2800	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)})
19	18	a1d 26	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)}))
20	11, 19	pm2.61i 184	1 ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)})

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  {crab 3414  Vcvv 3453  ∅c0 4282  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7416  1c1 11128   + caddc 11130  ℕ₀cn0 12531  ♯chash 14396  WWalkscwwlks 30279   WWalksN cwwlksn 30280

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pr 5402

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-id 5554  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7419  df-oprab 7420  df-mpo 7421  df-wwlksn 30285

This theorem is used by:  iswwlksn  30292  wwlksn0s  30315  0enwwlksnge1  30318  wlknwwlksnbij  30342  wwlksnfi  30360