Theorem dftpos3 8245

Description: Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. Compare df-cnv 5659. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dftpos3	⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧})

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐹

Proof of Theorem dftpos3

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relcnv 6098	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ Rel ◡dom 𝐹
2		dmtpos 8239	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → dom tpos 𝐹 = ◡dom 𝐹)
3	2	releqd 5755	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (Rel dom tpos 𝐹 ↔ Rel ◡dom 𝐹))
4	1, 3	mpbiri 261	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → Rel dom tpos 𝐹)
5		reltpos 8232	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Rel tpos 𝐹
6	4, 5	jctil 529	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (Rel tpos 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom tpos 𝐹))
7		relrelss 6268	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((Rel tpos 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom tpos 𝐹) ↔ tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((V × V) × V))
8	6, 7	sylib 221	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((V × V) × V))
9	8	sseld 3930	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 → 𝑤 ∈ ((V × V) × V)))
10		elvvv 5727	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ ((V × V) × V) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩)
11	9, 10	imbitrdi 254	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩))
12	11	pm4.71rd 572	. . . 4 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹)))
13		19.41vvv 1984	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹))
14		eleq1 2849	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹))
15		df-br 5104	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩tpos 𝐹𝑧 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹)
16		brtpos 8236	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ V → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩tpos 𝐹𝑧 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
17	16	elv 3456	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩tpos 𝐹𝑧 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)
18	15, 17	bitr3i 280	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)
19	14, 18	bitrdi 290	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
20	19	pm5.32i 585	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
21	20	3exbii 1883	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
22	13, 21	bitr3i 280	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
23	12, 22	bitrdi 290	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)))
24	23	eqabdv 2894	. 2 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)})
25		df-oprab 7416	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)}
26	24, 25	eqtr4di 2814	1 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧})

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2145  {cab 2739  Vcvv 3451   ⊆ wss 3899  ⟨cop 4590   class class class wbr 5103   × cxp 5649  ^◡ccnv 5650  dom cdm 5651  Rel wrel 5656  {coprab 7413  tpos ctpos 8226

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7740

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-iota 6487  df-fun 6533  df-fn 6534  df-fv 6539  df-oprab 7416  df-tpos 8227

This theorem is used by:  tposoprab  8263