Theorem funcf2lem 50015

Description: A utility theorem for proving equivalence of "is a functor". (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 1-Oct-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
funcf2lem	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ X𝑧 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵)(((𝐹‘(1st ‘𝑧))𝐽(𝐹‘(2nd ‘𝑧))) ↑m (𝐻‘𝑧)) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝐺𝑦):(𝑥𝐻𝑦)⟶((𝐹‘𝑥)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐹,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐺,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐻,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐽,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem funcf2lem

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elixp2 8912	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ X𝑧 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵)(((𝐹‘(1st ‘𝑧))𝐽(𝐹‘(2nd ‘𝑧))) ↑m (𝐻‘𝑧)) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵)(𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ (((𝐹‘(1st ‘𝑧))𝐽(𝐹‘(2nd ‘𝑧))) ↑m (𝐻‘𝑧))))
2		fveq2 6882	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝐺‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
3		df-ov 7420	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥𝐺𝑦) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
4	2, 3	eqtr4di 2815	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝐺‘𝑧) = (𝑥𝐺𝑦))
5		vex 3457	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
6		vex 3457	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
7	5, 6	op1std 8000	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (1st ‘𝑧) = 𝑥)
8	7	fveq2d 6886	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝐹‘(1st ‘𝑧)) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
9	5, 6	op2ndd 8001	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (2nd ‘𝑧) = 𝑦)
10	9	fveq2d 6886	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝐹‘(2nd ‘𝑧)) = (𝐹‘𝑦))
11	8, 10	oveq12d 7435	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ((𝐹‘(1st ‘𝑧))𝐽(𝐹‘(2nd ‘𝑧))) = ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦)))
12		fveq2 6882	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝐻‘𝑧) = (𝐻‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
13		df-ov 7420	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) = (𝐻‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
14	12, 13	eqtr4di 2815	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝐻‘𝑧) = (𝑥𝐻𝑦))
15	11, 14	oveq12d 7435	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (((𝐹‘(1st ‘𝑧))𝐽(𝐹‘(2nd ‘𝑧))) ↑m (𝐻‘𝑧)) = (((𝐹‘𝑥)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦)) ↑m (𝑥𝐻𝑦)))
16	4, 15	eleq12d 2856	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ((𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ (((𝐹‘(1st ‘𝑧))𝐽(𝐹‘(2nd ‘𝑧))) ↑m (𝐻‘𝑧)) ↔ (𝑥𝐺𝑦) ∈ (((𝐹‘𝑥)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦)) ↑m (𝑥𝐻𝑦))))
17		ovex 7450	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦)) ∈ V
18		ovex 7450	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∈ V
19	17, 18	elmap 8882	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥𝐺𝑦) ∈ (((𝐹‘𝑥)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦)) ↑m (𝑥𝐻𝑦)) ↔ (𝑥𝐺𝑦):(𝑥𝐻𝑦)⟶((𝐹‘𝑥)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦)))
20	16, 19	bitrdi 290	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ((𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ (((𝐹‘(1st ‘𝑧))𝐽(𝐹‘(2nd ‘𝑧))) ↑m (𝐻‘𝑧)) ↔ (𝑥𝐺𝑦):(𝑥𝐻𝑦)⟶((𝐹‘𝑥)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦))))
21	20	ralxp 5825	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵)(𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ (((𝐹‘(1st ‘𝑧))𝐽(𝐹‘(2nd ‘𝑧))) ↑m (𝐻‘𝑧)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝐺𝑦):(𝑥𝐻𝑦)⟶((𝐹‘𝑥)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦)))
22	21	3anbi3i 1177	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵)(𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ (((𝐹‘(1st ‘𝑧))𝐽(𝐹‘(2nd ‘𝑧))) ↑m (𝐻‘𝑧))) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝐺𝑦):(𝑥𝐻𝑦)⟶((𝐹‘𝑥)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦))))
23	1, 22	bitri 278	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ X𝑧 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵)(((𝐹‘(1st ‘𝑧))𝐽(𝐹‘(2nd ‘𝑧))) ↑m (𝐻‘𝑧)) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝐺𝑦):(𝑥𝐻𝑦)⟶((𝐹‘𝑥)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3078  Vcvv 3453  ⟨cop 4593   × cxp 5657   Fn wfn 6532  ⟶wf 6533  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7417  1^st c1st 7988  2^nd c2nd 7989   ↑_m cmap 8830  Xcixp 8908

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7740

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5554  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7420  df-oprab 7421  df-mpo 7422  df-1st 7990  df-2nd 7991  df-map 8832  df-ixp 8909

This theorem is used by:  funcf2lem2  50016  functhinc  50382