Theorem ecopoverg 6538

Description: Assuming that operation 𝐹 is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation ∼, specified by the first hypothesis, is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ecopopr.1	⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}
ecopoprg.com	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥))
ecopoprg.cl	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)
ecopoprg.ass	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧)))
ecopoprg.can	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ecopoverg	⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑣,𝑢, +   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑣,𝑢

Allowed substitution hints:   ∼ (𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑣,𝑢)

Proof of Theorem ecopoverg

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 ℎ are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ecopopr.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}
2	1	relopabi 4673	. . . 4 ⊢ Rel ∼
3	2	a1i 9	. . 3 ⊢ (⊤ → Rel ∼ )
4		ecopoprg.com	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥))
5	1, 4	ecopovsymg 6536	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 ∼ 𝑔 → 𝑔 ∼ 𝑓)
6	5	adantl 275	. . 3 ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ 𝑓 ∼ 𝑔) → 𝑔 ∼ 𝑓)
7		ecopoprg.cl	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)
8		ecopoprg.ass	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧)))
9		ecopoprg.can	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
10	1, 4, 7, 8, 9	ecopovtrng 6537	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑓 ∼ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ∼ ℎ) → 𝑓 ∼ ℎ)
11	10	adantl 275	. . 3 ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ (𝑓 ∼ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ∼ ℎ)) → 𝑓 ∼ ℎ)
12	4	adantl 275	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((((𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆)) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥))
13		simpll 519	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (((𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝑔 ∈ 𝑆)
14		simplr 520	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (((𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆)) → ℎ ∈ 𝑆)
15	12, 13, 14	caovcomd 5935	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (((𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑔 + ℎ) = (ℎ + 𝑔))
16	1	ecopoveq 6532	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (((𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆)) → (⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩ ↔ (𝑔 + ℎ) = (ℎ + 𝑔)))
17	15, 16	mpbird 166	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆)) → ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩)
18	17	anidms 395	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆) → ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩)
19	18	rgen2a 2489	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∀ℎ ∈ 𝑆 ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩
20		breq12 3942	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑓 = ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩ ∧ 𝑓 = ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩) → (𝑓 ∼ 𝑓 ↔ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩))
21	20	anidms 395	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩ → (𝑓 ∼ 𝑓 ↔ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩))
22	21	ralxp 4690	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)𝑓 ∼ 𝑓 ↔ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∀ℎ ∈ 𝑆 ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩)
23	19, 22	mpbir 145	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)𝑓 ∼ 𝑓
24	23	rspec 2487	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) → 𝑓 ∼ 𝑓)
25	24	a1i 9	. . . 4 ⊢ (⊤ → (𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) → 𝑓 ∼ 𝑓))
26		opabssxp 4621	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))} ⊆ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) × (𝑆 × 𝑆))
27	1, 26	eqsstri 3134	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∼ ⊆ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) × (𝑆 × 𝑆))
28	27	ssbri 3980	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 ∼ 𝑓 → 𝑓((𝑆 × 𝑆) × (𝑆 × 𝑆))𝑓)
29		brxp 4578	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓((𝑆 × 𝑆) × (𝑆 × 𝑆))𝑓 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)))
30	29	simplbi 272	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓((𝑆 × 𝑆) × (𝑆 × 𝑆))𝑓 → 𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆))
31	28, 30	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 ∼ 𝑓 → 𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆))
32	25, 31	impbid1 141	. . 3 ⊢ (⊤ → (𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ↔ 𝑓 ∼ 𝑓))
33	3, 6, 11, 32	iserd 6463	. 2 ⊢ (⊤ → ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆))
34	33	mptru 1341	1 ⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   ∧ w3a 963   = wceq 1332  ⊤wtru 1333  ∃wex 1469   ∈ wcel 1481  ∀wral 2417  ⟨cop 3535   class class class wbr 3937  {copab 3996   × cxp 4545  Rel wrel 4552  (class class class)co 5782   Er wer 6434

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1424  ax-7 1425  ax-gen 1426  ax-ie1 1470  ax-ie2 1471  ax-8 1483  ax-10 1484  ax-11 1485  ax-i12 1486  ax-bndl 1487  ax-4 1488  ax-14 1493  ax-17 1507  ax-i9 1511  ax-ial 1515  ax-i5r 1516  ax-ext 2122  ax-sep 4054  ax-pow 4106  ax-pr 4139

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 965  df-tru 1335  df-nf 1438  df-sb 1737  df-eu 2003  df-mo 2004  df-clab 2127  df-cleq 2133  df-clel 2136  df-nfc 2271  df-ral 2422  df-rex 2423  df-v 2691  df-sbc 2914  df-csb 3008  df-un 3080  df-in 3082  df-ss 3089  df-pw 3517  df-sn 3538  df-pr 3539  df-op 3541  df-uni 3745  df-iun 3823  df-br 3938  df-opab 3998  df-xp 4553  df-rel 4554  df-cnv 4555  df-co 4556  df-dm 4557  df-iota 5096  df-fv 5139  df-ov 5785  df-er 6437

This theorem is referenced by:  enqer  7190  enrer  7567