Theorem fmptdF 31881

Description: Domain and codomain of the mapping operation; deduction form. This version of fmptd 7114 uses bound-variable hypothesis instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
fmptdF.p	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
fmptdF.a	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
fmptdF.c	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶
fmptdF.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
fmptdF.2	⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fmptdF	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐶)

Proof of Theorem fmptdF

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fmptdF.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
2	1	sbimi 2078	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
3		sban 2084	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
4		fmptdF.p	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
5	4	sbf 2263	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
6		fmptdF.a	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
7	6	clelsb1fw 2908	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
8	5, 7	anbi12i 628	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
9	3, 8	bitri 275	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
10		sbsbc 3782	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
11		sbcel12 4409	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)
12		vex 3479	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
13		fmptdF.c	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶
14	12, 13	csbgfi 3915	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = 𝐶
15	14	eleq2i 2826	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
16	11, 15	bitri 275	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
17	10, 16	bitri 275	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
18	2, 9, 17	3imtr3i 291	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
19	18	ralrimiva 3147	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
20		nfcv 2904	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
21		nfcv 2904	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵
22		nfcsb1v 3919	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵
23		csbeq1a 3908	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
24	6, 20, 21, 22, 23	cbvmptf 5258	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
25	24	fmpt 7110	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵):𝐴⟶𝐶)
26	19, 25	sylib 217	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵):𝐴⟶𝐶)
27		fmptdF.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)
28	27	feq1i 6709	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐶 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵):𝐴⟶𝐶)
29	26, 28	sylibr 233	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐶)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 397   = wceq 1542  Ⅎwnf 1786  [wsb 2068   ∈ wcel 2107  Ⅎwnfc 2884  ∀wral 3062  [wsbc 3778  ⦋csb 3894   ↦ cmpt 5232  ⟶wf 6540

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2138  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2172  ax-ext 2704  ax-sep 5300  ax-nul 5307  ax-pr 5428

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 847  df-3an 1090  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2886  df-ral 3063  df-rex 3072  df-rab 3434  df-v 3477  df-sbc 3779  df-csb 3895  df-dif 3952  df-un 3954  df-in 3956  df-ss 3966  df-nul 4324  df-if 4530  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632  df-op 4636  df-br 5150  df-opab 5212  df-mpt 5233  df-id 5575  df-xp 5683  df-rel 5684  df-cnv 5685  df-co 5686  df-dm 5687  df-rn 5688  df-res 5689  df-ima 5690  df-fun 6546  df-fn 6547  df-f 6548

This theorem is referenced by:  fmptcof2  31882  esumcl  33028  esumid  33042  esumgsum  33043  esumval  33044  esumel  33045  esumsplit  33051  esumaddf  33059  esumss  33070  esumpfinvalf  33074