Theorem elcnop 32341

Description: Property defining a continuous Hilbert space operator. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elcnop	⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContOp ↔ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑤,𝑦,𝑧,𝑇

Proof of Theorem elcnop

Dummy variable 𝑡 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq1 6878	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (𝑡‘𝑤) = (𝑇‘𝑤))
2		fveq1 6878	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (𝑡‘𝑥) = (𝑇‘𝑥))
3	1, 2	oveq12d 7432	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥)) = ((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥)))
4	3	fveq2d 6883	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) = (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))))
5	4	breq1d 5113	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ((normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦 ↔ (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦))
6	5	imbi2d 343	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦) ↔ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
7	6	rexralbidv 3228	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
8	7	2ralbidv 3226	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
9		df-cnop 32324	. . 3 ⊢ ContOp = {𝑡 ∈ ( ℋ ↑m ℋ) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)}
10	8, 9	elrab2 3649	. 2 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContOp ↔ (𝑇 ∈ ( ℋ ↑m ℋ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
11		ax-hilex 31483	. . . 4 ⊢ ℋ ∈ V
12	11, 11	elmap 8881	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ( ℋ ↑m ℋ) ↔ 𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ)
13	12	anbi1i 636	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ ( ℋ ↑m ℋ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)) ↔ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
14	10, 13	bitri 278	1 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContOp ↔ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3076  ∃wrex 3086   class class class wbr 5103  ⟶wf 6529  ‘cfv 6533  (class class class)co 7414   ↑_m cmap 8829   < clt 11270  ℝ⁺crp 13045   ℋchba 31403  norm_ℎcno 31407   −_ℎ cmv 31409  ContOpccop 31430

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5251  ax-pow 5330  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7737  ax-hilex 31483

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3740  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-fv 6541  df-ov 7417  df-oprab 7418  df-mpo 7419  df-map 8831  df-cnop 32324

This theorem is used by:  cnopc  32397  0cnop  32463  idcnop  32465  lnopconi  32518