Theorem dftpos3 8249

Description: Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. Compare df-cnv 5674. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dftpos3	⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧})

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐹

Proof of Theorem dftpos3

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relcnv 6111	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ Rel ◡dom 𝐹
2		dmtpos 8243	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → dom tpos 𝐹 = ◡dom 𝐹)
3	2	releqd 5770	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (Rel dom tpos 𝐹 ↔ Rel ◡dom 𝐹))
4	1, 3	mpbiri 261	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → Rel dom tpos 𝐹)
5		reltpos 8236	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Rel tpos 𝐹
6	4, 5	jctil 529	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (Rel tpos 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom tpos 𝐹))
7		relrelss 6280	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((Rel tpos 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom tpos 𝐹) ↔ tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((V × V) × V))
8	6, 7	sylib 221	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((V × V) × V))
9	8	sseld 3939	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 → 𝑤 ∈ ((V × V) × V)))
10		elvvv 5742	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ ((V × V) × V) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩)
11	9, 10	imbitrdi 254	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩))
12	11	pm4.71rd 572	. . . 4 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹)))
13		19.41vvv 1984	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹))
14		eleq1 2854	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹))
15		df-br 5115	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩tpos 𝐹𝑧 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹)
16		brtpos 8240	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ V → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩tpos 𝐹𝑧 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
17	16	elv 3463	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩tpos 𝐹𝑧 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)
18	15, 17	bitr3i 280	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)
19	14, 18	bitrdi 290	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
20	19	pm5.32i 585	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
21	20	3exbii 1883	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
22	13, 21	bitr3i 280	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
23	12, 22	bitrdi 290	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)))
24	23	eqabdv 2899	. 2 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)})
25		df-oprab 7427	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)}
26	24, 25	eqtr4di 2819	1 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧})

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2146  {cab 2744  Vcvv 3458   ⊆ wss 3908  ⟨cop 4600   class class class wbr 5114   × cxp 5664  ^◡ccnv 5665  dom cdm 5666  Rel wrel 5671  {coprab 7424  tpos ctpos 8230

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-sep 5262  ax-nul 5274  ax-pow 5341  ax-pr 5409  ax-un 7745

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-mpt 5198  df-id 5561  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-ima 5679  df-iota 6499  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-fv 6551  df-oprab 7427  df-tpos 8231

This theorem is used by:  tposoprab  8267