Theorem comfeqd 16971

Description: Condition for two categories with the same hom-sets to have the same composition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
comfeqd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → (comp‘𝐶) = (comp‘𝐷))
comfeqd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
comfeqd	⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷))

Proof of Theorem comfeqd

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		comfeqd.1	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → (comp‘𝐶) = (comp‘𝐷))
2	1	oveqd 7167	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑧) = (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐷)𝑧))
3	2	oveqd 7167	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑧)𝑓) = (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐷)𝑧)𝑓))
4	3	ralrimivw 3183	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑧)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑧)𝑓) = (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐷)𝑧)𝑓))
5	4	ralrimivw 3183	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑧)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑧)𝑓) = (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐷)𝑧)𝑓))
6	5	ralrimivw 3183	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑧)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑧)𝑓) = (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐷)𝑧)𝑓))
7	6	ralrimivw 3183	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)∀𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑧)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑧)𝑓) = (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐷)𝑧)𝑓))
8	7	ralrimivw 3183	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)∀𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑧)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑧)𝑓) = (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐷)𝑧)𝑓))
9		eqid 2821	. . 3 ⊢ (comp‘𝐶) = (comp‘𝐶)
10		eqid 2821	. . 3 ⊢ (comp‘𝐷) = (comp‘𝐷)
11		eqid 2821	. . 3 ⊢ (Hom ‘𝐶) = (Hom ‘𝐶)
12		eqidd 2822	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐶) = (Base‘𝐶))
13		comfeqd.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))
14	13	homfeqbas 16960	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐶) = (Base‘𝐷))
15	9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 13	comfeq 16970	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)∀𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑧)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑧)𝑓) = (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐷)𝑧)𝑓)))
16	8, 15	mpbird 259	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1533  ∀wral 3138  ⟨cop 4566  ‘cfv 6349  (class class class)co 7150  Basecbs 16477  Hom chom 16570  compcco 16571  Hom_f chomf 16931  comp_fccomf 16932

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2793  ax-rep 5182  ax-sep 5195  ax-nul 5202  ax-pow 5258  ax-pr 5321  ax-un 7455

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2618  df-eu 2650  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ne 3017  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-reu 3145  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-sbc 3772  df-csb 3883  df-dif 3938  df-un 3940  df-in 3942  df-ss 3951  df-nul 4291  df-if 4467  df-pw 4540  df-sn 4561  df-pr 4563  df-op 4567  df-uni 4832  df-iun 4913  df-br 5059  df-opab 5121  df-mpt 5139  df-id 5454  df-xp 5555  df-rel 5556  df-cnv 5557  df-co 5558  df-dm 5559  df-rn 5560  df-res 5561  df-ima 5562  df-iota 6308  df-fun 6351  df-fn 6352  df-f 6353  df-f1 6354  df-fo 6355  df-f1o 6356  df-fv 6357  df-ov 7153  df-oprab 7154  df-mpo 7155  df-1st 7683  df-2nd 7684  df-homf 16935  df-comf 16936

This theorem is referenced by:  fullresc  17115