Theorem dftpos3 8289

Description: Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. Compare df-cnv 5663. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dftpos3	⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧})

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐹

Proof of Theorem dftpos3

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relcnv 6112	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ Rel ◡dom 𝐹
2		dmtpos 8283	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → dom tpos 𝐹 = ◡dom 𝐹)
3	2	releqd 5760	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (Rel dom tpos 𝐹 ↔ Rel ◡dom 𝐹))
4	1, 3	mpbiri 261	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → Rel dom tpos 𝐹)
5		reltpos 8276	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Rel tpos 𝐹
6	4, 5	jctil 529	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (Rel tpos 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom tpos 𝐹))
7		relrelss 6293	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((Rel tpos 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom tpos 𝐹) ↔ tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((V × V) × V))
8	6, 7	sylib 221	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((V × V) × V))
9	8	sseld 3912	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 → 𝑤 ∈ ((V × V) × V)))
10		elvvv 5732	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ ((V × V) × V) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩)
11	9, 10	imbitrdi 254	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩))
12	11	pm4.71rd 572	. . . 4 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹)))
13		19.41vvv 1986	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹))
14		eleq1 2852	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹))
15		df-br 5107	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩tpos 𝐹𝑧 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹)
16		brtpos 8280	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ V → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩tpos 𝐹𝑧 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
17	16	elv 3459	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩tpos 𝐹𝑧 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)
18	15, 17	bitr3i 280	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)
19	14, 18	bitrdi 290	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
20	19	pm5.32i 585	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
21	20	3exbii 1883	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
22	13, 21	bitr3i 280	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
23	12, 22	bitrdi 290	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)))
24	23	eqabdv 2897	. 2 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)})
25		df-oprab 7447	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)}
26	24, 25	eqtr4di 2816	1 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧})

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2147  {cab 2741  Vcvv 3454   ⊆ wss 3900  ⟨cop 4838   class class class wbr 5106   × cxp 5653  ^◡ccnv 5654  dom cdm 5655  Rel wrel 5660  {coprab 7444  tpos ctpos 8270

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7775

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6512  df-fun 6560  df-fn 6561  df-fv 6566  df-oprab 7447  df-tpos 8271

This theorem is used by:  tposoprab  8307