ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  upgrwlkedg Unicode version

Theorem upgrwlkedg 16602
Description: The edges of a walk in a pseudograph join exactly the two corresponding adjacent vertices in the walk. (Contributed by AV, 27-Feb-2021.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
upgrwlkedg.i  |-  I  =  (iEdg `  G )
Assertion
Ref Expression
upgrwlkedg  |-  ( ( G  e. UPGraph  /\  F (Walks `  G ) P )  ->  A. k  e.  ( 0..^ ( `  F
) ) ( I `
 ( F `  k ) )  =  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) } )
Distinct variable groups:    k, F    k, G    k, I    P, k

Proof of Theorem upgrwlkedg
StepHypRef Expression
1 eqid 2238 . . . . 5  |-  (Vtx `  G )  =  (Vtx
`  G )
2 upgrwlkedg.i . . . . 5  |-  I  =  (iEdg `  G )
31, 2upgriswlkdc 16601 . . . 4  |-  ( G  e. UPGraph  ->  ( F (Walks `  G ) P  <->  ( F  e. Word  dom  I  /\  P : ( 0 ... ( `  F )
) --> (Vtx `  G
)  /\  A. k  e.  ( 0..^ ( `  F
) ) (DECID  ( P `
 k )  =  ( P `  (
k  +  1 ) )  /\  ( I `
 ( F `  k ) )  =  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) } ) ) ) )
4 simp3 1030 . . . 4  |-  ( ( F  e. Word  dom  I  /\  P : ( 0 ... ( `  F
) ) --> (Vtx `  G )  /\  A. k  e.  ( 0..^ ( `  F )
) (DECID  ( P `  k
)  =  ( P `
 ( k  +  1 ) )  /\  ( I `  ( F `  k )
)  =  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) } ) )  ->  A. k  e.  ( 0..^ ( `  F
) ) (DECID  ( P `
 k )  =  ( P `  (
k  +  1 ) )  /\  ( I `
 ( F `  k ) )  =  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) } ) )
53, 4biimtrdi 163 . . 3  |-  ( G  e. UPGraph  ->  ( F (Walks `  G ) P  ->  A. k  e.  (
0..^ ( `  F )
) (DECID  ( P `  k
)  =  ( P `
 ( k  +  1 ) )  /\  ( I `  ( F `  k )
)  =  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) } ) ) )
65imp 124 . 2  |-  ( ( G  e. UPGraph  /\  F (Walks `  G ) P )  ->  A. k  e.  ( 0..^ ( `  F
) ) (DECID  ( P `
 k )  =  ( P `  (
k  +  1 ) )  /\  ( I `
 ( F `  k ) )  =  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) } ) )
7 simpr 110 . . . 4  |-  ( (DECID  ( P `  k )  =  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) )  /\  (
I `  ( F `  k ) )  =  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) } )  ->  (
I `  ( F `  k ) )  =  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) } )
87a1i 9 . . 3  |-  ( ( G  e. UPGraph  /\  F (Walks `  G ) P )  ->  ( (DECID  ( P `
 k )  =  ( P `  (
k  +  1 ) )  /\  ( I `
 ( F `  k ) )  =  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) } )  ->  (
I `  ( F `  k ) )  =  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) } ) )
98ralimdv 2618 . 2  |-  ( ( G  e. UPGraph  /\  F (Walks `  G ) P )  ->  ( A. k  e.  ( 0..^ ( `  F
) ) (DECID  ( P `
 k )  =  ( P `  (
k  +  1 ) )  /\  ( I `
 ( F `  k ) )  =  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) } )  ->  A. k  e.  ( 0..^ ( `  F
) ) ( I `
 ( F `  k ) )  =  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) } ) )
106, 9mpd 13 1  |-  ( ( G  e. UPGraph  /\  F (Walks `  G ) P )  ->  A. k  e.  ( 0..^ ( `  F
) ) ( I `
 ( F `  k ) )  =  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) } )
Colors of variables:    wff set class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:    -> wi 4    /\ wa 104  DECID wdc 846    /\ w3a 1009    = wceq 1402    e. wcel 2209   A.wral 2528   {cpr 3710   class class class wbr 4130   dom cdm 4774   -->wf 5373   ` cfv 5377  (class class class)co 6085   0cc0 8179   1c1 8180    + caddc 8182   ...cfz 10411  ..^cfzo 10549  ♯chash 11214  Word cword 11304  Vtxcvtx 16253  iEdgciedg 16254  UPGraphcupgr 16332  Walkscwlks 16558
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-coll 4246  ax-sep 4249  ax-nul 4259  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578  ax-setind 4684  ax-iinf 4735  ax-cnex 8270  ax-resscn 8271  ax-1cn 8272  ax-1re 8273  ax-icn 8274  ax-addcl 8275  ax-addrcl 8276  ax-mulcl 8277  ax-addcom 8279  ax-mulcom 8280  ax-addass 8281  ax-mulass 8282  ax-distr 8283  ax-i2m1 8284  ax-0lt1 8285  ax-1rid 8286  ax-0id 8287  ax-rnegex 8288  ax-cnre 8290  ax-pre-ltirr 8291  ax-pre-ltwlin 8292  ax-pre-lttrn 8293  ax-pre-apti 8294  ax-pre-ltadd 8295
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 847  df-ifp 991  df-3or 1010  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-nel 2516  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-reu 2535  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-nul 3521  df-if 3639  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-int 3971  df-iun 4014  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-mpt 4194  df-tr 4230  df-id 4438  df-iord 4511  df-on 4513  df-ilim 4514  df-suc 4516  df-iom 4738  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-res 4786  df-ima 4787  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fn 5380  df-f 5381  df-f1 5382  df-fo 5383  df-f1o 5384  df-fv 5385  df-riota 6038  df-ov 6088  df-oprab 6089  df-mpo 6090  df-1st 6374  df-2nd 6375  df-recs 6576  df-frec 6662  df-1o 6687  df-2o 6688  df-er 6807  df-map 6924  df-en 7023  df-dom 7024  df-fin 7025  df-pnf 8362  df-mnf 8363  df-xr 8364  df-ltxr 8365  df-le 8366  df-sub 8499  df-neg 8500  df-inn 9305  df-2 9363  df-3 9364  df-4 9365  df-5 9366  df-6 9367  df-7 9368  df-8 9369  df-9 9370  df-n0 9564  df-z 9645  df-dec 9778  df-uz 9922  df-fz 10412  df-fzo 10550  df-ihash 11215  df-word 11305  df-ndx 13355  df-slot 13356  df-base 13358  df-edgf 16246  df-vtx 16255  df-iedg 16256  df-edg 16299  df-uhgrm 16310  df-upgren 16334  df-wlks 16559
This theorem is used by:  eupth2lem3fi  16717
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator