Theorem cnfnc 32248

Description: Basic continuity property of a continuous functional. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cnfnc	⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ ContFn ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑇,𝑦

Proof of Theorem cnfnc

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elcnfn 32200	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContFn ↔ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ℂ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤)))
2	1	simprbi 502	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContFn → ∀𝑧 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤))
3		oveq2 7418	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧) = (𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴))
4	3	fveq2d 6885	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) = (normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)))
5	4	breq1d 5118	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 ↔ (normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥))
6		fveq2 6881	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑇‘𝑧) = (𝑇‘𝐴))
7	6	oveq2d 7426	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝑧)) = ((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴)))
8	7	fveq2d 6885	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝑧))) = (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))))
9	8	breq1d 5118	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤 ↔ (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤))
10	5, 9	imbi12d 347	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤) ↔ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤)))
11	10	rexralbidv 3229	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤)))
12		breq2 5112	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → ((abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤 ↔ (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵))
13	12	imbi2d 343	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤) ↔ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵)))
14	13	rexralbidv 3229	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵)))
15	11, 14	rspc2v 3591	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → (∀𝑧 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵)))
16	2, 15	syl5com 32	. 2 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContFn → ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵)))
17	16	3impib 1132	1 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ ContFn ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1101   = wceq 1568   ∈ wcel 2141  ∀wral 3077  ∃wrex 3087   class class class wbr 5108  ⟶wf 6532  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7410  ℂcc 11097   < clt 11242   − cmin 11440  ℝ⁺crp 13015  abscabs 15285   ℋchba 31237  norm_ℎcno 31241   −_ℎ cmv 31243  ContFnccnfn 31271

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1823  ax-4 1837  ax-5 1938  ax-6 1995  ax-7 2036  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-10 2174  ax-11 2190  ax-12 2211  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5256  ax-pow 5336  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732  ax-cnex 11155  ax-hilex 31317

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1571  df-fal 1581  df-ex 1808  df-nf 1812  df-sb 2095  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3744  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-pw 4563  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7413  df-oprab 7414  df-mpo 7415  df-map 8825  df-cnfn 32165

This theorem is referenced by:  nmcfnexi  32369