Theorem fmptdF 32674

Description: Domain and codomain of the mapping operation; deduction form. This version of fmptd 7148 uses bound-variable hypothesis instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
fmptdF.p	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
fmptdF.a	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
fmptdF.c	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶
fmptdF.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
fmptdF.2	⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fmptdF	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐶)

Proof of Theorem fmptdF

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fmptdF.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
2	1	sbimi 2074	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
3		sban 2080	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
4		fmptdF.p	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
5	4	sbf 2272	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
6		fmptdF.a	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
7	6	clelsb1fw 2912	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
8	5, 7	anbi12i 627	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
9	3, 8	bitri 275	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
10		sbsbc 3808	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
11		sbcel12 4434	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)
12		vex 3492	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
13		fmptdF.c	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶
14	12, 13	csbgfi 3942	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = 𝐶
15	14	eleq2i 2836	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
16	11, 15	bitri 275	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
17	10, 16	bitri 275	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
18	2, 9, 17	3imtr3i 291	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
19	18	ralrimiva 3152	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
20		nfcv 2908	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
21		nfcv 2908	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵
22		nfcsb1v 3946	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵
23		csbeq1a 3935	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
24	6, 20, 21, 22, 23	cbvmptf 5275	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
25	24	fmpt 7144	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵):𝐴⟶𝐶)
26	19, 25	sylib 218	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵):𝐴⟶𝐶)
27		fmptdF.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)
28	27	feq1i 6738	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐶 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵):𝐴⟶𝐶)
29	26, 28	sylibr 234	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐶)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537  Ⅎwnf 1781  [wsb 2064   ∈ wcel 2108  Ⅎwnfc 2893  ∀wral 3067  [wsbc 3804  ⦋csb 3921   ↦ cmpt 5249  ⟶wf 6569

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pr 5447

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-sbc 3805  df-csb 3922  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-mpt 5250  df-id 5593  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-rn 5711  df-res 5712  df-ima 5713  df-fun 6575  df-fn 6576  df-f 6577

This theorem is referenced by:  fmptcof2  32675  esumcl  33994  esumid  34008  esumgsum  34009  esumval  34010  esumel  34011  esumsplit  34017  esumaddf  34025  esumss  34036  esumpfinvalf  34040