Theorem elcnop 31105

Description: Property defining a continuous Hilbert space operator. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elcnop	⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContOp ↔ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑤,𝑦,𝑧,𝑇

Proof of Theorem elcnop

Dummy variable 𝑡 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq1 6890	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (𝑡‘𝑤) = (𝑇‘𝑤))
2		fveq1 6890	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (𝑡‘𝑥) = (𝑇‘𝑥))
3	1, 2	oveq12d 7426	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥)) = ((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥)))
4	3	fveq2d 6895	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) = (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))))
5	4	breq1d 5158	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ((normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦 ↔ (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦))
6	5	imbi2d 340	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦) ↔ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
7	6	rexralbidv 3220	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
8	7	2ralbidv 3218	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
9		df-cnop 31088	. . 3 ⊢ ContOp = {𝑡 ∈ ( ℋ ↑m ℋ) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)}
10	8, 9	elrab2 3686	. 2 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContOp ↔ (𝑇 ∈ ( ℋ ↑m ℋ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
11		ax-hilex 30247	. . . 4 ⊢ ℋ ∈ V
12	11, 11	elmap 8864	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ( ℋ ↑m ℋ) ↔ 𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ)
13	12	anbi1i 624	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ ( ℋ ↑m ℋ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)) ↔ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
14	10, 13	bitri 274	1 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContOp ↔ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2106  ∀wral 3061  ∃wrex 3070   class class class wbr 5148  ⟶wf 6539  ‘cfv 6543  (class class class)co 7408   ↑_m cmap 8819   < clt 11247  ℝ⁺crp 12973   ℋchba 30167  norm_ℎcno 30171   −_ℎ cmv 30173  ContOpccop 30194

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5299  ax-nul 5306  ax-pow 5363  ax-pr 5427  ax-un 7724  ax-hilex 30247

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2724  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2885  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3433  df-v 3476  df-sbc 3778  df-dif 3951  df-un 3953  df-in 3955  df-ss 3965  df-nul 4323  df-if 4529  df-pw 4604  df-sn 4629  df-pr 4631  df-op 4635  df-uni 4909  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-id 5574  df-xp 5682  df-rel 5683  df-cnv 5684  df-co 5685  df-dm 5686  df-rn 5687  df-iota 6495  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-fv 6551  df-ov 7411  df-oprab 7412  df-mpo 7413  df-map 8821  df-cnop 31088

This theorem is referenced by:  cnopc  31161  0cnop  31227  idcnop  31229  lnopconi  31282