Theorem cnopc 31969

Description: Basic continuity property of a continuous Hilbert space operator. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cnopc	⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ ContOp ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑇,𝑦

Proof of Theorem cnopc

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elcnop 31913	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContOp ↔ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤)))
2	1	simprbi 496	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContOp → ∀𝑧 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤))
3		oveq2 7366	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧) = (𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴))
4	3	fveq2d 6837	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) = (normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)))
5	4	breq1d 5107	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 ↔ (normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥))
6		fveq2 6833	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑇‘𝑧) = (𝑇‘𝐴))
7	6	oveq2d 7374	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑧)) = ((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴)))
8	7	fveq2d 6837	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑧))) = (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))))
9	8	breq1d 5107	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤 ↔ (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤))
10	5, 9	imbi12d 344	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤) ↔ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤)))
11	10	rexralbidv 3201	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤)))
12		breq2 5101	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → ((normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤 ↔ (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵))
13	12	imbi2d 340	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤) ↔ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵)))
14	13	rexralbidv 3201	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵)))
15	11, 14	rspc2v 3586	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → (∀𝑧 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵)))
16	2, 15	syl5com 31	. 2 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContOp → ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵)))
17	16	3impib 1117	1 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ ContOp ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑦) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  ∀wral 3050  ∃wrex 3059   class class class wbr 5097  ⟶wf 6487  ‘cfv 6491  (class class class)co 7358   < clt 11168  ℝ⁺crp 12907   ℋchba 30975  norm_ℎcno 30979   −_ℎ cmv 30981  ContOpccop 31002

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2183  ax-ext 2707  ax-sep 5240  ax-nul 5250  ax-pow 5309  ax-pr 5376  ax-un 7680  ax-hilex 31055

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2538  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2884  df-ral 3051  df-rex 3060  df-rab 3399  df-v 3441  df-sbc 3740  df-dif 3903  df-un 3905  df-in 3907  df-ss 3917  df-nul 4285  df-if 4479  df-pw 4555  df-sn 4580  df-pr 4582  df-op 4586  df-uni 4863  df-br 5098  df-opab 5160  df-id 5518  df-xp 5629  df-rel 5630  df-cnv 5631  df-co 5632  df-dm 5633  df-rn 5634  df-iota 6447  df-fun 6493  df-fn 6494  df-f 6495  df-fv 6499  df-ov 7361  df-oprab 7362  df-mpo 7363  df-map 8767  df-cnop 31896

This theorem is referenced by:  nmcopexi  32083