Theorem iscnrm3rlem4 50260

Description: Lemma for iscnrm3rlem8 50264. Given two disjoint subsets 𝑆 and 𝑇 of the underlying set of a topology 𝐽, if 𝑁 is a superset of (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∖ 𝑇), then it is a superset of 𝑆. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
iscnrm3rlem4.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)
iscnrm3rlem4.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽)
iscnrm3rlem4.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = ∅)
iscnrm3rlem4.4	⊢ (𝜑 → (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∖ 𝑇) ⊆ 𝑁)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
iscnrm3rlem4	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑁)

Proof of Theorem iscnrm3rlem4

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		indifdi 4242	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑆 ∩ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∖ 𝑇)) = ((𝑆 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆)) ∖ (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇))
2	1	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∖ 𝑇)) = ((𝑆 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆)) ∖ (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇)))
3		iscnrm3rlem4.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = ∅)
4	3	difeq2d 4066	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆)) ∖ (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇)) = ((𝑆 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆)) ∖ ∅))
5		dif0 4330	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆)) ∖ ∅) = (𝑆 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆))
6	4, 5	eqtrdi 2814	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆)) ∖ (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇)) = (𝑆 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆)))
7		iscnrm3rlem4.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top)
8		iscnrm3rlem4.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽)
9		eqid 2763	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∪ 𝐽 = ∪ 𝐽
10	9	sscls 23401	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽) → 𝑆 ⊆ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆))
11	7, 8, 10	syl2anc 596	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆))
12		dfss2 4097	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑆 ⊆ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ↔ (𝑆 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆)) = 𝑆)
13	11, 12	sylib 221	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆)) = 𝑆)
14	2, 6, 13	3eqtrd 2802	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∖ 𝑇)) = 𝑆)
15		dfss2 4097	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ⊆ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∖ 𝑇) ↔ (𝑆 ∩ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∖ 𝑇)) = 𝑆)
16	14, 15	sylibr 237	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∖ 𝑇))
17		iscnrm3rlem4.4	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∖ 𝑇) ⊆ 𝑁)
18	16, 17	sstrd 3923	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑁)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147   ⊆ wss 3900   ∖ cdif 4048   ∩ cin 4092  ∅c0 4281  ∪ cuni 4870  ‘cfv 6555  Topctop 23238  clsccl 23363

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5235  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-int 4911  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6509  df-fun 6557  df-fn 6558  df-f 6559  df-f1 6560  df-fo 6561  df-f1o 6562  df-fv 6563  df-top 23239  df-cld 23364  df-cls 23366

This theorem is used by:  iscnrm3rlem8  50264