Theorem elcnop 29938

Description: Property defining a continuous Hilbert space operator. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elcnop	⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContOp ↔ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑤,𝑦,𝑧,𝑇

Proof of Theorem elcnop

Dummy variable 𝑡 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq1 6716	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (𝑡‘𝑤) = (𝑇‘𝑤))
2		fveq1 6716	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (𝑡‘𝑥) = (𝑇‘𝑥))
3	1, 2	oveq12d 7231	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥)) = ((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥)))
4	3	fveq2d 6721	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) = (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))))
5	4	breq1d 5063	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ((normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦 ↔ (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦))
6	5	imbi2d 344	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦) ↔ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
7	6	rexralbidv 3220	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
8	7	2ralbidv 3120	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
9		df-cnop 29921	. . 3 ⊢ ContOp = {𝑡 ∈ ( ℋ ↑m ℋ) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)}
10	8, 9	elrab2 3605	. 2 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContOp ↔ (𝑇 ∈ ( ℋ ↑m ℋ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
11		ax-hilex 29080	. . . 4 ⊢ ℋ ∈ V
12	11, 11	elmap 8552	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ( ℋ ↑m ℋ) ↔ 𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ)
13	12	anbi1i 627	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ ( ℋ ↑m ℋ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)) ↔ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
14	10, 13	bitri 278	1 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContOp ↔ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1543   ∈ wcel 2110  ∀wral 3061  ∃wrex 3062   class class class wbr 5053  ⟶wf 6376  ‘cfv 6380  (class class class)co 7213   ↑_m cmap 8508   < clt 10867  ℝ⁺crp 12586   ℋchba 29000  norm_ℎcno 29004   −_ℎ cmv 29006  ContOpccop 29027

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1976  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5192  ax-nul 5199  ax-pow 5258  ax-pr 5322  ax-un 7523  ax-hilex 29080

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 848  df-3an 1091  df-tru 1546  df-fal 1556  df-ex 1788  df-nf 1792  df-sb 2071  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2886  df-ral 3066  df-rex 3067  df-rab 3070  df-v 3410  df-sbc 3695  df-dif 3869  df-un 3871  df-in 3873  df-ss 3883  df-nul 4238  df-if 4440  df-pw 4515  df-sn 4542  df-pr 4544  df-op 4548  df-uni 4820  df-br 5054  df-opab 5116  df-id 5455  df-xp 5557  df-rel 5558  df-cnv 5559  df-co 5560  df-dm 5561  df-rn 5562  df-iota 6338  df-fun 6382  df-fn 6383  df-f 6384  df-fv 6388  df-ov 7216  df-oprab 7217  df-mpo 7218  df-map 8510  df-cnop 29921

This theorem is referenced by:  cnopc  29994  0cnop  30060  idcnop  30062  lnopconi  30115