Theorem lindspropd 33378

Description: Property deduction for linearly independent sets. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jul-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lindfpropd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐿))
lindfpropd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐿)))
lindfpropd.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (0g‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝐿)))
lindfpropd.4	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))
lindfpropd.5	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
lindfpropd.6	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)𝑦))
lindfpropd.k	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
lindfpropd.l	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lindspropd	⊢ (𝜑 → (LIndS‘𝐾) = (LIndS‘𝐿))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐾,𝑦   𝑥,𝐿,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑊(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem lindspropd

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		lindfpropd.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐿))
2	1	sseq2d 4041	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ⊆ (Base‘𝐾) ↔ 𝑧 ⊆ (Base‘𝐿)))
3		lindfpropd.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐿)))
4		lindfpropd.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (0g‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝐿)))
5		lindfpropd.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))
6		lindfpropd.5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
7		lindfpropd.6	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))) → (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)𝑦))
8		lindfpropd.k	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
9		lindfpropd.l	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑊)
10		vex 3492	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
11	10	a1i 11	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑧 ∈ V)
12	11	resiexd 7255	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( I ↾ 𝑧) ∈ V)
13	1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12	lindfpropd 33377	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( I ↾ 𝑧) LIndF 𝐾 ↔ ( I ↾ 𝑧) LIndF 𝐿))
14	2, 13	anbi12d 631	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ⊆ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ ( I ↾ 𝑧) LIndF 𝐾) ↔ (𝑧 ⊆ (Base‘𝐿) ∧ ( I ↾ 𝑧) LIndF 𝐿)))
15		eqid 2740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐾)
16	15	islinds 21854	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑧 ∈ (LIndS‘𝐾) ↔ (𝑧 ⊆ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ ( I ↾ 𝑧) LIndF 𝐾)))
17	8, 16	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ (LIndS‘𝐾) ↔ (𝑧 ⊆ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ ( I ↾ 𝑧) LIndF 𝐾)))
18		eqid 2740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Base‘𝐿) = (Base‘𝐿)
19	18	islinds 21854	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐿 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝑧 ∈ (LIndS‘𝐿) ↔ (𝑧 ⊆ (Base‘𝐿) ∧ ( I ↾ 𝑧) LIndF 𝐿)))
20	9, 19	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ (LIndS‘𝐿) ↔ (𝑧 ⊆ (Base‘𝐿) ∧ ( I ↾ 𝑧) LIndF 𝐿)))
21	14, 17, 20	3bitr4d 311	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ (LIndS‘𝐾) ↔ 𝑧 ∈ (LIndS‘𝐿)))
22	21	eqrdv 2738	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (LIndS‘𝐾) = (LIndS‘𝐿))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2108  Vcvv 3488   ⊆ wss 3976   class class class wbr 5166   I cid 5592   ↾ cres 5702  ‘cfv 6575  (class class class)co 7450  Basecbs 17260  +_gcplusg 17313  Scalarcsca 17316   ·_𝑠 cvsca 17317  0_gc0g 17501   LIndF clindf 21849  LIndSclinds 21850

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-rep 5303  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pow 5383  ax-pr 5447

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-reu 3389  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-sbc 3805  df-csb 3922  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-pw 4624  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-int 4971  df-iun 5017  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-mpt 5250  df-id 5593  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-rn 5711  df-res 5712  df-ima 5713  df-iota 6527  df-fun 6577  df-fn 6578  df-f 6579  df-f1 6580  df-fo 6581  df-f1o 6582  df-fv 6583  df-ov 7453  df-lss 20955  df-lsp 20995  df-lindf 21851  df-linds 21852

This theorem is referenced by:  fedgmullem2  33645