Theorem cnfnc 32191

Description: Basic continuity property of a continuous functional. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cnfnc	⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ ContFn ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑇,𝑦

Proof of Theorem cnfnc

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elcnfn 32143	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContFn ↔ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ℂ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤)))
2	1	simprbi 502	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContFn → ∀𝑧 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤))
3		oveq2 7408	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧) = (𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴))
4	3	fveq2d 6875	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) = (normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)))
5	4	breq1d 5115	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 ↔ (normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥))
6		fveq2 6871	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑇‘𝑧) = (𝑇‘𝐴))
7	6	oveq2d 7416	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝑧)) = ((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴)))
8	7	fveq2d 6875	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝑧))) = (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))))
9	8	breq1d 5115	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤 ↔ (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤))
10	5, 9	imbi12d 347	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤) ↔ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤)))
11	10	rexralbidv 3231	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤)))
12		breq2 5109	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → ((abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤 ↔ (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵))
13	12	imbi2d 343	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤) ↔ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵)))
14	13	rexralbidv 3231	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝑤) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵)))
15	11, 14	rspc2v 3595	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → (∀𝑧 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝑧))) < 𝑤) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵)))
16	2, 15	syl5com 32	. 2 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContFn → ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵)))
17	16	3impib 1132	1 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ ContFn ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝐴)) < 𝑥 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝑦) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) < 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1101   = wceq 1563   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3079  ∃wrex 3089   class class class wbr 5105  ⟶wf 6521  ‘cfv 6525  (class class class)co 7400  ℂcc 11086   < clt 11231   − cmin 11429  ℝ⁺crp 13007  abscabs 15275   ℋchba 31180  norm_ℎcno 31184   −_ℎ cmv 31186  ContFnccnfn 31214

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1818  ax-4 1832  ax-5 1933  ax-6 1990  ax-7 2031  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5251  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7722  ax-cnex 11144  ax-hilex 31260

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1566  df-fal 1576  df-ex 1803  df-nf 1807  df-sb 2094  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3418  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3748  df-dif 3910  df-un 3912  df-in 3914  df-ss 3924  df-nul 4289  df-if 4484  df-pw 4560  df-sn 4586  df-pr 4588  df-op 4592  df-uni 4869  df-br 5106  df-opab 5168  df-id 5547  df-xp 5658  df-rel 5659  df-cnv 5660  df-co 5661  df-dm 5662  df-rn 5663  df-iota 6481  df-fun 6527  df-fn 6528  df-f 6529  df-fv 6533  df-ov 7403  df-oprab 7404  df-mpo 7405  df-map 8814  df-cnfn 32108

This theorem is referenced by:  nmcfnexi  32312