Theorem fmptdF 32580

Description: Domain and codomain of the mapping operation; deduction form. This version of fmptd 7086 uses bound-variable hypothesis instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
fmptdF.p	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
fmptdF.a	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
fmptdF.c	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶
fmptdF.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
fmptdF.2	⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fmptdF	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐶)

Proof of Theorem fmptdF

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fmptdF.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
2	1	sbimi 2075	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
3		sban 2081	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
4		fmptdF.p	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
5	4	sbf 2271	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
6		fmptdF.a	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
7	6	clelsb1fw 2895	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
8	5, 7	anbi12i 628	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
9	3, 8	bitri 275	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
10		sbsbc 3757	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
11		sbcel12 4374	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)
12		vex 3451	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
13		fmptdF.c	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶
14	12, 13	csbgfi 3882	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = 𝐶
15	14	eleq2i 2820	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
16	11, 15	bitri 275	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
17	10, 16	bitri 275	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
18	2, 9, 17	3imtr3i 291	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
19	18	ralrimiva 3125	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
20		nfcv 2891	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
21		nfcv 2891	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵
22		nfcsb1v 3886	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵
23		csbeq1a 3876	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
24	6, 20, 21, 22, 23	cbvmptf 5207	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
25	24	fmpt 7082	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵):𝐴⟶𝐶)
26	19, 25	sylib 218	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵):𝐴⟶𝐶)
27		fmptdF.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)
28	27	feq1i 6679	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐶 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵):𝐴⟶𝐶)
29	26, 28	sylibr 234	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐶)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540  Ⅎwnf 1783  [wsb 2065   ∈ wcel 2109  Ⅎwnfc 2876  ∀wral 3044  [wsbc 3753  ⦋csb 3862   ↦ cmpt 5188  ⟶wf 6507

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pr 5387

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3863  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-id 5533  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-rn 5649  df-res 5650  df-ima 5651  df-fun 6513  df-fn 6514  df-f 6515

This theorem is referenced by:  fmptcof2  32581  esumcl  34020  esumid  34034  esumgsum  34035  esumval  34036  esumel  34037  esumsplit  34043  esumaddf  34051  esumss  34062  esumpfinvalf  34066