Theorem caofcan 41830

Description: Transfer a cancellation law like mulcan 11542 to the function operation. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 16-Nov-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
caofcan.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
caofcan.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑇)
caofcan.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆)
caofcan.4	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆)
caofcan.5	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦) = (𝑥𝑅𝑧) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
caofcan	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐻) ↔ 𝐺 = 𝐻))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐹   𝑥,𝐺,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐻,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑇,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem caofcan

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		caofcan.2	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑇)
2	1	ffnd 6585	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
3		caofcan.3	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆)
4	3	ffnd 6585	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐴)
5		caofcan.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
6		inidm 4149	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐴) = 𝐴
7		eqidd 2739	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘𝑤))
8		eqidd 2739	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐺‘𝑤))
9	2, 4, 5, 5, 6, 7, 8	ofval 7522	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺)‘𝑤) = ((𝐹‘𝑤)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑤)))
10		caofcan.4	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆)
11	10	ffnd 6585	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn 𝐴)
12		eqidd 2739	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐻‘𝑤) = (𝐻‘𝑤))
13	2, 11, 5, 5, 6, 7, 12	ofval 7522	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐻)‘𝑤) = ((𝐹‘𝑤)𝑅(𝐻‘𝑤)))
14	9, 13	eqeq12d 2754	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺)‘𝑤) = ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐻)‘𝑤) ↔ ((𝐹‘𝑤)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑤)) = ((𝐹‘𝑤)𝑅(𝐻‘𝑤))))
15		simpl 482	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑)
16	1	ffvelrnda 6943	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑤) ∈ 𝑇)
17	3	ffvelrnda 6943	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐺‘𝑤) ∈ 𝑆)
18	10	ffvelrnda 6943	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐻‘𝑤) ∈ 𝑆)
19		caofcan.5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦) = (𝑥𝑅𝑧) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧))
20	19	caovcang 7451	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑤) ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑤) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (𝐻‘𝑤) ∈ 𝑆)) → (((𝐹‘𝑤)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑤)) = ((𝐹‘𝑤)𝑅(𝐻‘𝑤)) ↔ (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐻‘𝑤)))
21	15, 16, 17, 18, 20	syl13anc 1370	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝐹‘𝑤)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑤)) = ((𝐹‘𝑤)𝑅(𝐻‘𝑤)) ↔ (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐻‘𝑤)))
22	14, 21	bitrd 278	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺)‘𝑤) = ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐻)‘𝑤) ↔ (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐻‘𝑤)))
23	22	ralbidva 3119	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺)‘𝑤) = ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐻)‘𝑤) ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐻‘𝑤)))
24	2, 4, 5, 5, 6	offn 7524	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) Fn 𝐴)
25	2, 11, 5, 5, 6	offn 7524	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐻) Fn 𝐴)
26		eqfnfv 6891	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) Fn 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐻) Fn 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐻) ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺)‘𝑤) = ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐻)‘𝑤)))
27	24, 25, 26	syl2anc 583	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐻) ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺)‘𝑤) = ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐻)‘𝑤)))
28		eqfnfv 6891	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴) → (𝐺 = 𝐻 ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐻‘𝑤)))
29	4, 11, 28	syl2anc 583	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 = 𝐻 ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐻‘𝑤)))
30	23, 27, 29	3bitr4d 310	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐻) ↔ 𝐺 = 𝐻))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1085   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  ∀wral 3063   Fn wfn 6413  ⟶wf 6414  ‘cfv 6418  (class class class)co 7255   ∘_f cof 7509

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5205  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pr 5347

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-reu 3070  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-sbc 3712  df-csb 3829  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-iun 4923  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-mpt 5154  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-rn 5591  df-res 5592  df-ima 5593  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fn 6421  df-f 6422  df-f1 6423  df-fo 6424  df-f1o 6425  df-fv 6426  df-ov 7258  df-oprab 7259  df-mpo 7260  df-of 7511

This theorem is referenced by: (None)