Theorem eqreznegel 9848

Description: Two ways to express the image under negation of a set of integers. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eqreznegel	|- ( A C_ ZZ -> { z e. RR | -u z e. A } = { z e. ZZ | -u z e. A } )

Distinct variable group:   z, A

Proof of Theorem eqreznegel

Dummy variable w is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssel 3221	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( A C_ ZZ -> ( -u w e. A -> -u w e. ZZ ) )
2		recn 8165	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( w e. RR -> w e. CC )
3		negid 8426	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- ( w e. CC -> ( w + -u w ) = 0 )
4		0z 9490	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- 0 e. ZZ
5	3, 4	eqeltrdi 2322	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( w e. CC -> ( w + -u w ) e. ZZ )
6	5	pm4.71i 391	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( w e. CC <-> ( w e. CC /\ ( w + -u w ) e. ZZ ) )
7		zrevaddcl 9530	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( -u w e. ZZ -> ( ( w e. CC /\ ( w + -u w ) e. ZZ ) <-> w e. ZZ ) )
8	6, 7	bitrid 192	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( -u w e. ZZ -> ( w e. CC <-> w e. ZZ ) )
9	2, 8	imbitrid 154	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( -u w e. ZZ -> ( w e. RR -> w e. ZZ ) )
10	1, 9	syl6 33	. . . . . . 7 |- ( A C_ ZZ -> ( -u w e. A -> ( w e. RR -> w e. ZZ ) ) )
11	10	com23 78	. . . . . 6 |- ( A C_ ZZ -> ( w e. RR -> ( -u w e. A -> w e. ZZ ) ) )
12	11	impd 254	. . . . 5 |- ( A C_ ZZ -> ( ( w e. RR /\ -u w e. A ) -> w e. ZZ ) )
13		simpr 110	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( w e. RR /\ -u w e. A ) -> -u w e. A )
14	13	a1i 9	. . . . 5 |- ( A C_ ZZ -> ( ( w e. RR /\ -u w e. A ) -> -u w e. A ) )
15	12, 14	jcad 307	. . . 4 |- ( A C_ ZZ -> ( ( w e. RR /\ -u w e. A ) -> ( w e. ZZ /\ -u w e. A ) ) )
16		zre 9483	. . . . 5 |- ( w e. ZZ -> w e. RR )
17	16	anim1i 340	. . . 4 |- ( ( w e. ZZ /\ -u w e. A ) -> ( w e. RR /\ -u w e. A ) )
18	15, 17	impbid1 142	. . 3 |- ( A C_ ZZ -> ( ( w e. RR /\ -u w e. A ) <-> ( w e. ZZ /\ -u w e. A ) ) )
19		negeq 8372	. . . . 5 |- ( z = w -> -u z = -u w )
20	19	eleq1d 2300	. . . 4 |- ( z = w -> ( -u z e. A <-> -u w e. A ) )
21	20	elrab 2962	. . 3 |- ( w e. { z e. RR | -u z e. A } <-> ( w e. RR /\ -u w e. A ) )
22	20	elrab 2962	. . 3 |- ( w e. { z e. ZZ | -u z e. A } <-> ( w e. ZZ /\ -u w e. A ) )
23	18, 21, 22	3bitr4g 223	. 2 |- ( A C_ ZZ -> ( w e. { z e. RR | -u z e. A } <-> w e. { z e. ZZ | -u z e. A } ) )
24	23	eqrdv 2229	1 |- ( A C_ ZZ -> { z e. RR | -u z e. A } = { z e. ZZ | -u z e. A } )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1397   e. wcel 2202   {crab 2514   C_ wss 3200  (class class class)co 6018   CCcc 8030   RRcr 8031   0cc0 8032   + caddc 8035   -ucneg 8351   ZZcz 9479

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-13 2204  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-sep 4207  ax-pow 4264  ax-pr 4299  ax-un 4530  ax-setind 4635  ax-cnex 8123  ax-resscn 8124  ax-1cn 8125  ax-1re 8126  ax-icn 8127  ax-addcl 8128  ax-addrcl 8129  ax-mulcl 8130  ax-addcom 8132  ax-addass 8134  ax-distr 8136  ax-i2m1 8137  ax-0lt1 8138  ax-0id 8140  ax-rnegex 8141  ax-cnre 8143  ax-pre-ltirr 8144  ax-pre-ltwlin 8145  ax-pre-lttrn 8146  ax-pre-ltadd 8148

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 1005  df-3an 1006  df-tru 1400  df-fal 1403  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-eu 2082  df-mo 2083  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2363  df-ne 2403  df-nel 2498  df-ral 2515  df-rex 2516  df-reu 2517  df-rab 2519  df-v 2804  df-sbc 3032  df-dif 3202  df-un 3204  df-in 3206  df-ss 3213  df-pw 3654  df-sn 3675  df-pr 3676  df-op 3678  df-uni 3894  df-int 3929  df-br 4089  df-opab 4151  df-id 4390  df-xp 4731  df-rel 4732  df-cnv 4733  df-co 4734  df-dm 4735  df-iota 5286  df-fun 5328  df-fv 5334  df-riota 5971  df-ov 6021  df-oprab 6022  df-mpo 6023  df-pnf 8216  df-mnf 8217  df-xr 8218  df-ltxr 8219  df-le 8220  df-sub 8352  df-neg 8353  df-inn 9144  df-n0 9403  df-z 9480

This theorem is referenced by: (None)