Theorem cnopc 29994

Description: Basic continuity property of a continuous Hilbert space operator. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cnopc	⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ ContOp ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑇,𝑦

Proof of Theorem cnopc

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elcnop 29938	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContOp ↔ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤)))
2	1	simprbi 500	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContOp → ∀𝑧 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤))
3		oveq2 7221	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧) = (𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴))
4	3	fveq2d 6721	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) = (normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)))
5	4	breq1d 5063	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 ↔ (normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥))
6		fveq2 6717	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑇‘𝑧) = (𝑇‘𝐴))
7	6	oveq2d 7229	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑧)) = ((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴)))
8	7	fveq2d 6721	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑧))) = (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))))
9	8	breq1d 5063	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤 ↔ (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤))
10	5, 9	imbi12d 348	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤) ↔ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤)))
11	10	rexralbidv 3220	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤)))
12		breq2 5057	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → ((normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤 ↔ (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵))
13	12	imbi2d 344	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤) ↔ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵)))
14	13	rexralbidv 3220	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵)))
15	11, 14	rspc2v 3547	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → (∀𝑧 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵)))
16	2, 15	syl5com 31	. 2 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContOp → ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵)))
17	16	3impib 1118	1 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ ContOp ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399   ∧ w3a 1089   = wceq 1543   ∈ wcel 2110  ∀wral 3061  ∃wrex 3062   class class class wbr 5053  ⟶wf 6376  ‘cfv 6380  (class class class)co 7213   < clt 10867  ℝ⁺crp 12586   ℋchba 29000  norm_ℎcno 29004   −_ℎ cmv 29006  ContOpccop 29027

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1976  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5192  ax-nul 5199  ax-pow 5258  ax-pr 5322  ax-un 7523  ax-hilex 29080

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 848  df-3an 1091  df-tru 1546  df-fal 1556  df-ex 1788  df-nf 1792  df-sb 2071  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2886  df-ral 3066  df-rex 3067  df-rab 3070  df-v 3410  df-sbc 3695  df-dif 3869  df-un 3871  df-in 3873  df-ss 3883  df-nul 4238  df-if 4440  df-pw 4515  df-sn 4542  df-pr 4544  df-op 4548  df-uni 4820  df-br 5054  df-opab 5116  df-id 5455  df-xp 5557  df-rel 5558  df-cnv 5559  df-co 5560  df-dm 5561  df-rn 5562  df-iota 6338  df-fun 6382  df-fn 6383  df-f 6384  df-fv 6388  df-ov 7216  df-oprab 7217  df-mpo 7218  df-map 8510  df-cnop 29921

This theorem is referenced by:  nmcopexi  30108