Theorem eqreznegel 9909

Description: Two ways to express the image under negation of a set of integers. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eqreznegel	|- ( A C_ ZZ -> { z e. RR | -u z e. A } = { z e. ZZ | -u z e. A } )

Distinct variable group:   z, A

Proof of Theorem eqreznegel

Dummy variable w is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssel 3222	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( A C_ ZZ -> ( -u w e. A -> -u w e. ZZ ) )
2		recn 8225	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( w e. RR -> w e. CC )
3		negid 8485	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- ( w e. CC -> ( w + -u w ) = 0 )
4		0z 9551	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- 0 e. ZZ
5	3, 4	eqeltrdi 2322	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( w e. CC -> ( w + -u w ) e. ZZ )
6	5	pm4.71i 391	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( w e. CC <-> ( w e. CC /\ ( w + -u w ) e. ZZ ) )
7		zrevaddcl 9591	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( -u w e. ZZ -> ( ( w e. CC /\ ( w + -u w ) e. ZZ ) <-> w e. ZZ ) )
8	6, 7	bitrid 192	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( -u w e. ZZ -> ( w e. CC <-> w e. ZZ ) )
9	2, 8	imbitrid 154	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( -u w e. ZZ -> ( w e. RR -> w e. ZZ ) )
10	1, 9	syl6 33	. . . . . . 7 |- ( A C_ ZZ -> ( -u w e. A -> ( w e. RR -> w e. ZZ ) ) )
11	10	com23 78	. . . . . 6 |- ( A C_ ZZ -> ( w e. RR -> ( -u w e. A -> w e. ZZ ) ) )
12	11	impd 254	. . . . 5 |- ( A C_ ZZ -> ( ( w e. RR /\ -u w e. A ) -> w e. ZZ ) )
13		simpr 110	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( w e. RR /\ -u w e. A ) -> -u w e. A )
14	13	a1i 9	. . . . 5 |- ( A C_ ZZ -> ( ( w e. RR /\ -u w e. A ) -> -u w e. A ) )
15	12, 14	jcad 307	. . . 4 |- ( A C_ ZZ -> ( ( w e. RR /\ -u w e. A ) -> ( w e. ZZ /\ -u w e. A ) ) )
16		zre 9544	. . . . 5 |- ( w e. ZZ -> w e. RR )
17	16	anim1i 340	. . . 4 |- ( ( w e. ZZ /\ -u w e. A ) -> ( w e. RR /\ -u w e. A ) )
18	15, 17	impbid1 142	. . 3 |- ( A C_ ZZ -> ( ( w e. RR /\ -u w e. A ) <-> ( w e. ZZ /\ -u w e. A ) ) )
19		negeq 8431	. . . . 5 |- ( z = w -> -u z = -u w )
20	19	eleq1d 2300	. . . 4 |- ( z = w -> ( -u z e. A <-> -u w e. A ) )
21	20	elrab 2963	. . 3 |- ( w e. { z e. RR | -u z e. A } <-> ( w e. RR /\ -u w e. A ) )
22	20	elrab 2963	. . 3 |- ( w e. { z e. ZZ | -u z e. A } <-> ( w e. ZZ /\ -u w e. A ) )
23	18, 21, 22	3bitr4g 223	. 2 |- ( A C_ ZZ -> ( w e. { z e. RR | -u z e. A } <-> w e. { z e. ZZ | -u z e. A } ) )
24	23	eqrdv 2229	1 |- ( A C_ ZZ -> { z e. RR | -u z e. A } = { z e. ZZ | -u z e. A } )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1398   e. wcel 2202   {crab 2515   C_ wss 3201  (class class class)co 6028   CCcc 8090   RRcr 8091   0cc0 8092   + caddc 8095   -ucneg 8410   ZZcz 9540

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-13 2204  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-sep 4212  ax-pow 4270  ax-pr 4305  ax-un 4536  ax-setind 4641  ax-cnex 8183  ax-resscn 8184  ax-1cn 8185  ax-1re 8186  ax-icn 8187  ax-addcl 8188  ax-addrcl 8189  ax-mulcl 8190  ax-addcom 8192  ax-addass 8194  ax-distr 8196  ax-i2m1 8197  ax-0lt1 8198  ax-0id 8200  ax-rnegex 8201  ax-cnre 8203  ax-pre-ltirr 8204  ax-pre-ltwlin 8205  ax-pre-lttrn 8206  ax-pre-ltadd 8208

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 1006  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-fal 1404  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1811  df-eu 2082  df-mo 2083  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2364  df-ne 2404  df-nel 2499  df-ral 2516  df-rex 2517  df-reu 2518  df-rab 2520  df-v 2805  df-sbc 3033  df-dif 3203  df-un 3205  df-in 3207  df-ss 3214  df-pw 3658  df-sn 3679  df-pr 3680  df-op 3682  df-uni 3899  df-int 3934  df-br 4094  df-opab 4156  df-id 4396  df-xp 4737  df-rel 4738  df-cnv 4739  df-co 4740  df-dm 4741  df-iota 5293  df-fun 5335  df-fv 5341  df-riota 5981  df-ov 6031  df-oprab 6032  df-mpo 6033  df-pnf 8275  df-mnf 8276  df-xr 8277  df-ltxr 8278  df-le 8279  df-sub 8411  df-neg 8412  df-inn 9203  df-n0 9462  df-z 9541

This theorem is referenced by: (None)