Theorem upgredg 16590

Description: For each edge in a pseudograph, there are two vertices which are connected by this edge. (Contributed by AV, 4-Nov-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 26-Nov-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
upgredg.v	|- V = (Vtx ` G )
upgredg.e	|- E = (Edg ` G )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
upgredg	|- ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ C e. E ) -> E. a e. V E. b e. V C = { a , b } )

Distinct variable groups:   C, a, b   G, a, b   V, a, b

Allowed substitution hints:   E( a, b)

Proof of Theorem upgredg

Dummy variables x z are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		upgredg.e	. . . . 5 |- E = (Edg ` G )
2		edgvalg 16505	. . . . 5 |- ( G e. UPGraph -> (Edg ` G ) = ran (iEdg ` G ) )
3	1, 2	eqtrid 2283	. . . 4 |- ( G e. UPGraph -> E = ran (iEdg ` G ) )
4	3	eleq2d 2308	. . 3 |- ( G e. UPGraph -> ( C e. E <-> C e. ran (iEdg ` G ) ) )
5	4	biimpa 296	. 2 |- ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ C e. E ) -> C e. ran (iEdg ` G ) )
6		upgredg.v	. . . . . . . 8 |- V = (Vtx ` G )
7		eqid 2238	. . . . . . . 8 |- (iEdg ` G ) = (iEdg ` G )
8	6, 7	upgrfen 16543	. . . . . . 7 |- ( G e. UPGraph -> (iEdg ` G ) : dom (iEdg ` G ) --> { x e. ~P V | ( x ~~ 1o \/ x ~~ 2o ) } )
9	8	ffnd 5537	. . . . . 6 |- ( G e. UPGraph -> (iEdg ` G ) Fn dom (iEdg ` G ) )
10	9	adantr 276	. . . . 5 |- ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ C e. ran (iEdg ` G ) ) -> (iEdg ` G ) Fn dom (iEdg ` G ) )
11		fnfun 5481	. . . . 5 |- ( (iEdg ` G ) Fn dom (iEdg ` G ) -> Fun (iEdg ` G ) )
12	10, 11	syl 14	. . . 4 |- ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ C e. ran (iEdg ` G ) ) -> Fun (iEdg ` G ) )
13		simpr 110	. . . 4 |- ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ C e. ran (iEdg ` G ) ) -> C e. ran (iEdg ` G ) )
14		elrnrexdm 5850	. . . 4 |- ( Fun (iEdg ` G ) -> ( C e. ran (iEdg ` G ) -> E. z e. dom (iEdg ` G ) C = ( (iEdg ` G ) ` z ) ) )
15	12, 13, 14	sylc 62	. . 3 |- ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ C e. ran (iEdg ` G ) ) -> E. z e. dom (iEdg ` G ) C = ( (iEdg ` G ) ` z ) )
16		simpll 531	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ C e. ran (iEdg ` G ) ) /\ ( z e. dom (iEdg ` G ) /\ C = ( (iEdg ` G ) ` z ) ) ) -> G e. UPGraph )
17	16, 9	syl 14	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ C e. ran (iEdg ` G ) ) /\ ( z e. dom (iEdg ` G ) /\ C = ( (iEdg ` G ) ` z ) ) ) -> (iEdg ` G ) Fn dom (iEdg ` G ) )
18		simprl 535	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ C e. ran (iEdg ` G ) ) /\ ( z e. dom (iEdg ` G ) /\ C = ( (iEdg ` G ) ` z ) ) ) -> z e. dom (iEdg ` G ) )
19	6, 7	upgrex 16549	. . . . 5 |- ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ (iEdg ` G ) Fn dom (iEdg ` G ) /\ z e. dom (iEdg ` G ) ) -> E. a e. V E. b e. V ( (iEdg ` G ) ` z ) = { a , b } )
20	16, 17, 18, 19	syl3anc 1278	. . . 4 |- ( ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ C e. ran (iEdg ` G ) ) /\ ( z e. dom (iEdg ` G ) /\ C = ( (iEdg ` G ) ` z ) ) ) -> E. a e. V E. b e. V ( (iEdg ` G ) ` z ) = { a , b } )
21		simprr 537	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ C e. ran (iEdg ` G ) ) /\ ( z e. dom (iEdg ` G ) /\ C = ( (iEdg ` G ) ` z ) ) ) -> C = ( (iEdg ` G ) ` z ) )
22	21	eqeq1d 2247	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ C e. ran (iEdg ` G ) ) /\ ( z e. dom (iEdg ` G ) /\ C = ( (iEdg ` G ) ` z ) ) ) -> ( C = { a , b } <-> ( (iEdg ` G ) ` z ) = { a , b } ) )
23	22	2rexbidv 2575	. . . 4 |- ( ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ C e. ran (iEdg ` G ) ) /\ ( z e. dom (iEdg ` G ) /\ C = ( (iEdg ` G ) ` z ) ) ) -> ( E. a e. V E. b e. V C = { a , b } <-> E. a e. V E. b e. V ( (iEdg ` G ) ` z ) = { a , b } ) )
24	20, 23	mpbird 167	. . 3 |- ( ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ C e. ran (iEdg ` G ) ) /\ ( z e. dom (iEdg ` G ) /\ C = ( (iEdg ` G ) ` z ) ) ) -> E. a e. V E. b e. V C = { a , b } )
25	15, 24	rexlimddv 2673	. 2 |- ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ C e. ran (iEdg ` G ) ) -> E. a e. V E. b e. V C = { a , b } )
26	5, 25	syldan 282	1 |- ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ C e. E ) -> E. a e. V E. b e. V C = { a , b } )

