| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > wwlksn | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: The set of walks (in an undirected graph) of a fixed length as words over the set of vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 8-Apr-2021.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| wwlksn | ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)}) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | fveq2 6869 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (WWalks‘𝑔) = (WWalks‘𝐺)) | |
| 2 | 1 | adantl 485 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (WWalks‘𝑔) = (WWalks‘𝐺)) |
| 3 | oveq1 7405 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → (𝑛 + 1) = (𝑁 + 1)) | |
| 4 | 3 | eqeq2d 2775 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → ((♯‘𝑤) = (𝑛 + 1) ↔ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1))) |
| 5 | 4 | adantr 484 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → ((♯‘𝑤) = (𝑛 + 1) ↔ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1))) |
| 6 | 2, 5 | rabeqbidv 3434 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝑔) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑛 + 1)} = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)}) |
| 7 | df-wwlksn 30033 | . . . 4 ⊢ WWalksN = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝑔) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑛 + 1)}) | |
| 8 | fvex 6882 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∈ V | |
| 9 | 8 | rabex 5297 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)} ∈ V |
| 10 | 6, 7, 9 | ovmpoa 7553 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V) → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)}) |
| 11 | 10 | expcom 417 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ V → (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)})) |
| 12 | 7 | reldmmpo 7532 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Rel dom WWalksN |
| 13 | 12 | ovprc2 7438 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = ∅) |
| 14 | fvprc 6861 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → (WWalks‘𝐺) = ∅) | |
| 15 | 14 | rabeqdv 3431 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)} = {𝑤 ∈ ∅ ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)}) |
| 16 | rab0 4341 | . . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ ∅ ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)} = ∅ | |
| 17 | 15, 16 | eqtrdi 2815 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)} = ∅) |
| 18 | 13, 17 | eqtr4d 2802 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)}) |
| 19 | 18 | a1d 25 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)})) |
| 20 | 11, 19 | pm2.61i 183 | 1 ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)}) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 208 ∧ wa 399 = wceq 1562 ∈ wcel 2144 {crab 3416 Vcvv 3456 ∅c0 4287 ‘cfv 6523 (class class class)co 7398 1c1 11076 + caddc 11078 ℕ0cn0 12483 ♯chash 14345 WWalkscwwlks 30027 WWalksN cwwlksn 30028 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1817 ax-4 1831 ax-5 1932 ax-6 1989 ax-7 2030 ax-8 2146 ax-9 2154 ax-10 2177 ax-11 2193 ax-12 2214 ax-ext 2736 ax-sep 5248 ax-nul 5258 ax-pr 5392 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 400 df-or 859 df-3an 1101 df-tru 1565 df-fal 1575 df-ex 1802 df-nf 1806 df-sb 2093 df-mo 2568 df-eu 2598 df-clab 2743 df-cleq 2756 df-clel 2839 df-nfc 2913 df-ne 2960 df-ral 3079 df-rex 3089 df-rab 3417 df-v 3458 df-sbc 3747 df-dif 3909 df-un 3911 df-in 3913 df-ss 3923 df-nul 4288 df-if 4483 df-pw 4559 df-sn 4585 df-pr 4587 df-op 4591 df-uni 4868 df-br 5103 df-opab 5165 df-id 5544 df-xp 5655 df-rel 5656 df-cnv 5657 df-co 5658 df-dm 5659 df-iota 6479 df-fun 6525 df-fv 6531 df-ov 7401 df-oprab 7402 df-mpo 7403 df-wwlksn 30033 |
| This theorem is referenced by: iswwlksn 30040 wwlksn0s 30063 0enwwlksnge1 30066 wlknwwlksnbij 30090 wwlksnfi 30108 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |