Theorem elcnop 32471

Description: Property defining a continuous Hilbert space operator. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elcnop	⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContOp ↔ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑤,𝑦,𝑧,𝑇

Proof of Theorem elcnop

Dummy variable 𝑡 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq1 6892	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (𝑡‘𝑤) = (𝑇‘𝑤))
2		fveq1 6892	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (𝑡‘𝑥) = (𝑇‘𝑥))
3	1, 2	oveq12d 7445	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥)) = ((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥)))
4	3	fveq2d 6897	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) = (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))))
5	4	breq1d 5115	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ((normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦 ↔ (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦))
6	5	imbi2d 343	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦) ↔ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
7	6	rexralbidv 3231	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
8	7	2ralbidv 3229	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
9		df-cnop 32454	. . 3 ⊢ ContOp = {𝑡 ∈ ( ℋ ↑m ℋ) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)}
10	8, 9	elrab2 3651	. 2 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContOp ↔ (𝑇 ∈ ( ℋ ↑m ℋ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
11		ax-hilex 31613	. . . 4 ⊢ ℋ ∈ V
12	11, 11	elmap 8910	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ( ℋ ↑m ℋ) ↔ 𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ)
13	12	anbi1i 636	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ ( ℋ ↑m ℋ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)) ↔ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
14	10, 13	bitri 278	1 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContOp ↔ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2146  ∀wral 3079  ∃wrex 3089   class class class wbr 5105  ⟶wf 6542  ‘cfv 6546  (class class class)co 7427   ↑_m cmap 8858   < clt 11353  ℝ⁺crp 13130   ℋchba 31533  norm_ℎcno 31537   −_ℎ cmv 31539  ContOpccop 31560

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2196  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5251  ax-pow 5330  ax-pr 5394  ax-un 7758  ax-hilex 31613

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2101  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3416  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3742  df-ss 3900  df-dif 4049  df-in 4093  df-un 4153  df-nul 4281  df-if 4485  df-pw 4561  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4838  df-uni 4870  df-br 5106  df-opab 5170  df-id 5549  df-xp 5660  df-rel 5661  df-cnv 5662  df-co 5663  df-dm 5664  df-rn 5665  df-iota 6500  df-fun 6548  df-fn 6549  df-f 6550  df-fv 6554  df-ov 7430  df-oprab 7431  df-mpo 7432  df-map 8860  df-cnop 32454

This theorem is used by:  cnopc  32527  0cnop  32593  idcnop  32595  lnopconi  32648