Theorem lindspropd 33530

Description: Property deduction for linearly independent sets. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jul-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lindfpropd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐿))
lindfpropd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐿)))
lindfpropd.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (0g‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝐿)))
lindfpropd.4	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))
lindfpropd.5	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
lindfpropd.6	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)𝑦))
lindfpropd.k	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
lindfpropd.l	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lindspropd	⊢ (𝜑 → (LIndS‘𝐾) = (LIndS‘𝐿))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐾,𝑦   𝑥,𝐿,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑊(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem lindspropd

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		lindfpropd.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐿))
2	1	sseq2d 3968	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ⊆ (Base‘𝐾) ↔ 𝑧 ⊆ (Base‘𝐿)))
3		lindfpropd.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐿)))
4		lindfpropd.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (0g‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝐿)))
5		lindfpropd.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))
6		lindfpropd.5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
7		lindfpropd.6	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)𝑦))
8		lindfpropd.k	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
9		lindfpropd.l	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑊)
10		vex 3457	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
11	10	a1i 11	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑧 ∈ V)
12	11	resiexd 7196	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( I ↾ 𝑧) ∈ V)
13	1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12	lindfpropd 33529	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( I ↾ 𝑧) LIndF 𝐾 ↔ ( I ↾ 𝑧) LIndF 𝐿))
14	2, 13	anbi12d 641	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ⊆ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ ( I ↾ 𝑧) LIndF 𝐾) ↔ (𝑧 ⊆ (Base‘𝐿) ∧ ( I ↾ 𝑧) LIndF 𝐿)))
15		eqid 2761	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐾)
16	15	islinds 21841	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑧 ∈ (LIndS‘𝐾) ↔ (𝑧 ⊆ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ ( I ↾ 𝑧) LIndF 𝐾)))
17	8, 16	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ (LIndS‘𝐾) ↔ (𝑧 ⊆ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ ( I ↾ 𝑧) LIndF 𝐾)))
18		eqid 2761	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Base‘𝐿) = (Base‘𝐿)
19	18	islinds 21841	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐿 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝑧 ∈ (LIndS‘𝐿) ↔ (𝑧 ⊆ (Base‘𝐿) ∧ ( I ↾ 𝑧) LIndF 𝐿)))
20	9, 19	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ (LIndS‘𝐿) ↔ (𝑧 ⊆ (Base‘𝐿) ∧ ( I ↾ 𝑧) LIndF 𝐿)))
21	14, 17, 20	3bitr4d 313	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ (LIndS‘𝐾) ↔ 𝑧 ∈ (LIndS‘𝐿)))
22	21	eqrdv 2759	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (LIndS‘𝐾) = (LIndS‘𝐿))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1559   ∈ wcel 2141  Vcvv 3453   ⊆ wss 3904   class class class wbr 5099   I cid 5539   ↾ cres 5647  ‘cfv 6517  (class class class)co 7392  Basecbs 17228  +_gcplusg 17269  Scalarcsca 17272   ·_𝑠 cvsca 17273  0_gc0g 17451   LIndF clindf 21836  LIndSclinds 21837

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1814  ax-4 1828  ax-5 1929  ax-6 1986  ax-7 2027  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-10 2174  ax-11 2190  ax-12 2211  ax-ext 2733  ax-rep 5226  ax-sep 5245  ax-nul 5255  ax-pow 5321  ax-pr 5389

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1099  df-tru 1562  df-fal 1572  df-ex 1799  df-nf 1803  df-sb 2090  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3076  df-rex 3086  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3745  df-csb 3853  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4480  df-pw 4556  df-sn 4582  df-pr 4584  df-op 4588  df-uni 4865  df-int 4905  df-iun 4950  df-br 5100  df-opab 5162  df-mpt 5181  df-id 5540  df-xp 5651  df-rel 5652  df-cnv 5653  df-co 5654  df-dm 5655  df-rn 5656  df-res 5657  df-ima 5658  df-iota 6473  df-fun 6519  df-fn 6520  df-f 6521  df-f1 6522  df-fo 6523  df-f1o 6524  df-fv 6525  df-ov 7395  df-lss 20979  df-lsp 21019  df-lindf 21838  df-linds 21839

This theorem is referenced by:  fedgmullem2  33888