Theorem mthmval 36088

Description: A theorem is a pre-statement, whose reduct is also the reduct of a provable pre-statement. Unlike the difference between pre-statement and statement, this application of the reduct is not necessarily trivial: there are theorems that are not themselves provable but are provable once enough "dummy variables" are introduced. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mthmval.r	⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)
mthmval.j	⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)
mthmval.u	⊢ 𝑈 = (mThm‘𝑇)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mthmval	⊢ 𝑈 = (◡𝑅 “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽))

Proof of Theorem mthmval

Dummy variable 𝑡 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mthmval.u	. 2 ⊢ 𝑈 = (mThm‘𝑇)
2		fveq2 6888	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mStRed‘𝑡) = (mStRed‘𝑇))
3		mthmval.r	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)
4	2, 3	eqtr4di 2819	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mStRed‘𝑡) = 𝑅)
5	4	cnveqd 5866	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ◡(mStRed‘𝑡) = ◡𝑅)
6		fveq2 6888	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mPPSt‘𝑡) = (mPPSt‘𝑇))
7		mthmval.j	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)
8	6, 7	eqtr4di 2819	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mPPSt‘𝑡) = 𝐽)
9	4, 8	imaeq12d 6068	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ((mStRed‘𝑡) “ (mPPSt‘𝑡)) = (𝑅 “ 𝐽))
10	5, 9	imaeq12d 6068	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (◡(mStRed‘𝑡) “ ((mStRed‘𝑡) “ (mPPSt‘𝑡))) = (◡𝑅 “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽)))
11		df-mthm 36012	. . . 4 ⊢ mThm = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (◡(mStRed‘𝑡) “ ((mStRed‘𝑡) “ (mPPSt‘𝑡))))
12		fvex 6901	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (mStRed‘𝑡) ∈ V
13	12	cnvex 7931	. . . . 5 ⊢ ◡(mStRed‘𝑡) ∈ V
14		imaexg 7919	. . . . 5 ⊢ (◡(mStRed‘𝑡) ∈ V → (◡(mStRed‘𝑡) “ ((mStRed‘𝑡) “ (mPPSt‘𝑡))) ∈ V)
15	13, 14	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (◡(mStRed‘𝑡) “ ((mStRed‘𝑡) “ (mPPSt‘𝑡))) ∈ V
16	10, 11, 15	fvmpt3i 7002	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ V → (mThm‘𝑇) = (◡𝑅 “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽)))
17		0ima 6085	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∅ “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽)) = ∅
18	17	eqcomi 2775	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ = (∅ “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽))
19		fvprc 6880	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (mThm‘𝑇) = ∅)
20		fvprc 6880	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (mStRed‘𝑇) = ∅)
21	3, 20	eqtrid 2813	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → 𝑅 = ∅)
22	21	cnveqd 5866	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → ◡𝑅 = ◡∅)
23		cnv0 5874	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ◡∅ = ∅
24	22, 23	eqtrdi 2817	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → ◡𝑅 = ∅)
25	24	imaeq1d 6066	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (◡𝑅 “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽)) = (∅ “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽)))
26	18, 19, 25	3eqtr4a 2827	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (mThm‘𝑇) = (◡𝑅 “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽)))
27	16, 26	pm2.61i 184	. 2 ⊢ (mThm‘𝑇) = (◡𝑅 “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽))
28	1, 27	eqtri 2789	1 ⊢ 𝑈 = (◡𝑅 “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  Vcvv 3458  ∅c0 4289  ^◡ccnv 5665   “ cima 5669  ‘cfv 6543  mStRedcmsr 35987  mPPStcmpps 35991  mThmcmthm 35992

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-sep 5262  ax-nul 5274  ax-pow 5341  ax-pr 5409  ax-un 7745

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-mpt 5198  df-id 5561  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-ima 5679  df-iota 6499  df-fun 6545  df-fv 6551  df-mthm 36012

This theorem is used by:  elmthm  36089  mthmsta  36091  mthmblem  36093