Theorem mthmval 36520

Description: A theorem is a pre-statement, whose reduct is also the reduct of a provable pre-statement. Unlike the difference between pre-statement and statement, this application of the reduct is not necessarily trivial: there are theorems that are not themselves provable but are provable once enough "dummy variables" are introduced. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mthmval.r	⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)
mthmval.j	⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)
mthmval.u	⊢ 𝑈 = (mThm‘𝑇)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mthmval	⊢ 𝑈 = (◡𝑅 “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽))

Proof of Theorem mthmval

Dummy variable 𝑡 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mthmval.u	. 2 ⊢ 𝑈 = (mThm‘𝑇)
2		fveq2 6911	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mStRed‘𝑡) = (mStRed‘𝑇))
3		mthmval.r	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)
4	2, 3	eqtr4di 2816	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mStRed‘𝑡) = 𝑅)
5	4	cnveqd 5861	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ◡(mStRed‘𝑡) = ◡𝑅)
6		fveq2 6911	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mPPSt‘𝑡) = (mPPSt‘𝑇))
7		mthmval.j	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)
8	6, 7	eqtr4di 2816	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (mPPSt‘𝑡) = 𝐽)
9	4, 8	imaeq12d 6066	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ((mStRed‘𝑡) “ (mPPSt‘𝑡)) = (𝑅 “ 𝐽))
10	5, 9	imaeq12d 6066	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (◡(mStRed‘𝑡) “ ((mStRed‘𝑡) “ (mPPSt‘𝑡))) = (◡𝑅 “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽)))
11		df-mthm 36444	. . . 4 ⊢ mThm = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (◡(mStRed‘𝑡) “ ((mStRed‘𝑡) “ (mPPSt‘𝑡))))
12		fvex 6924	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (mStRed‘𝑡) ∈ V
13	12	cnvex 7964	. . . . 5 ⊢ ◡(mStRed‘𝑡) ∈ V
14		imaexg 7952	. . . . 5 ⊢ (◡(mStRed‘𝑡) ∈ V → (◡(mStRed‘𝑡) “ ((mStRed‘𝑡) “ (mPPSt‘𝑡))) ∈ V)
15	13, 14	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (◡(mStRed‘𝑡) “ ((mStRed‘𝑡) “ (mPPSt‘𝑡))) ∈ V
16	10, 11, 15	fvmpt3i 7025	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ V → (mThm‘𝑇) = (◡𝑅 “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽)))
17		0ima 6214	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∅ “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽)) = ∅
18	17	eqcomi 2772	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ = (∅ “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽))
19		fvprc 6903	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (mThm‘𝑇) = ∅)
20		fvprc 6903	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (mStRed‘𝑇) = ∅)
21	3, 20	eqtrid 2810	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → 𝑅 = ∅)
22	21	cnveqd 5861	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → ◡𝑅 = ◡∅)
23		cnv0 5869	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ◡∅ = ∅
24	22, 23	eqtrdi 2814	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → ◡𝑅 = ∅)
25	24	imaeq1d 6064	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (◡𝑅 “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽)) = (∅ “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽)))
26	18, 19, 25	3eqtr4a 2824	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑇 ∈ V → (mThm‘𝑇) = (◡𝑅 “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽)))
27	16, 26	pm2.61i 184	. 2 ⊢ (mThm‘𝑇) = (◡𝑅 “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽))
28	1, 27	eqtri 2786	1 ⊢ 𝑈 = (◡𝑅 “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  Vcvv 3454  ∅c0 4281  ^◡ccnv 5655   “ cima 5659  ‘cfv 6561  mStRedcmsr 36419  mPPStcmpps 36423  mThmcmthm 36424

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5253  ax-nul 5264  ax-pow 5332  ax-pr 5396  ax-un 7778

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5551  df-xp 5662  df-rel 5663  df-cnv 5664  df-co 5665  df-dm 5666  df-rn 5667  df-res 5668  df-ima 5669  df-iota 6515  df-fun 6563  df-fv 6569  df-mthm 36444

This theorem is used by:  elmthm  36521  mthmsta  36523  mthmblem  36525