Theorem dftpos3 8229

Description: Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. Compare df-cnv 5685. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dftpos3	⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧})

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐹

Proof of Theorem dftpos3

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relcnv 6104	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ Rel ◡dom 𝐹
2		dmtpos 8223	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → dom tpos 𝐹 = ◡dom 𝐹)
3	2	releqd 5779	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (Rel dom tpos 𝐹 ↔ Rel ◡dom 𝐹))
4	1, 3	mpbiri 258	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → Rel dom tpos 𝐹)
5		reltpos 8216	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Rel tpos 𝐹
6	4, 5	jctil 521	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (Rel tpos 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom tpos 𝐹))
7		relrelss 6273	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((Rel tpos 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom tpos 𝐹) ↔ tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((V × V) × V))
8	6, 7	sylib 217	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((V × V) × V))
9	8	sseld 3982	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 → 𝑤 ∈ ((V × V) × V)))
10		elvvv 5752	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ ((V × V) × V) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩)
11	9, 10	imbitrdi 250	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩))
12	11	pm4.71rd 564	. . . 4 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹)))
13		19.41vvv 1956	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹))
14		eleq1 2822	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹))
15		df-br 5150	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩tpos 𝐹𝑧 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹)
16		brtpos 8220	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ V → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩tpos 𝐹𝑧 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
17	16	elv 3481	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩tpos 𝐹𝑧 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)
18	15, 17	bitr3i 277	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)
19	14, 18	bitrdi 287	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
20	19	pm5.32i 576	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
21	20	3exbii 1853	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
22	13, 21	bitr3i 277	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
23	12, 22	bitrdi 287	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)))
24	23	eqabdv 2868	. 2 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)})
25		df-oprab 7413	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)}
26	24, 25	eqtr4di 2791	1 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 397   = wceq 1542  ∃wex 1782   ∈ wcel 2107  {cab 2710  Vcvv 3475   ⊆ wss 3949  ⟨cop 4635   class class class wbr 5149   × cxp 5675  ^◡ccnv 5676  dom cdm 5677  Rel wrel 5682  {coprab 7410  tpos ctpos 8210

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2138  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2172  ax-ext 2704  ax-sep 5300  ax-nul 5307  ax-pow 5364  ax-pr 5428  ax-un 7725

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 847  df-3an 1090  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2942  df-ral 3063  df-rex 3072  df-rab 3434  df-v 3477  df-dif 3952  df-un 3954  df-in 3956  df-ss 3966  df-nul 4324  df-if 4530  df-pw 4605  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632  df-op 4636  df-uni 4910  df-br 5150  df-opab 5212  df-mpt 5233  df-id 5575  df-xp 5683  df-rel 5684  df-cnv 5685  df-co 5686  df-dm 5687  df-rn 5688  df-res 5689  df-ima 5690  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6546  df-fn 6547  df-fv 6552  df-oprab 7413  df-tpos 8211

This theorem is referenced by:  tposoprab  8247