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   \/ wo 720   = wceq 1402   e. wcel 2209   E.wrex 2529   {crab 2532   ~Pcpw 3688   {cpr 3710   class class class wbr 4131   dom cdm 4776   ran crn 4777   Fun wfun 5374   Fn wfn 5375   ` cfv 5380   1oc1o 6684   2oc2o 6685   ~~ cen 7024  Vtxcvtx 16458  iEdgciedg 16459  Edgcedg 16503  UPGraphcupgr 16537

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4251  ax-nul 4261  ax-pow 4313  ax-pr 4348  ax-un 4580  ax-setind 4686  ax-cnex 8276  ax-resscn 8277  ax-1cn 8278  ax-1re 8279  ax-icn 8280  ax-addcl 8281  ax-addrcl 8282  ax-mulcl 8283  ax-addcom 8285  ax-mulcom 8286  ax-addass 8287  ax-mulass 8288  ax-distr 8289  ax-i2m1 8290  ax-1rid 8292  ax-0id 8293  ax-rnegex 8294  ax-cnre 8296

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-reu 2535  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-nul 3521  df-if 3639  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-int 3971  df-br 4132  df-opab 4194  df-mpt 4195  df-tr 4232  df-id 4440  df-iord 4513  df-on 4515  df-suc 4518  df-xp 4782  df-rel 4783  df-cnv 4784  df-co 4785  df-dm 4786  df-rn 4787  df-res 4788  df-ima 4789  df-iota 5340  df-fun 5382  df-fn 5383  df-f 5384  df-f1 5385  df-fo 5386  df-f1o 5387  df-fv 5388  df-riota 6041  df-ov 6091  df-oprab 6092  df-mpo 6093  df-1st 6378  df-2nd 6379  df-1o 6691  df-2o 6692  df-en 7027  df-sub 8506  df-inn 9314  df-2 9372  df-3 9373  df-4 9374  df-5 9375  df-6 9376  df-7 9377  df-8 9378  df-9 9379  df-n0 9575  df-dec 9789  df-ndx 13413  df-slot 13414  df-base 13416  df-edgf 16451  df-vtx 16460  df-iedg 16461  df-edg 16504  df-upgren 16539

This theorem is used by:  upgrpredgv  16592  upgredg2vtx  16594  upgredgpr  16595  usgr1vr  16694