Theorem upgrpredgv 16387

Description: An edge of a pseudograph always connects two vertices if the edge contains two sets. The two vertices/sets need not necessarily be different (loops are allowed). (Contributed by AV, 18-Nov-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
upgredg.v	|- V = (Vtx ` G )
upgredg.e	|- E = (Edg ` G )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
upgrpredgv	|- ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ ( M e. U /\ N e. W ) /\ { M , N } e. E ) -> ( M e. V /\ N e. V ) )

Proof of Theorem upgrpredgv

Dummy variables m n are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		upgredg.v	. . . 4 |- V = (Vtx ` G )
2		upgredg.e	. . . 4 |- E = (Edg ` G )
3	1, 2	upgredg 16385	. . 3 |- ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ { M , N } e. E ) -> E. m e. V E. n e. V { M , N } = { m , n } )
4	3	3adant2 1047	. 2 |- ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ ( M e. U /\ N e. W ) /\ { M , N } e. E ) -> E. m e. V E. n e. V { M , N } = { m , n } )
5		preq12bg 3898	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( M e. U /\ N e. W ) /\ ( m e. V /\ n e. V ) ) -> ( { M , N } = { m , n } <-> ( ( M = m /\ N = n ) \/ ( M = n /\ N = m ) ) ) )
6	5	3ad2antl2 1191	. . . 4 |- ( ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ ( M e. U /\ N e. W ) /\ { M , N } e. E ) /\ ( m e. V /\ n e. V ) ) -> ( { M , N } = { m , n } <-> ( ( M = m /\ N = n ) \/ ( M = n /\ N = m ) ) ) )
7		eleq1 2301	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( m = M -> ( m e. V <-> M e. V ) )
8	7	eqcoms 2241	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( M = m -> ( m e. V <-> M e. V ) )
9	8	biimpd 144	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( M = m -> ( m e. V -> M e. V ) )
10		eleq1 2301	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( n = N -> ( n e. V <-> N e. V ) )
11	10	eqcoms 2241	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( N = n -> ( n e. V <-> N e. V ) )
12	11	biimpd 144	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( N = n -> ( n e. V -> N e. V ) )
13	9, 12	im2anan9 606	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( M = m /\ N = n ) -> ( ( m e. V /\ n e. V ) -> ( M e. V /\ N e. V ) ) )
14	13	com12 30	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( m e. V /\ n e. V ) -> ( ( M = m /\ N = n ) -> ( M e. V /\ N e. V ) ) )
15		eleq1 2301	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( n = M -> ( n e. V <-> M e. V ) )
16	15	eqcoms 2241	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( M = n -> ( n e. V <-> M e. V ) )
17	16	biimpd 144	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( M = n -> ( n e. V -> M e. V ) )
18		eleq1 2301	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( m = N -> ( m e. V <-> N e. V ) )
19	18	eqcoms 2241	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( N = m -> ( m e. V <-> N e. V ) )
20	19	biimpd 144	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( N = m -> ( m e. V -> N e. V ) )
21	17, 20	im2anan9 606	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( M = n /\ N = m ) -> ( ( n e. V /\ m e. V ) -> ( M e. V /\ N e. V ) ) )
22	21	com12 30	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( n e. V /\ m e. V ) -> ( ( M = n /\ N = m ) -> ( M e. V /\ N e. V ) ) )
23	22	ancoms 268	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( m e. V /\ n e. V ) -> ( ( M = n /\ N = m ) -> ( M e. V /\ N e. V ) ) )
24	14, 23	jaod 729	. . . . 5 |- ( ( m e. V /\ n e. V ) -> ( ( ( M = m /\ N = n ) \/ ( M = n /\ N = m ) ) -> ( M e. V /\ N e. V ) ) )
25	24	adantl 277	. . . 4 |- ( ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ ( M e. U /\ N e. W ) /\ { M , N } e. E ) /\ ( m e. V /\ n e. V ) ) -> ( ( ( M = m /\ N = n ) \/ ( M = n /\ N = m ) ) -> ( M e. V /\ N e. V ) ) )
26	6, 25	sylbid 150	. . 3 |- ( ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ ( M e. U /\ N e. W ) /\ { M , N } e. E ) /\ ( m e. V /\ n e. V ) ) -> ( { M , N } = { m , n } -> ( M e. V /\ N e. V ) ) )
27	26	rexlimdvva 2676	. 2 |- ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ ( M e. U /\ N e. W ) /\ { M , N } e. E ) -> ( E. m e. V E. n e. V { M , N } = { m , n } -> ( M e. V /\ N e. V ) ) )
28	4, 27	mpd 13	1 |- ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ ( M e. U /\ N e. W ) /\ { M , N } e. E ) -> ( M e. V /\ N e. V ) )

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   \/ wo 720   /\ w3a 1009   = wceq 1402   e. wcel 2209   E.wrex 2529   {cpr 3710   ` cfv 5377  Vtxcvtx 16253  Edgcedg 16298  UPGraphcupgr 16332

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-nul 4259  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578  ax-setind 4684  ax-cnex 8270  ax-resscn 8271  ax-1cn 8272  ax-1re 8273  ax-icn 8274  ax-addcl 8275  ax-addrcl 8276  ax-mulcl 8277  ax-addcom 8279  ax-mulcom 8280  ax-addass 8281  ax-mulass 8282  ax-distr 8283  ax-i2m1 8284  ax-1rid 8286  ax-0id 8287  ax-rnegex 8288  ax-cnre 8290

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-reu 2535  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-nul 3521  df-if 3639  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-int 3971  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-mpt 4194  df-tr 4230  df-id 4438  df-iord 4511  df-on 4513  df-suc 4516  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-res 4786  df-ima 4787  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fn 5380  df-f 5381  df-f1 5382  df-fo 5383  df-f1o 5384  df-fv 5385  df-riota 6038  df-ov 6088  df-oprab 6089  df-mpo 6090  df-1st 6374  df-2nd 6375  df-1o 6687  df-2o 6688  df-en 7023  df-sub 8499  df-inn 9305  df-2 9363  df-3 9364  df-4 9365  df-5 9366  df-6 9367  df-7 9368  df-8 9369  df-9 9370  df-n0 9564  df-dec 9778  df-ndx 13355  df-slot 13356  df-base 13358  df-edgf 16246  df-vtx 16255  df-iedg 16256  df-edg 16299  df-upgren 16334

This theorem is used by: (None)